dan11295 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 12Z HAFS-A keeps Melissa basically steady state until a 907mb 16z landfall just west of Treasure Beach. HAFS-B has 901 mb landfall a bit tad further west about 13z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloWeather Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 47 minutes ago, lee59 said: Fortunately for Jamaica the extreme winds only go out about 8 miles from the center. Kingston the capitol may not get into any hurricane force winds but strong tropical storm force winds seems likely. Of course everything depends on eventual path. Wind is always the least worry in a landfalling hurricane. Storm surge and flooding are top concerns here. 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, dan11295 said: 12Z HAFS-A keeps Melissa basically steady state until a 907mb 16z landfall just west of Treasure Beach. HAFS-B has 901 mb landfall a bit tad further west about 13z Bad tracks not just for the population but those both hit resort areas hard. Most of them are on the western 1/4 of the island so thats a loss of a big portion of their economy for this winter probably 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAwx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2:00 PM EDT Mon Oct 27 Location: 16.5°N 78.3°W Moving: WNW at 3 mph Min pressure: 906 mb Max sustained: 175 mph 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycwinter Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said: Wind is always the least worry in a landfalling hurricane. Storm surge and flooding are top concerns here. totally untrue.. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said: Wind is always the least worry in a landfalling hurricane. Storm surge and flooding are top concerns here. Depends on the location. Jamaica has mostly block structures, which is helpful, but how are the roofs going to fare if this does land as a Cat 4+? The wind will be very damaging to housing and infrastructure. The HAFS make me worry about Montego Bay on the NW side. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATDoel Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, nycwinter said: totally untrue.. Wind is a big deal but most people that die in hurricanes is from surge/flooding, not wind. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BretWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Unreal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Melissa has now surpassed Humberto as the strongest hurricane of the 2025 Atlantic hurricane season and has the second lowest minimum pressure in the basin since 2016, right behind Milton. 4 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannabehippie Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago The visible high res .5k satellite photo shows an insane eye, with the mini vortexes, etc. blob:https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/23d25d52-a94f-4476-b368-fed4d4c0dc75 The eastern 2/3rds of Jamaica are going to get raked for a prolonged period of time due to it being on the western semi-circle of the hurricane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hazwoper Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 14 minutes ago, nycwinter said: totally untrue.. In a mountainous island like Jamaica it absolutely is true. Obviously winds will be devastating at the center, but the biggest impact for the island will be the sheer amount of rainfall from this event that will be exacerbated by topo with mass amounts of fresh water having nowhere to drain during the height of the storm due to surge. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wannabehippie Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, hazwoper said: In a mountainous island like Jamaica it absolutely is true. Obviously winds will be devastating at the center, but the biggest impact for the island will be the sheer amount of rainfall from this event that will be exacerbated by topo with mass amounts of fresh water having nowhere to drain during the height of the storm due to surge. What will help some is that the mountains have trees, which will help prevent mudslides. If it was a place like Haiti where the mountains have been denuded of trees, there would be massive mudslides, with little or no warning, causing more deaths, and devastation. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriPol Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I remember we went decades without a category 5. Now it's a regular occurrence. Incredible. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCORH4L Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, TriPol said: I remember we went decades without a category 5. Now it's a regular occurrence. Incredible. AGW 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MN Transplant Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 7 minutes ago, hazwoper said: In a mountainous island like Jamaica it absolutely is true. Obviously winds will be devastating at the center, but the biggest impact for the island will be the sheer amount of rainfall from this event that will be exacerbated by topo with mass amounts of fresh water having nowhere to drain during the height of the storm due to surge. Jamaica's coastline is relatively steep in most places, so the surge is less likely to be a concern. Rainfall and wind are the big-ticket items here. This is probably more akin to Maria in PR as anything else. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfStock1 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, TriPol said: I remember we went decades without a category 5. Now it's a regular occurrence. Incredible. "Decades" is a bit hyperbolic - longest recorded stretch (in the modern-day satellite era at least) with no Cat 5 is 9 years; but yeah they're definitely increasing in frequency. They generally seem to follow the solar cycles actually, and since we're at the peak of one... