Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,469
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

Major snowstorm 1/15-16


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said:

18z GFS on the board. That lead wave clears out and our trailer has more space to dig and tilt negatively. Allows easterly flow to kick in. Nice solid event verbatim.

So does this thread cover both scenarios?   

perhaps it should if it doesn't because there's a clear binary dependency going on with these 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

It’s real. She coming, EOR favored, but everyone gets in on it. 

If we get even more separation like the 18z showed, it may allow this thing to explode even more closer to New Jersey giving all of us a nice blow....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Prob a warning event for SE areas that run. Not totally surprising as the 12z GEFS were kind of bullish. 

My gut tells me we're getting clipped by a moderate impact - 

It'll be by a system that "could have" been truly magnificent, but the interference is probably real and will mechanically limit the this lead's ability.  It's well on it's way through hour 90 or so... then, it opens up like that - it opens because there's a non-linear offset.     Not you, but to the general user: that is not something you can "see" on a chart.  It's exposed via behavior - case in point, the unusual opening back up when the totality of the +PNA is still maxing.   There's almost no other explanation for why that does that. 

Here's the thing.. that 2nd wave is entirely assimilated - unless there's been some sort of breakthrough in data gathering that I am less privy to, the source origin of the 2nd wave's guts are out over the Date Line.    If that comes in weaker and/or the timing allows for a bigger gap, the lead will almost certainly grow more intense in lockstep with that correction.  If anyone bothers, go back to the big hit by the GFS yesterday and compare the gap between the previous runs, you can see the big hit run was wider... 

anyway... I think when push comes to shove, the models are not that good?  not enough to project 90% of reality when in this particularly unique situation with sudden onset +d(PNA) and handling too balls in the nut sack. The lead wave space is sampling now, and there's some GEFs and GFS and implications, so it triggering the physics enough in the model

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

The more amplified storm here, completes negates anything two days later. Seems like, as usual, it’s one or the other, or nothing. Not both 

You're right, we might get something we might get nothing ... we might get everything. You covered it all. I wish everyone listened to you.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said:

My focus has been on the ULL and energy south of that that curls up into it.

IMG_0465.thumb.jpeg.10017eb1575ccbfc8419e9072ae4dfe1.jpeg

That lead aspect you annotated there is part of the problem when getting into this ordeal at sub-pattern scale discussion ... it's triggering and then whisking away the dynamics fuel for the lead's engine.   

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

That lead aspect you annotated there is part of the problem when getting into this ordeal at some pattern discussion scales... it's triggering and then whisking away the dynamics fuel for the leads engine.   

Yeah,  I’ve been keeping an eye on that lead wave, seeing if it progresses any faster. I’m also watching to see how our trailer threat amplifies.  If that digs deeper sooner, we can create just enough wave spacing for flow to curl back around. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

The more amplified storm here, completes negates anything two days later. Seems like, as usual, it’s one or the other, or nothing. Not both 

Id rather take my chances with the second one. Wave spacing issues with wave 1 are a real concern. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...