yoda Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Irma moving NW at hr 48 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 It's practically splitting 18z and 12z runs so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 A bit east of 18z position at 48. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Msalgado Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 I'll be very intersted to see how large the eye is after the EWRC is complete. It seems to be much larger via MW imagery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 00z GFS could end up slightly east, but it's not handling the northeast trough like the NAM. If anything, it may be slightly more progressive with it compared to the last run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 The GFS is running a shade to the north and east of its 18z run. It is running well to the south and west of the NAM, which should put to rest the speculation concerning the NAM. Differences with the NAM: 24 hours: About 30 miles (SW of the NAM) 36 hours: About 70 miles (SW of the NAM) 48 hours: About 130 miles (SW of the NAM) Between 9/8 12z and 9/9 0z, the GFS shows Irma's central pressure falling by 28 mb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopplerWx Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 at 63 looks like a direct landfall over miami. a tick east of 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 GFS is coming a bit ne, but its noise- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo762 Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Msalgado said: I'll be very intersted to see how large the eye is after the EWRC is complete. It seems to be much larger via MW imagery. Final step in the EWRC will be the shrinking of the new eye. Probably 25% or so larger nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbullsfan Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 does anybody think that the second turn to the NW can occur a little sooner possibly and skirt the pa handle or possible even re-enter the golf and have a 2nd lf along the gulf coast. It seems the models are getting closer and closer to this possibility each run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rtd208 Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Another DT (WxRisk) Irma update. https://www.wxrisk.com/its-florida-and-miami-is-in-big-trouble/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Models are really keying in on the period before landfall in SE FL for another round of strengthening. Hopefully that's wrong. I guess shear won't get to it until it's too late. 90F bath water in that area will allow it to go kaboom if other conditions allow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted September 8, 2017 Author Share Posted September 8, 2017 You know what....not much difference at h5 between the NAM and GFS hours 54-60. The problem is that the NAM is too far North compared to reality which puts it in a better spot to get picked up than reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdgwx Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Msalgado said: I'll be very intersted to see how large the eye is after the EWRC is complete. It seems to be much larger via MW imagery. That's really old. Here's the latest. As you can see the ERC is nearly complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Def trying to hang back some energy to phase in over the MA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeselandSkies Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Down to 897 at hour 54. Almost certainly overdone but it's just about inevitable that Irma will be at minimum a solid Cat 4 upon landfall, barring a miracle unforeseen by any model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye05 Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Apologies if this is banter, but I've been looking through damage pics and videos of the Tortola damage, and there is legitimate debarking of trees. I have never seen that before with tropical cyclone damage. I've seen a lot of defoliated trees that were misidentified as debarked trees in past events, but never the real deal like this time with Irma. This storm is a completely different animal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAwx Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 This is still a horrific run for MIA and SE FLA. Massive surge and wind impacts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaguars Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Oh South Florida my childhood home. Not looking good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburns Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 17 minutes ago, ny10019 said: hate to think of what will happen near Lake Okeechobee, too. Not a lot of talk about that, but somewhat similar to the Okeechobee Hurricane back in the 20's (albeit now they have better levee systems) I suspect there will still be quite a surge there also. Not much better. this is from a risk assessment report by Lloyd's. That explains the spelling if dike(dyke). Potential for dike failure of the Herbert Hoover Dike In the 1970’s, the decision was taken to increase the upper limit of water in the lake from 15.5 feet to 17.5 feet. And this brings us to the key concern; the dyke is no longer being used solely as a levee to protect the area from flooding when storms are in the vicinity but also to hold a permanent reserve of water. The lake is being used as a reservoir and therefore the dyke is now operating as a dam. This means that water is pushing against the dyke nearly all of the time and that the risk does not come solely from a hurricane event. The dyke must act like a normal reservoir, i.e. be able to safely store floodwaters without overtopping. The dyke was built from un-compacted earth, made up of naturally porous materials such as peat, gravel, sand and shell and is therefore prone to leaks. Since the construction of the dyke, the land outside of the dyke has been eroding, particularly on the south side of the lake. The Herbert Hoover Dike, when built, was never intended to be used in this way and it has only recently been designated to be a dam. The flood criterion for dams is far more stringent than that which it has previously been subject to and also to which it is currently able to meet. In their Expert Review Panel Report, prepared for the South Florida Water Management District in 2006, Bromwell, Dean and Vick describe the basic problem facing the dyke to be “simple”. They say: “Certain geologic formations that underlie the dyke, and portions of the material that comprise it, bear a striking resemblance to Swiss cheese. Laced with interconnected voids and open channels, not only do these materials conduct large flows of water, they also admit sand and silt-sized soil particles that comprise the bulk of the dyke and its foundation. In a process of unstable feedback called internal erosion or piping, this seepage causes more particles to be removed, which in turn causes more seepage. Eventually, either excessive water pressures cause the dyke slopes to fail, or the dyke simply collapses from the net effect of particle removal one grain at a time. Herbert Hoover Dike has narrowly escaped failure from this process on several occasions and we suspect that its condition may be worsening.” The situation is exacerbated by the erosion of the land outside of the lake. In this respect Bromwell commented to the Floridian press: “The important factor is the seeping going from the lake to the land side. The lower the land side, the greater the difference and the greater the seeping is.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 The 00z GFS was virtually identical to 18z at landfall. The gap between it and the NAM really started to widen at hr 54. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psv88 Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Does the eye come inland on the GFS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Msalgado Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, bdgwx said: That's really old. Here's the latest. As you can see the ERC is nearly complete. Not sure why the full gif I linked isn't showing, but yeah, the last frame of the the gif is the scan you posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said: You know what....not much difference at h5 between the NAM and GFS hours 54-60. The problem is that the NAM is too far North compared to reality which puts it in a better spot to get picked up than reality. I don't know... I'd say that's a *fairly* significant difference in handling the trough considering the relatively short lead time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David-LI Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 I'm hoping for a NAM solution or this will be a complete disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJwx85 Posted September 8, 2017 Author Share Posted September 8, 2017 1 minute ago, psv88 said: Does the eye come inland on the GFS? Yes, near Marathon Key and then right up US-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPAwx Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Riding right on the FLA east coast. This is an awful run and will be terrible for GA/western SC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopplerWx Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 hugging the fl coast thru 84, maybe a tick faster than 18z but pretty close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterymix Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Even though GFS brings the core across Miami and straddles the coast, the pressure drops a bit per GFS from around 970 mb to 967 mb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 This is full of lots of woah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.