LongBeachSurfFreak Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 On 4/14/2023 at 9:49 PM, coastalplainsnowman said: Being inside one year now for the April 8th solar eclipse, I'm thinking of looking to book a room someplace in western new york directly in the path. I was wondering if anyone has thoughts on where might be a good town to visit? Trying to find someplace that will have some decent hotels but enough off the beaten path that it won't be jam packed, and also on the southern edge of the track.. Any advice would be much appreciated! Western NY is a tuff place for clouds. I would try to find an area that downslopes on a westerly flow. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 6 hours ago, LongBeachSurfFreak said: Western NY is a tuff place for clouds. I would try to find an area that downslopes on a westerly flow. I'd head to Vermont honestly. Anything close to the great lakes could have issues with clouds as you note 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongBeachSurfFreak Posted April 17, 2023 Share Posted April 17, 2023 3 hours ago, Brian5671 said: I'd head to Vermont honestly. Anything close to the great lakes could have issues with clouds as you note Exactly, honestly you would have the best chance on the west slopes of the greens on top of one of the ski resorts. This way if there is valley fog/clouds your above the inversion. If there is a storm on the east coast then obviously all bets are off. I would stay mobile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastalplainsnowman Posted April 23, 2023 Share Posted April 23, 2023 Hard to believe that on this day in 2020 our last snow sighting was still 16 days away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted April 24, 2023 Share Posted April 24, 2023 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 Today was a historic day in Spain. A new national and European April record high temperature was set. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 Any bets on when Joe Bastardi starts the delusional ranting that this El Niño is really “west-based” or a “Modoki in disguise” and uses 57-58, 76-77, 02-03 and 09-10 as his “analogs”? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted April 27, 2023 Share Posted April 27, 2023 32 minutes ago, snowman19 said: Any bets on when Joe Bastardi starts the delusional ranting that this El Niño is really “west-based” or a “Modoki in disguise” and uses 57-58, 76-77, 02-03 and 09-10 as his “analogs”? At least he's admitting that using analogs from colder eras is a non starter.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etudiant Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 9 hours ago, donsutherland1 said: Today was a historic day in Spain. A new national and European April record high temperature was set. They are also in a multi year dry spell so their reservoirs are seriously depleted. This is supposed to be their rainy season, so they face a difficult summer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 9 hours ago, snowman19 said: Any bets on when Joe Bastardi starts the delusional ranting that this El Niño is really “west-based” or a “Modoki in disguise” and uses 57-58, 76-77, 02-03 and 09-10 as his “analogs”? I wouldn't bet against his using the strong 57-58 and 9-10 eventually, but we'll see. Meanwhile, in his continuing fight against recognizing the scientifically proven existence of significant GW from AGW, he did put this out tonight (see Tweet below). He keeps insisting that oceans have warmed from the bottom up via geothermal input rather than from the top down via AGW. He's saying that the atmosphere is warming due to the oceans rather than the reverse meaning he's saying GW is mainly from increased underwater geothermal input. One thing he's failing to recognize is that excess sulfur emissions were likely hiding GW during the 1960s-1970s. Also, if I'm not mistaken, CO2 didn't accelerate markedly until after 1970: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTA66 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 17 hours ago, Brian5671 said: At least he's admitting that using analogs from colder eras is a non starter.... Whoa...wait...WHAT?? You just made me spit coffee out my nose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 9 hours ago, GaWx said: I wouldn't bet against his using the strong 57-58 and 9-10 eventually, but we'll see. Meanwhile, in his continuing fight against recognizing the scientifically proven existence of significant GW from AGW, he did put this out tonight (see Tweet below). He keeps insisting that oceans have warmed from the bottom up via geothermal input rather than from the top down via AGW. He's saying that the atmosphere is warming due to the oceans rather than the reverse meaning he's saying GW is mainly from increased underwater geothermal input. One thing he's failing to recognize is that excess sulfur emissions were likely hiding GW during the 1960s-1970s. Also, if I'm not mistaken, CO2 didn't accelerate markedly until after 1970: It’s sad. He either doesn’t know what the greenhouse effect is/the properties of greenhouse gases or he is deliberately posting misleading information. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FPizz Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 9 hours ago, GaWx said: I wouldn't bet against his using the strong 57-58 and 9-10 eventually, but we'll see. Meanwhile, in his continuing fight against recognizing the scientifically proven existence of significant GW from AGW, he did put this out tonight (see Tweet below). He keeps insisting that oceans have warmed from the bottom up via geothermal input rather than from the top down via AGW. He's saying that the atmosphere is warming due to the oceans rather than the reverse meaning he's saying GW is mainly from increased underwater geothermal input. One thing he's failing to recognize is that excess sulfur emissions were likely hiding GW during the 1960s-1970s. Also, if I'm not mistaken, CO2 didn't accelerate markedly until after 1970: There are a few papers that have this as their main conclusion, so he chooses to believe those over 1000s of others.