Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,305
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, lee59 said:

Fortunately for Jamaica the extreme winds only go out about 8 miles from the center. Kingston the capitol may not get into any hurricane force winds but strong tropical storm force winds seems likely. Of course everything depends on eventual path.

Wind is always the least worry in a landfalling hurricane. Storm surge and flooding are top concerns here. 

  • Like 2
  • Weenie 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dan11295 said:

12Z HAFS-A keeps Melissa basically steady state until a 907mb 16z landfall just west of Treasure Beach. HAFS-B has 901 mb landfall a bit tad further west about 13z

Bad tracks not just for the population but those both hit resort areas hard.  Most of them are on the western 1/4 of the island so thats a loss of a big portion of their economy for this winter probably

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

Wind is always the least worry in a landfalling hurricane. Storm surge and flooding are top concerns here. 

Depends on the location.  Jamaica has mostly block structures, which is helpful, but how are the roofs going to fare if this does land as a Cat 4+?  The wind will be very damaging to housing and infrastructure.  The HAFS make me worry about Montego Bay on the NW side.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The visible high res .5k satellite photo shows an insane eye, with the mini vortexes, etc.

blob:https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/23d25d52-a94f-4476-b368-fed4d4c0dc75

The eastern 2/3rds of Jamaica are going to get raked for a prolonged period of time due to it being on the western semi-circle of the hurricane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, nycwinter said:

totally untrue..

In a mountainous island like Jamaica it absolutely is true.  Obviously winds will be devastating at the center, but the biggest impact for the island will be the sheer amount of rainfall from this event that will be exacerbated by topo with mass amounts of fresh water having nowhere to drain during the height of the storm due to surge.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hazwoper said:

In a mountainous island like Jamaica it absolutely is true.  Obviously winds will be devastating at the center, but the biggest impact for the island will be the sheer amount of rainfall from this event that will be exacerbated by topo with mass amounts of fresh water having nowhere to drain during the height of the storm due to surge.  

What will help some is that the mountains have trees, which will help prevent mudslides. If it was a place like Haiti where the mountains have been denuded of trees, there would be massive mudslides, with little or no warning, causing more deaths, and devastation. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hazwoper said:

In a mountainous island like Jamaica it absolutely is true.  Obviously winds will be devastating at the center, but the biggest impact for the island will be the sheer amount of rainfall from this event that will be exacerbated by topo with mass amounts of fresh water having nowhere to drain during the height of the storm due to surge.  

Jamaica's coastline is relatively steep in most places, so the surge is less likely to be a concern.  Rainfall and wind are the big-ticket items here.  This is probably more akin to Maria in PR as anything else.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TriPol said:

I remember we went decades without a category 5. Now it's a regular occurrence. Incredible.

 

"Decades" is a  bit hyperbolic - longest recorded stretch (in the modern-day satellite era at least) with no Cat 5 is 9 years; but yeah they're definitely increasing in frequency.

They generally seem to follow the solar cycles actually, and since we're at the peak of one...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of parallels to Helene in western NC from a flooding standpoint. Somewhat similar topograph/rainfall amounts/duration. Jamaica can probably handle it a little better with heavy rainfall from tropical systems being much more common in that part of the world

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, olafminesaw said:

Lots of parallels to Helene in western NC from a flooding standpoint. Somewhat similar topograph/rainfall amounts/duration. Jamaica can probably handle it a little better with heavy rainfall from tropical systems being much more common in that part of the world

30-40 inches that common in jamaica?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WolfStock1 said:

 

"Decades" is a  bit hyperbolic - longest recorded stretch (in the modern-day satellite era at least) with no Cat 5 is 9 years; but yeah they're definitely increasing in frequency.

They generally seem to follow the solar cycles actually, and since we're at the peak of one...

They do follow the solar cycle, but with an anti-correlation. Extreme tropical cyclones are least likely to occur during the solar maximum.

 

However there's a very strong positive correlation with AGW.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't access radar so I can't see, but it seems to me that the earlier moat that existed has been filled and we don't have any indication of an ERC?

If that is the case, and we do not have an ERC on the table, tonight may actually be the time when Melissa peaks given the diurnal cycle and its impact on the periods of intensification/convective activity we've seen...This structure is as high end as you can get in the basin. 

qfUP3u6.jpeg

It's also worth noting that this is the only part of the basin where something like this is possible. 

ruoPZNL.png

tL84GsE.png

This last image really crystalizes it. As anomalous as it gets for this time of year. 

g8h02YD.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, TriPol said:

I remember we went decades without a category 5. Now it's a regular occurrence. Incredible.

29 minutes ago, NoCORH4L said:

AGW

Wonder if this season's whole quality over quantity thing is a preview of our future seasons thanks to climate hell. I think it fits the general predictions of a little less activity but far more intense. 

  • Weenie 1
  • Disagree 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ATDoel said:

They do follow the solar cycle, but with an anti-correlation. Extreme tropical cyclones are least likely to occur during the solar maximum.

 

However there's a very strong positive correlation with AGW.

Solar maximum years include 1958, 1968, 1979, 1989, 2001, 2014, 2024 (or 2025). Beulah (1967), Camille (1969), David (1979), Allen (1980), Gilbert (1988), Hugo (1989), Beryl (2024) and Milton (2024) occurred within a year of the solar maximum or during the solar maximum.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Solar maximum years include 1958, 1968, 1979, 1989, 2001, 2014, 2024 (or 2025). Beulah (1967), Camille (1969), David (1979), Allen (1980), Gilbert (1988), Hugo (1989), Beryl (2024) and Milton (2024) occurred within a year of the solar maximum or during the solar maximum.

It's been studied.  Effects of Solar Variability on Tropical Cyclone Activity - Nayak - 2024 - Earth and Space Science - Wiley Online Library

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ATDoel said:

Thanks for sharing the link. The paper's explanation is more nuanced than the broader language to which I responded and it covers all basins, not just the Atlantic. Its abstract is sufficient and states:

...extreme TC events with a maximum wind speed of 137 knots and higher (category 5) are most likely to occur during the declining phase of a solar cycle and least likely to occur during the ascending phase or the maximum phase. Although solar activity levels are similar during the declining and ascending phases, the yearly occurrence rate is nearly double in the declining phase (1.123) as compared to that in the ascending phase (0.625).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ATDoel said:

Extreme tropical cyclones are least likely to occur during the solar maximum.

 

Not what I'm seeing (e.g. we're at a peak right now, and we've had five Cat 5's in the last two years).   Spun off a separate thread though so as to not derail this one.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...