Ji Posted yesterday at 05:25 AM Share Posted yesterday at 05:25 AM lol the end of the gfs was gonna be somethingYea. A heartbreaking snow to ice to rain cutter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted yesterday at 06:00 AM Share Posted yesterday at 06:00 AM Getting closer 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 07:06 AM Share Posted yesterday at 07:06 AM 1 hour ago, bncho said: hey chuck, how do you like that 585 dm over alaska? Hopefully it stays north. Models have trended in the last few days to more of a N. Pacific ridge, the EPS is well south of the GFS/GEFS, and has higher verification scores I think. -PNA keeps the jet stream a little too far north, although if the ridge extends well into Alaska we can get some colder weather. I would love that though, -EPO's are the coldest pattern and I always wanted to experience a tropical-cutoff block! For big snowstorms though, a gulf of alaska/south of aleutian 500mb low pressure is the greatest correlation, along with a 50/50 low. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 08:50 AM Share Posted yesterday at 08:50 AM This doesn't look bad The jet stream is dry though. Still watching the late January period, because CPC has below average in the Northeast for January, and we are likely to be pretty solidly above by the 16th. 3-4 week on the CPC is also colder than average. It's looking like we won't have a -NAO, unless models are biased from the last 14 years of having Winter +NAO, which has happened already in Dec and early Jan. So we'll have to lift that n. pacific ridge into the EPO/WPO domain for the colder stuff to verify most likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 09:04 AM Share Posted yesterday at 09:04 AM I don't know, this looks kind of ugly to me in the mean. I think the only way those surface temps will verify is if we are right after a cold front, unless a few individual members are weighting the mean. Maybe those few outlier members will win and the Pacific ridge will trend more Polar? GEFS has more -WPO at 384hr so that's a little better. The ENSO subsurface is starting to warm with a kelvin wave, and I did research showing that, that actually correlates to more +PNA when the subsurface at -200m hits 180W. That should happen in the next few weeks.. Just using that favors less -pna and more +pna going into the extended, but that's just one method. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dailylurker Posted yesterday at 11:40 AM Share Posted yesterday at 11:40 AM It looks like the gfs brings winter back towards the end of the run. Hopefully we can get some moisture. It's bone dry for January. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BristowWx Posted yesterday at 12:02 PM Share Posted yesterday at 12:02 PM 19 minutes ago, dailylurker said: It looks like the gfs brings winter back towards the end of the run. Hopefully we can get some moisture. It's bone dry for January. I gotta admit I was really getting spoiled in early Dec with snow and rumors of snow. it was a glorious late fall. Now that winter is really here it feels normal again...comfortable like a old shoe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormy Posted yesterday at 12:15 PM Share Posted yesterday at 12:15 PM 7 hours ago, winter_warlock said: And these are the days of our lives.. This is MacDonald Carey......................................................................................... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
konksw Posted yesterday at 01:57 PM Share Posted yesterday at 01:57 PM Hoping for the torch if it doesn’t snow, nothing worse than 40 and dry. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted yesterday at 02:27 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:27 PM overnight models were a disaster again i see 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM 32 minutes ago, konksw said: Hoping for the torch if it doesn’t snow, nothing worse than 40 and dry. Please no 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terpeast Posted yesterday at 02:35 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:35 PM Both gfs and euro take a few shots at us after Jan 11. Ensembles look fine. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM 2 minutes ago, Terpeast said: Both gfs and euro take a few shots at us after Jan 11. Ensembles look fine. the Euro ensemble snow mean map is .06 for ashburn. That would make 01-02 proud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSSN+ Posted yesterday at 02:52 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:52 PM 14 minutes ago, Ji said: the Euro ensemble snow mean map is .06 for ashburn. That would make 01-02 proud Snow ensemble maps mean nothing at range. Seen them show tons of snow and we have got none. It matter when they start to show something for an aural storm inside 5 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krs4Lfe Posted yesterday at 02:54 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:54 PM 15 minutes ago, Ji said: the Euro ensemble snow mean map is .06 for ashburn. That would make 01-02 proud I think the dryness is a symptom of a very disjointed northern and southern streams. Back in the 2010s, colder anomalies over the east meant more storminess because the northern stream would dip and the southern stream would amplify and cause big storms. This decade, it just means cold and dry because the Northern stream keeps outpacing the southern stream. Largely due to a fast pacific flow exacerbated by yearly record marine heatwaves in northwest pacific 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted yesterday at 02:56 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:56 PM if i took a shot every time i heard "fast flow" i would have been dead back in 2023 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted yesterday at 03:07 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:07 PM Once again the brunt of the warmup is to our west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted yesterday at 03:09 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:09 PM 12 minutes ago, TSSN+ said: Snow ensemble maps mean nothing at range. Seen them show tons of snow and we have got none. It matter when they start to show something for an aural storm inside 5 days. I’m actually with Ji and Chuck on this one. The means don’t mean everything but they can give clues and if you look under the hood the reason the temps aren’t warmer is due to dry cold shots behind cutters and frontal passages. When it’s wet it’s warm across almost every single member. I’ve been away and haven’t really dig into anything for 2 weeks but when I did last night for the first time my initial reaction was yuck. And disappointed, I expected a better January. The good news is it’s not a no hope pattern. Yea as is it’s not good with waves to our north then cold dry periods. The dreaded warm wet cold dry. But some minor shifts and it becomes possible to get snow. So I’m not saying January is cooked. But the actual snow prospects aren’t as good as the pretty h5 and surface temp means look if you dig deeper. 