Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,631
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

2/22-23 "There's no way..." Storm Part 2


Maestrobjwa
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MountainGeek said:

What are the primary factors that influence your thinking for the "target" elevation in a given storm? Eg, sometimes you give 600', others 800 or 1000 or 1,500 etc. 

We have tools here at the office where I can look at snow levels of every model and I use them as tools for creating the forecast. Just one of the benefits of being on the desk! AWIPS and our tool integration are very sophisticated. I also look at soundings and check other variables to mentally calculate! 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Forecast here currently has 8-14". I Wont be home to see it happen. Kinda sucks. I will head to Easton tomorrow afternoon and stay at the school tomorrow night.

Could be quite the gradient from western Talbot to your house. Mt Holly goalposts are still real wide 1 to 16" range...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

This happened with the Feb 2006 storm. I'll never forget seeing the visible satellite that morning after staying up all night with the heavy thundersnow. 

Any chance for us fellow “Millville” alumni you could go back to the Weather Desk today and insert “absolute beat down” somewhere in the forecast discussion? 

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jmho, don't buy the models that are dry in northern MD and PA. Starting with last weekend's storm, I've received almost exactly 2" qpf, including almost 1" from last weekend'sstorm. None of the models had that. At least in these parts, the drought pattern is over with a noticeable regime change thanks to the warming equatorial Pacific. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Western ridge is nice but a broader trough is blunting the heights to the east. The lakes low feature is getting more prominent. Don’t like seeing that trend stronger so late in the game. Check 700 and 850 heights. We’re not closing off there because of that and it’s taking away the heavy GFS precip. And preventing tilt. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, baltosquid said:

Western ridge is nice but a broader trough is blunting the heights to the east. The lakes low feature is getting more prominent. Don’t like seeing that trend stronger so late in the game. Check 700 and 850 heights. We’re not closing off there because of that and it’s taking away the heavy GFS precip. And preventing tilt. 

Not sure i buy that especially with a 974 off Rehoboth. Yes vertically stacked always helps esp for classic deform, would be surprised not to see it close up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

I think it'll be a little beneficial, but really like areas above 600' for the early stuff tomorrow. Any elevation helps!

I’ll just have to drive up the street for the first part of the storm, if that’s the case.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah 700mb closed low is up in MI now.

Just now, DDweatherman said:

Not sure i buy that especially with a 974 off Rehoboth. Yes vertically stacked always helps esp for classic deform, would be surprised not to see it close up. 

I should clarify it is a problem earlier. We still do close but the best runs had it happen more SW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, baltosquid said:

Yeah 700mb closed low is up in MI now.

I should clarify it is a problem earlier. We still do close but the best runs had it happen more SW.

We definitely do the best when all our UL passes align. We need to improve that today. How’d it look on the NAM? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, baltosquid said:

Western ridge is nice but a broader trough is blunting the heights to the east. The lakes low feature is getting more prominent. Don’t like seeing that trend stronger so late in the game. Check 700 and 850 heights. We’re not closing off there because of that and it’s taking away the heavy GFS precip. And preventing tilt. 

This right here is the La Nina effect. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxUSAF said:

Gfs is about identical for Delmarva and points NE. Naso identical for the rest of us lol

Not what we wanted to see, but still maybe a 2-4er instead of 3-6er, and there’s always the norlun possibility 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...