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olafminesaw Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Lots of parallels to Helene in western NC from a flooding standpoint. Somewhat similar topograph/rainfall amounts/duration. Jamaica can probably handle it a little better with heavy rainfall from tropical systems being much more common in that part of the world 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycwinter Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 9 minutes ago, olafminesaw said: Lots of parallels to Helene in western NC from a flooding standpoint. Somewhat similar topograph/rainfall amounts/duration. Jamaica can probably handle it a little better with heavy rainfall from tropical systems being much more common in that part of the world 30-40 inches that common in jamaica? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATDoel Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 15 minutes ago, WolfStock1 said: "Decades" is a bit hyperbolic - longest recorded stretch (in the modern-day satellite era at least) with no Cat 5 is 9 years; but yeah they're definitely increasing in frequency. They generally seem to follow the solar cycles actually, and since we're at the peak of one... They do follow the solar cycle, but with an anti-correlation. Extreme tropical cyclones are least likely to occur during the solar maximum. However there's a very strong positive correlation with AGW. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I can't access radar so I can't see, but it seems to me that the earlier moat that existed has been filled and we don't have any indication of an ERC? If that is the case, and we do not have an ERC on the table, tonight may actually be the time when Melissa peaks given the diurnal cycle and its impact on the periods of intensification/convective activity we've seen...This structure is as high end as you can get in the basin. It's also worth noting that this is the only part of the basin where something like this is possible. This last image really crystalizes it. As anomalous as it gets for this time of year. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowenOutThere Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 33 minutes ago, TriPol said: I remember we went decades without a category 5. Now it's a regular occurrence. Incredible. 29 minutes ago, NoCORH4L said: AGW Wonder if this season's whole quality over quantity thing is a preview of our future seasons thanks to climate hell. I think it fits the general predictions of a little less activity but far more intense. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKY_WX Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I'm not sure there are many good comparisons on this one other than Maria/PR and Dorian/Bahamas. Everyone knows how those turned out. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, ATDoel said: They do follow the solar cycle, but with an anti-correlation. Extreme tropical cyclones are least likely to occur during the solar maximum. However there's a very strong positive correlation with AGW. Solar maximum years include 1958, 1968, 1979, 1989, 2001, 2014, 2024 (or 2025). Beulah (1967), Camille (1969), David (1979), Allen (1980), Gilbert (1988), Hugo (1989), Beryl (2024) and Milton (2024) occurred within a year of the solar maximum or during the solar maximum. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATDoel Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said: Solar maximum years include 1958, 1968, 1979, 1989, 2001, 2014, 2024 (or 2025). Beulah (1967), Camille (1969), David (1979), Allen (1980), Gilbert (1988), Hugo (1989), Beryl (2024) and Milton (2024) occurred within a year of the solar maximum or during the solar maximum. It's been studied. Effects of Solar Variability on Tropical Cyclone Activity - Nayak - 2024 - Earth and Space Science - Wiley Online Library 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheClimateChanger Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 13 minutes ago, ATDoel said: It's been studied. Effects of Solar Variability on Tropical Cyclone Activity - Nayak - 2024 - Earth and Space Science - Wiley Online Library Thanks for sharing the link. The paper's explanation is more nuanced than the broader language to which I responded and it covers all basins, not just the Atlantic. Its abstract is sufficient and states: ...extreme TC events with a maximum wind speed of 137 knots and higher (category 5) are most likely to occur during the declining phase of a solar cycle and least likely to occur during the ascending phase or the maximum phase. Although solar activity levels are similar during the declining and ascending phases, the yearly occurrence rate is nearly double in the declining phase (1.123) as compared to that in the ascending phase (0.625). 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olafminesaw Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 38 minutes ago, nycwinter said: 30-40 inches that common in jamaica? Of course not, I just mean totals are a 4 standard deviation instead of a 5 standard deviation event, or whatever. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfStock1 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 37 minutes ago, ATDoel said: Extreme tropical cyclones are least likely to occur during the solar maximum. Not what I'm seeing (e.g. we're at a peak right now, and we've had five Cat 5's in the last two years). Spun off a separate thread though so as to not derail this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now