Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,617
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

“Cory’s in NYC! Let’s HECS!” Feb. 22-24 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, dryslot said:

Just going on the strength of the SLP will want to get this west a bit.

The strengths may be what helps pull it west if it really wraps up, but of course, then it’s LBSW. Not really our storm, but it could end up being fun for us and epic to our south

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yes, I don't think we are done trending on that...I'm delaying my first map until late night bc I don't have the balls to go with my gut yet.

Well....if it has to snow let's do a repeat of this:    

image.thumb.png.66712f0aace199ee150e5e9a9c62146b.png

 

Sorry, not sorry to those in Western CT and MA.

  • Like 1
  • Crap 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

can see the little fuji here... slightly later phase with more NS involvement leads to later occlusion

0a166d32-3b7a-451f-bdd6-2694861ff794.gif.2ef8bc30a85e08f4dae56436c4c53819.gif

I wrote a tl;dr on page 68 that discusses some of those trough axis idiosyncrasies we've been observing.  I spent ... more time than I responsibly should have ... going over those fundamentals of Met wrt the various guidance sources, and spoke about them in that missive. 

Paraphrase,  there's still NW correction room in this whole thing.

Longer recap:  the S/W ridging that rolls out ahead of trough amplificaiton has been either under done by error, or, just gong to be anomalously weak in this case.  I leaned on the latter in that discussion, just because I couldn't find a guidance that has a better more "balanced" looking roll-out ridge.   But that is an important feature when system's are creating their own positive feedback arena - during life cycle of the total wave space.  The end result of which tends to position the axis farther W than the eastern flank of the trough - which is what all guidance has been consummately doing... 

I also discussed that the ridge west has been relatively well anchored near MT longitude, and the trough has been en masse tending to stretch E. That's also a correctable aspect. 

Your ICON above seems to evince the latter concepts... at least, showing how the total wave geometry matters in this. The ridge in the west is, if anything, nudged W by pubes ...but the trough in the east is also simultaneously availing of the total trough space and not as biased on the eastern flank. 

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Ugh....didn't want any regression pushes this quickly...at least it's still in lala range.

Yeah mesos are still marginal right now for utility. 

 

ICON gives a 20-burger for SE MA/Cape

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said:

Any ocean enhancement with this one? Figured there's always some with a coastal near the benchmark

Delta-Ts aren't particularly big.....esp this time of the year after the type of winter we've had....water temps are chilly. Might be some as the winds turn more northerly and if we can get 850s down to roughly -10C or so....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said:

Jan 15 was colder and stalled for a bit, iirc. This could be a Jan 15 lite, or I guess Jan 22 lite. 

I wasn't here at the time, but I think Sandwich had close to 30" in 2015'

This has easy 30" potential for SEMASS .. I'd be ecstatic if I was there, I'm hoping for sloppy seconds out here..

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...