StormyClearweather

Wild. I said I'd be happy to get .3 today, so I won't complain, even if the dogs really, really didn't like this: https://video.nest.com/clip/67f945793cee4911bd068a93b2cee8b3.mp4

I checked GEFS maxes to at least have some hope of a respite, but nope - also shows straight 90s through the end of the run.

Are you seriously asking for people to take fault for failing to accurately predict the future weeks in advance, despite using the best science and guidance available at the time, all because you wanted more snow than you've gotten? Get over it. If you need that kind of accuracy, you need to stay away from this thread and stick to listening to the nice man on the news for your weather forecasts. With long-range forecasting comes great uncertainty. If you can't handle it, move on.

https://x.com/nwsstlouis/status/1758627226227277925?s=46 There’s still hope?

I know its value is limited at this range, but since I like what it shows, I'm sharing it anyway.

ICON. Noise changes mostly but a little improved from 6Z, I think.

3K is pretty similar, too.

Ignore those other silly models. Everyone knows the HRW WRF-ARWHGLTLSGBRBZ is the bee's knees.

Not sure if this was posted or not. Looks good to me!

Of course they are. Hopefully, people here are smart enough to not take these maps literally or as a forecast. But they still lend credibility to a trend toward snowier for many.

Ahem