Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,352
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sador0410
    Newest Member
    Sador0410
    Joined

December Medium/Long Range Discussion


yoda
 Share

Recommended Posts

i would wait to call 12/2-3 dead until the nov 30 storm happens. 36 hours out from then and there's still lots discrepancy between models. indy doesn't know whether they're going to get 8 inches of snow or just plain rain rn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WEATHER53 said:

That high  running off Maine just as it starts is no good for 12/2.  
Further west  by 350 miles is needed

100% correct. 

Possible, but the 12-2 system has the deck stacked against it. 

No 50-50 low,  no Lakes to New England H.P. as a cold air source.

And of course, our long time drought pattern that no one fully understands is again an aggravating factor.  The GFS dropped the QPF from 1.48" for Augusta at 06  11-27 to .60" at 06  11-28.  I don't have enough fingers to count how many times this has happened during the past 4 months.   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS vortmax is further north than we'd want based on "my lack of formal training" experience.  Euro is further south, but still not completely ideal.  That's been a trend for the last couple years...northern stream is either too far north or flatting the southern stream.  At this point, I just want a storm that reminds me that we can in fact get a southern stream dominant wave that drops an inch of precip over the region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AO remains positive, but we have intense cold in Canada and a weak PV. 

The MJO and the general progression could show potential Dec 15 th to Jan 5 th for the East Coast. 

>>>

265865631_ao_gefs.sprd2(41).thumb.png.8a00fc81ee872e5fbdbb010cbdd0c0fc.png

 

G6zbtdIXsAALR2J.png.f117a0b8a781acca07f91d41489dc61f.png

 

 

G6ybxhVWoAECoKg.thumb.png.d9004760847949951b2c7d828ebdcc32.png

 

G6yYRfqXMAI21nt.thumb.png.ad7c302bb51ff8a24e88d8bac9eb2be1.png

 

G62FZuTWEAAkbxj.png.418a1677be2c5e8a427957456913b8ef.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

Good to see the MJO crawl through Phase 7, 8, 1. The other year it damn near blasted through over 4 days. 

Yeah, if it rockets through the cold phases, it won't do anything for us. A slow crawl hugging COD would extend cold risk for us.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Yeah, if it rockets through the cold phases, it won't do anything for us. A slow crawl hugging COD would extend cold risk for us.

I believe @GaWx had a detailed post about the benefits of a favorable phase(s) closer to the COD,  versus high amplitude. 

 

  • Like 1
  • yes 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, frd said:

The AO remains positive, but we have intense cold in Canada and a weak PV. 

The MJO and the general progression could show potential Dec 15 th to Jan 5 th for the East Coast. 

>>>

265865631_ao_gefs.sprd2(41).thumb.png.8a00fc81ee872e5fbdbb010cbdd0c0fc.png

 

G6zbtdIXsAALR2J.png.f117a0b8a781acca07f91d41489dc61f.png

 

 

G6ybxhVWoAECoKg.thumb.png.d9004760847949951b2c7d828ebdcc32.png

 

G6yYRfqXMAI21nt.thumb.png.ad7c302bb51ff8a24e88d8bac9eb2be1.png

 

G62FZuTWEAAkbxj.png.418a1677be2c5e8a427957456913b8ef.png

That's not a bad look for the MJO if that were to materialize. Having it decay in Phase 8 and enter the COD opens the door for more prolonged cold and semi-active periods. Hopefully this is a sticky forecast. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, MillvilleWx said:

AIFS and ECWMF are in closer proxy to each other wrt handling the 5H pattern. A little flatter and confluence better for here, however the HP to the north isn't as pronounced compared to GFS/CMC which would play a role into the antecedent airmass domain the storm would attack. Guess is the GFS/CMC are too amped at the moment and will likely shift closer to the AIFS/ECENS combo. This has climo, fall line type event written all over it. Early in the season for the lowlands.

Mentioned this yesterday and I haven't wavered on this forecast yet. I feel any wintry precip in the region will be confined northwest of the fall line. The key is the timing of the HP movement to the east and the the low attack. A few days ago, we had a little more stay in the HP to the north which would offset some of the warm advection from prevailing southeast flow and provide a deeper wedge to break through. Now the high is shifting east and in a classic spot for a positive u-vector wind anomaly to take shape earlier, eroding CAD prior to approach of the main precip field. Magnitude of cold is subjective, so it's plausible the wedge is deeper than advertised from the preceding pattern, or the low isn't as robust and doesn't have the stronger boundary layer WAA regime materialize making it easier for the cold to remain. The fact stands that the current forecast would yield little wintry precip for the lowlands and is shaping to be a classic elevation/longitudinal type pattern for the area. Further north and west, the better the chance. EC AIFS and AIFS-ENS are still in pretty good agreement on some low-end threat for snow/sleet prior to the setup yielding all rain for the area. Would need a massive shift in the HP to the north about 200-350 miles further west as @WEATHER53 alluded to in a recent post. Still super early in the season, so it's just nice to have something trackable at this point instead of watching temps in the 50s and 60s and swatting mosquitos into December. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...