• Member Statistics

    16,105
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    corvairbob
    Newest Member
    corvairbob
    Joined
Sign in to follow this  
ORH_wxman

Winter 2020-2021

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

That was the retro-storm that rained on most of New England and gave NYC like 20" of snow (though the first phase of it was a huge wet snowstorm for interior SNE up to NNE)....but up there the snow never really changed over....those easterly and even southeasterly flow events seem to absolutely dump on Randolph....I've noticed a lot of marginal storms there where they get like 2-3" of QPF and 30" of snow while 10-20 miles away probably didn't get much. That was probably an example of the terrain upsloping enough from the east to keep it a wet snow bomb.

Several mountain areas that do well on easterly flow stayed snow on that one across NNE.

This is from an old Randolph site, 68" on 8" of qpf, mostly over 5 days :lol:

randolph.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I don’t begrudge the rage.  Heck, I’ve had great personal losses including my parents and only sibling but 12/30/00 is right up there...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, weathafella said:

And I don’t begrudge the rage.  Heck, I’ve had great personal losses including my parents and only sibling but 12/30/00 is right up there...

You had 12/30/00 PTSD in the 1/12/11 thread....you got convinced you were screwed. Here's where it starts, but the real melt happens a couple pages later.

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, weathafella said:

And I don’t begrudge the rage.  Heck, I’ve had great personal losses including my parents and only sibling but 12/30/00 is right up there...

Wasn't that storm more of a bust for the mid-Atlantic? It was supposed to be a big one in DC/Baltimore, probably 8-12" or so, but then it bypassed us completely while NYC and Philly ended the millennium with a major storm.

I'm guessing up this way it may have tracked too close and become a rainer. It was a very compact storm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Fozz said:

Wasn't that storm more of a bust for the mid-Atlantic? It was supposed to be a big one in DC/Baltimore, probably 8-12" or so, but then it bypassed us completely while NYC and Philly ended the millennium with a major storm.

I'm guessing up this way it may have tracked too close and become a rainer. It was a very compact storm.

It was a pretty good storm over interior SNE. About 6-10" west of 128/I-95 but there was a big dryslot which prevented much higher totals. Areas a bit closer to NYC in southwest CT got over a foot and also NW CT/far Western MA where they avoided the dryslot for longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wx2fish said:

This is from an old Randolph site, 68" on 8" of qpf, mostly over 5 days :lol:

randolph.PNG

Must be fake snow, look at 50” of snowfall the snow depth only increased 23”!

<duck and run>

*Note I love when people comment on that stuff regarding northern snow.  “They get a foot of snow but only 5 inches of depth between the two days. Fake.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it’s snow on top of deep snow, that’s pretty normal. Happened down here in huge snow pack winters like 2011 and 2015. Though I’d nitpick and say it looks like depth got up to 61.5” so that’s a 25.5” increase in a 47” fall...that last 2.5” on 3/2 was probably putrid with the disc of the sun showing and a rotted out airmass...I remember it just circulating like a spring wheel-o-rhea with no cold left at all.

Its when you get like 24” of LES fluff on bare ground and it’s 8” a couple days later is when it’s “fake”...and then vaporizes in 2 days when the temps reach 40-45F. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Fozz said:

Wasn't that storm more of a bust for the mid-Atlantic? It was supposed to be a big one in DC/Baltimore, probably 8-12" or so, but then it bypassed us completely while NYC and Philly ended the millennium with a major storm.

I'm guessing up this way it may have tracked too close and become a rainer. It was a very compact storm.

Where I was in NJ by Rutgers I think we got around 7" from this storm. 

Snow .jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, FPizz said:

Where I was in NJ by Rutgers I think we got around 7" from this storm. 

Snow .jpg

I think that is a different storm there. We meant 12/30/00.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I think that is a different storm there. We meant 12/30/00.

Correct thanks, I had the wrong year.  12/30/00 locally had around 18-22" from that storm. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

If it’s snow on top of deep snow, that’s pretty normal. Happened down here in huge snow pack winters like 2011 and 2015. Though I’d nitpick and say it looks like depth got up to 61.5” so that’s a 25.5” increase in a 47” fall...that last 2.5” on 3/2 was probably putrid with the disc of the sun showing and a rotted out airmass...I remember it just circulating like a spring wheel-o-rhea with no cold left at all.

Its when you get like 24” of LES fluff on bare ground and it’s 8” a couple days later is when it’s “fake”...and then vaporizes in 2 days when the temps reach 40-45F. 

I’m just joking, those fake things always crack me up.  Still busted out some decent ratios on the second half of that for how wet the atmosphere was.

That was a crazy elevation storm... I think we only got 20” in Stowe Village whole the mountain got destroyed.  It was like a 1,500ft and up type event for the big 40”+ totals.  I remember the line was right near the base of the ski area here.  Mansfield depth went from 54” to 102” up at picnic table level.

Looking at Cocorahs, the next closest totals during that to Randolph were actually near Logan11... there are a couple sites next to ALB above 1,000ft with 52” and 58” of cumulative snowfall.  Even a 40” one in western Mass too, but I think snow levels were a tad lower (not much) back out west that way than they were even in NNE.

The Randolph high elevation sites stand out compared to the lower sites.  Inches of rain elsewhere.  That 4.57” with 8.5” snow ob to the south of Wildcat must’ve been flooding rain while 500ft above them got 4 feet.

