Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,029
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

October Comes Early: Late September Multi-Hazard Hybrid Storm


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

Broadly conceptualizing ...

Baroclinic systems expand there influence due to frontal synoptic forcing... and temperature gradient related mechanics.  

Barotropic tropical systems are by physics drawn to core

... this thing's going for Category 3 intensity with that NAM look there - probably a erroneous solution. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Yeah, for those following--this was never going to be purely tropical. We're talking about possibly a shallow warm core system. To be tropical it would need to shed the fronts it's attached to. But the title is what it is for a reason. We're talking hybrid here or maybe subtropical if things break right. Convection near the center, banding features, etc..

All that is still on the table once this really ramps up later today and tonight. As it stands however, we're all systems go. Good pressure falls are underway and our storm is organizing right where we want it. 

R6jXsMm.gif

22rtBrP.png

 

Big rainfall is still on the table along with significant winds especially along the coast. Euro is still most robust between it and the GFS on 925mb winds. Close call for mixing on the soundings. 

dP8LITe.gif

There's irony this hour ... because while I essentially agree that this was never tropical this, that, nor the other d-drip worthy ...the NAM is actually attempting to perform one of the most rapid conversions to purer tropical core and even RI cycling than has ever been observed or even thought plausible in the Terran physical manifold.  LOL

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Yeah, the NAM's pretty much going 90th percentile full profile conversion straight to a tropical entity with that solution

As such, it's contracting 

3k has 3” PWATS and saturated 0C at 500mb near the center. :lol:

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OrangeCTWX said:

Did the NAMS initialize way too strong or am I making things up? I doubt this is currently a 988mb storm.

Correct

did that at 06 z too. 

Looks like there's a low out there ~ 995 mb, replete with a bent back warm front and dangling cold boundary, yet the NAM-aramadingdong thinks it's a 985 Cat 1 hurricane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ginx snewx said:

Tolland CT and Stonington CT 

Screenshot_20260925_073315_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20260925_073732_Chrome.jpg

What app/website is this from?

I'm impressed that it has estimates from most major modeling systems.

My only issue with it: mean(53.7+23.4+42.1+20.2+51.2+23.5+58.4+27.4+43.2+20.4+41.2+21.7+41.8+23.5) == 35.1mph

I'm not sure where they're getting 17.8mph from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know ...there are certain things the NAM is good at - though they seldom if ever opportune to showcase for this forum. Namely, 'convective initiation'  

Another thing, I really like looking at the FOUS grid before winter storms.   I know it's error and idiosyncratics.  I apply those second nature on the fly and find those numerical aspects to be hugely useful for interpolating weather aspects. 

So it will be missed.    I'm not trying to defend it's synoptic horror show ...particularly beyond 48 hours, no.  But when this model goes away, there will be no FOUS gridded product from these other models to be acquainted with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MegaMike said:

What app/website is this from?

I'm impressed that it has estimates from most major modeling systems.

My only issue with it: mean(53.7+23.4+42.1+20.2+51.2+23.5+58.4+27.4+43.2+20.4+41.2+21.7+41.8+23.5) == 35.1mph

I'm not sure where they're getting 17.8mph from.

Paging @Ginx snewx

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will shift north about 50-100 miles if every global is correct, take the blend and since the “trend is your friend”, this will rival the blizzard of 1978, minus the cold. Usually, anomalously cold temps and a kiss of tropical air are not forecasted well.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...