Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,469
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

Major snowstorm 1/15-16


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

Just totally opposite of it ensembles . Toss 

We’ll see what the EPS looks like this run. There was a ton of spread on the 12z eps so this type of solution is within the envelope. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, George001 said:

I know he’s negative a lot, but I don’t think Tblizz is being unreasonable here. I also want to see more support from other guidance before buying in, and the wave spacing is a real limitation. 

There are a lot of possible issues. Latching on to the one model with a storm is always a risky play IMO.

Its day 4, you’d like to see some legit solutions 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

There are a lot of possible issues. Latching on to the one model with a storm is always a risky play IMO.

Its day 4, you’d like to see some legit solutions 

If obviously the right call if you were making a bet. Still some time for other models to come around at least. Low/Non Zero chance the GEFS are sniffing out something..we'll see about the EPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RDRY said:

I'm not a weather history savant like many on here, but I can't recall a greater 500 vs. surface discrepancy for a coastal.

Not the exact same setup but seeing some of these paltry depictions despite a deep closed ULL to our south reminds me a bit of the model fumbling prior to 2/15/15. The 18z euro is not included in that because that was so much further north than any other recent runs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Not the exact same setup but seeing some of these paltry depictions despite a deep closed ULL to our south reminds me a bit of the model fumbling prior to 2/15/15. The 18z euro is not included in that because that was so much further north than any other recent runs.  

You can feel the models searching for something, but just can't quite see it... or figure what to key in on, seemingly more than usual. Definitely an interesting system to track 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Not the exact same setup but seeing some of these paltry depictions despite a deep closed ULL to our south reminds me a bit of the model fumbling prior to 2/15/15. The 18z euro is not included in that because that was so much further north than any other recent runs.  

Not a bad analog, but that harkens back to what I was saying about the western ridge....notice it looks more like the 18z GFS suite than it does some of those other runs that are positively tilted sw to ne.

AVvXsEgBlfHPzwIZ6gr-axud0BZDzVKsufYXAyUS

This is what I hate...see the difference?

AVvXsEi3XPf48Lnz-vjOMFdzsE-2f2U9ujjdcs8_

Notice 18z GEFS look more like 2/15/15 than this last image.

image.png.2ab33151afcff6cc15fe57e2cd1b8e88.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Not a bad analog, but that harkens back to what I was saying about the western ridge....notice it looks more like the 18z GFS suite than it does some of those other runs that are positively tilted sw to ne.

AVvXsEgBlfHPzwIZ6gr-axud0BZDzVKsufYXAyUS

This is what I hate...see the difference?

AVvXsEi3XPf48Lnz-vjOMFdzsE-2f2U9ujjdcs8_

Notice 18z GEFS look more like 2/15/15 than this last image.

image.png.2ab33151afcff6cc15fe57e2cd1b8e88.png

@Ginx snewxGive me a ridge like the first and 3rd image, then H5 matters....second image is when it's more futile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...