Cobalt

An incredibly bold prediction to make in this day and age. A warm climate lends itself to warmer than normal temperatures? Tell us more.

You’re really bold predicting that a Super El Niño in 2026 will be warmer than normal. I’m almost in shock, it takes a lot of guts to forecast something like that.

I think it would be best to just have links to there limited in some form. Sometimes they can provide value within other context on this board. Other times I think I'm just on Paul Roundy or Ben Noll's twitter pages on here lol

amwx has a strict limit of 5 twitter links per person per day, obviously

note the gaps in date

Note the date

pepperidge farm remembers

it's okay, we're all wrong sometimes

Do we have equal right to open up a thread for each of the other 3142 counties in the US?

This is simply not true. ChatGPT is a far worse science communicator than many out there. Its writing habits are also quite predictable, to a point where a still-substantial portion of the general public can sense that the vibes are “off” and stop interfacing with the posts entirely. My suggestion would be to narrow the scope of your content and try writing headlines more gripping and information-rich than what ChatGPT can do. It is very much possible, and the reward is that, with enough effort, your unique posts have potential to reach further than 4x the amount of derivative AI posts would be capable of. I guarantee it.

You are very committed to discussing all facets of climate change, and I admire your effort. However, would you possibly be up for moving away from AI usage in your posts? I can't help but see all the hallmarks of it throughout your Twitter page. A lot of it undermines your overall message, and I'm not talking from the energy consumption standpoint, but instead just the overall strength of the rhetoric you and consequently ChatGPT use.

but it is the only 46 years of data we have for this beautiful region of The Great Lakes....so we analyze!!!

It doesn't matter if it's 134 years of climate data from Gibson County, Indiana. It is just one of the 3143 counties in the United States that you are trying to use as the lens from which to view global climate change from. You don't get the right to say that I'm cherrypicking when that is the flimsy pedestal you're standing on.

Do you really want to talk about small sample sizes? Your entire existence on this global climate change board is substantiated by a thread where you talk solely about your county’s climate data. Like, are we being for real?