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted April 29, 2023 Share Posted April 29, 2023 I wouldn't bet against his using the strong 57-58 and 9-10 eventually, but we'll see. Meanwhile, in his continuing fight against recognizing the scientifically proven existence of significant GW from AGW, he did put this out tonight (see Tweet below). He keeps insisting that oceans have warmed from the bottom up via geothermal input rather than from the top down via AGW. He's saying that the atmosphere is warming due to the oceans rather than the reverse meaning he's saying GW is mainly from increased underwater geothermal input. One thing he's failing to recognize is that excess sulfur emissions were likely hiding GW during the 1960s-1970s. Also, if I'm not mistaken, CO2 didn't accelerate markedly until after 1970: There is absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever he will be using 57-58, 02-03, 09-10 and probably 76-77 as analogs, just like he does every year there is an El Niño. It’s mental illness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted April 29, 2023 Share Posted April 29, 2023 1-8" and 2-10" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted April 30, 2023 Share Posted April 30, 2023 19 hours ago, snowman19 said: There is absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever he will be using 57-58, 02-03, 09-10 and probably 76-77 as analogs, just like he does every year there is an El Niño. It’s mental illness https://www.weatherbell.com/video/the-saturday-summary-13214956?full Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted April 30, 2023 Share Posted April 30, 2023 20 hours ago, Rjay said: 1-8" and 2-10" haha got to love spring snow--8 inches on the grass inch of slop on the road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted April 30, 2023 Share Posted April 30, 2023 Reminder to usual suspects to enter May temperature forecast contest in the general weather forum. Admirals also welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 Wow so lucky 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted May 3, 2023 Share Posted May 3, 2023 This has been such a wonderful spring thus far. AC has only come on 2 times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravitylover Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 On 5/3/2023 at 6:20 PM, Nibor said: This has been such a wonderful spring thus far. AC has only come on 2 times. Yeah but the heat is still on. Yuck. You can keep it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 3 hours ago, gravitylover said: Yeah but the heat is still on. Yuck. You can keep it. Bruh how weak are you that your heat has been on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravitylover Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 With overnight temps in the 40s it's kind of necessary, even 50s makes this fat old old body achy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rclab Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 1 hour ago, gravitylover said: With overnight temps in the 40s it's kind of necessary, even 50s makes this fat old old body achy. Good morning gravity. If you can still feel the aches and tell the tale, you’re doing fine. Stay well, as always ….. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted May 6, 2023 Share Posted May 6, 2023 17 hours ago, gravitylover said: With overnight temps in the 40s it's kind of necessary, even 50s makes this fat old old body achy. And people say the younger generations are weak. No hate friend 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishRob17 Posted May 6, 2023 Share Posted May 6, 2023 23 hours ago, Nibor said: Bruh how weak are you that your heat has been on? Says the guy who ran his AC already... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted May 6, 2023 Share Posted May 6, 2023 3 hours ago, IrishRob17 said: Says the guy who ran his AC already... Y’all don’t wanna smell my sweat. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volcanic Winter Posted May 9, 2023 Share Posted May 9, 2023 On 5/6/2023 at 7:46 AM, IrishRob17 said: Says the guy who ran his AC already... My AC’s been on since March . … I do have severe allergic rhinitis though, I can’t open the windows or my nasal passages turn to a cement brick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pellice Posted May 14, 2023 Share Posted May 14, 2023 Yesterday, May 13, was NJ's World Series of Birding, held annually on the second Saturday in May (and now part of a larger "Big Day" of birding observed globally. It was the 40th anniversary of the event, which was begun around the peak of spring bird migration and involves counting every species seen. The total in NJ routinely goes over 200 species. As you can imagine, the event is HEAVILY influenced by weather, and yesterday saw the first good weather system in five years. (2020 saw snow in some areas!) Ideal is overnight southwesterly winds, since most songbirds migrate at night, with a light rain shower right at dawn to bring them down. Warm fronts from the southwest in spring have been very scarce these last years, but this stretch around May 5 has produced in northern Jersey! And more migration weather to come this week! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now