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted yesterday at 03:12 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:12 PM 1 minute ago, psuhoffman said: I’m actually with Ji and Chuck on this one. The means don’t mean everything but they can give clues and if you look under the hood the reason the temps aren’t warmer is due to dry cold shots behind cutters and frontal passages. When it’s wet it’s warm across almost every single member. I’ve been away and haven’t really dig into anything for 2 weeks but when I did last night for the first time my initial reaction was yuck. And disappointed, I expected a better January. The good news is it’s not a no hope pattern. Yea as is it’s not good with waves to our north then cold dry periods. The dreaded warm wet cold dry. But some minor shifts and it becomes possible to get snow. So I’m not saying January is cooked. But the actual snow prospects aren’t as good as the pretty h5 and surface temp means look if you dig deeper. The focus has been on the 2nd half of the month for a couple weeks now. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted yesterday at 03:13 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:13 PM 18 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said: I think the dryness is a symptom of a very disjointed northern and southern streams. Back in the 2010s, colder anomalies over the east meant more storminess because the northern stream would dip and the southern stream would amplify and cause big storms. This decade, it just means cold and dry because the Northern stream keeps outpacing the southern stream. Largely due to a fast pacific flow exacerbated by yearly record marine heatwaves in northwest pacific It’s pretty evident just looking at the h5 maps. It’s been difficult to get a shortwave under our latitude. Probably need both the Pacific and Atlantic to cooperate better. I’m not convinced it’s one or the other, though would obviously make sense that the Pacific is more important for the overall jet stream. If there’s blocking, but a steroidal NS, then I guess we end up with an array of clippers that lack a gulf tap. If the Pac relaxes and we get a healthy ejection of energy from the SW, but no blocking, then we end up on the warm side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krs4Lfe Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:17 PM 1 minute ago, 87storms said: It’s pretty evident just looking at the h5 maps. It’s been difficult to get a shortwave under our latitude. Probably need both the Pacific and Atlantic to cooperate better. I’m not convinced it’s one or the other, though would obviously make sense that the Pacific is more important for the overall jet stream. If there’s blocking, but a steroidal NS, then I guess we end up with an array of clippers that lack a gulf tap. If the Pac relaxes and we get a healthy ejection of energy from the SW, but no blocking, then we end up on the warm side? Exactly. The northern stream and southern stream need to be timed perfectly in order to amplify without the suppression risks and the cutter risks that we've seen this entire decade (aside from 2021 and January 2022). While we were admittedly spoiled in the 2000s and 2010s, I don't consider this a reversion to the mean, I consider this to be part of a larger climatological problem (though I suppose that's discussion for another thread.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted yesterday at 03:26 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:26 PM Snow ensemble maps mean nothing at range. Seen them show tons of snow and we have got none. It matter when they start to show something for an aural storm inside 5 days. Highly disagree 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted yesterday at 03:32 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:32 PM Dont really get the angst. This mornings gfs run was pretty decent. We are going to see threats pop up in the short term imo. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfoman Posted yesterday at 03:51 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:51 PM 8 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: Dont really get the angst. This mornings gfs run was pretty decent. We are going to see threats pop up in the short term imo. Agreed! And it's coming more in range, we're just outside of 200 hrs now with the onset of the 14th threat window. I don't think you can ask for more at this point in time than PNA spike in an optimal initial position out west with a few southern stream vorts dancing around a potential phasing situation. As it ALWAYS has been, we just need to get a little lucky. I don't expect ensembles to show huge totals until the details consolidate, but encouraging to see the amount of offshore coastal show up on the GEFS/EPS increase for 0Z. We've survived 5 days of 2026 without a distinct threat to follow, we can handle another few days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM 24 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: Dont really get the angst. This mornings gfs run was pretty decent. We are going to see threats pop up in the short term imo. Realistically, legit "interest" begins mid month. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM 24 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: Dont really get the angst. This mornings gfs run was pretty decent. We are going to see threats pop up in the short term imo. Agreed. Ji is just being Ji. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted yesterday at 04:00 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:00 PM In a new post, JB states there will be a 5-7 day window for an east coast storm but then we will wait until February with the MJO going into Phase 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted yesterday at 04:05 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:05 PM 2 minutes ago, Weather Will said: In a new post, JB states there will be a 5-7 day window for an east coast storm but then we will wait until February with the MJO going into Phase 6. January forecast sounds about right. Who knows on February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM Latest WB EPS extended for first two weeks of February show below normal temps and normal precipitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted yesterday at 04:15 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:15 PM 3 minutes ago, Weather Will said: Latest WB EPS extended for first two weeks of February show below normal temps and normal precipitation. Not so sure I buy temps. Precip....yes. Anything other than AN can be believed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now