That was a crazy storm once you hit the all-snow elevation... even back into central NY.

5D73C98D-C545-4F5D-B63A-BCA518B09F06.thumb.jpeg.9ca6858a779df913f40f335b8d760e3b.jpeg

33A02F80-8A8E-4659-88B6-0EA8A928B939.jpeg.7eedf3eb24d56ab2105261b05960f6af.jpeg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

I’m just joking, those fake things always crack me up.  Still busted out some decent ratios on the second half of that for how wet the atmosphere was.

That was a crazy elevation storm... I think we only got 20” in Stowe Village whole the mountain got destroyed.  It was like a 1,500ft and up type event for the big 40”+ totals.  I remember the line was right near the base of the ski area here.  Mansfield depth went from 54” to 102” up at picnic table level.

Looking at Cocorahs, the next closest totals during that to Randolph were actually near Logan11... there are a couple sites next to ALB above 1,000ft with 52” and 58” of cumulative snowfall.  Even a 40” one in western Mass too, but I think snow levels were a tad lower (not much) back out west that way than they were even in NNE.

The Randolph high elevation sites stand out.  Inches of rain elsewhere.  That 4.57” with 8.5” snow ob to the south of Wildcat must’ve been flooding rain while 500ft above them got 3-4 feet.

That was a crazy storm once you hit the all-snow elevation... even back into central NY.

 

 

Once you got south of Phin and Alex's area, a lot of the snow was from the first wave on 2/24. I actually had about a foot of paste from that on winter hill in ORH...then round 2 was like 3 inches of 37F rain, lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Once you got south of Phin and Alex's area, a lot of the snow was from the first wave on 2/24. I actually had about a foot of paste from that on winter hill in ORH...then round 2 was like 3 inches of 37F rain, lol.

Yup same in Stowe down at 750ft.  We got 20” (11.5” and then 8.5”) on the first wave and then rain after, whereas 1500ft and above kept piling up snow day after day.

The higher els looked like the Sierra, caked in rime and like 4 feet of elephants snot, probably what Alex and Phin’s yards looked like too lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ORH_wxman said:

You had 12/30/00 PTSD in the 1/12/11 thread....you got convinced you were screwed. Here's where it starts, but the real melt happens a couple pages later.

 

Lol, I totally remember this melt! I was panicking myself that the dry slot was going to get me. It did for a half hour, but still managed like 27".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ORH_wxman said:

Once you got south of Phin and Alex's area, a lot of the snow was from the first wave on 2/24. I actually had about a foot of paste from that on winter hill in ORH...then round 2 was like 3 inches of 37F rain, lol.

Elevation-related in our area too.  Farmington co-op recorded 8.8" at 420' while the Temple cocorahs observer, 6 miles west and 800' higher, had 26.4".  Heard rumors that 'Loaf summit had about 5 feet; those idiots who went thru the barriers thinking they would ski down the back side were up to their ears in damp powder, the woods too thick to ski.  IIRC, they got the bill for the rescue $$.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, powderfreak said:

Must be fake snow, look at 50” of snowfall the snow depth only increased 23”!

<duck and run>

*Note I love when people comment on that stuff regarding northern snow.  “They get a foot of snow but only 5 inches of depth between the two days. Fake.”

It's all about settling & compacting. We actually tend to get a lot of powder here, of course we get some fluff and some heavy wet snow too. Everyone talks about how quickly the lake effect fluff settles, and it's very true, but powder does the same thing. You can have 3" of powder on the ground that has more density than a fluff pack, so let's say the next day is cloudy and dry, you might lose hardly any of that depth. But let's say the next day has another 3" of powder, your depth may only finish that 2nd day at 4 to 5" rather than 6", it just now has more water content.  But if that was a wet 3" of snow on the ground, you can bet your depth would be 6". I'll go up to the snow belt of northern Michigan in February when they had months of 40:1 lake effect fluff compacted into one heavy slab of snow. The depth might be 3' with a 5 or 6" water content.   No matter how much snow is on the ground when it's powder on powder it always compacts.  That is why the 2' snowpack in 2014 was so impressive here. It was like walking in ice cold quicksand. I'm a big guy and got stuck in a chest high drift that I had a hard time getting out of when I decided to venture off.  The heavy water content of East Coast snows makes a huge difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, powderfreak said:

Yup same in Stowe down at 750ft.  We got 20” (11.5” and then 8.5”) on the first wave and then rain after, whereas 1500ft and above kept piling up snow day after day.

The higher els looked like the Sierra, caked in rime and like 4 feet of elephants snot, probably what Alex and Phin’s yards looked like too lol.

Woodford VT reported 62" during that 5 day stretch. Savoy Mass 57". Mitch would have been buried in his current spot if he was there, probably near 60" also I would guess. I wasn't here obviously yet, but I heard it was 16-22" with a lot of rain mixed in here in the low lands of SVT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Starting to see the 'continental folding' effect beginning to emerge more and more in guidance.  What I mean by that is a large, hemispheric -scale Kelvin-Hem. wave effect from huge velocities ripping the mid latitudes and folding over the ridge over western N/A.

In fact, this early cool pop over the next 36 to 48 hours is really part of that, and in my mind is integral in the same propensity ... increasingly more commonplace since ~ 2000 ... lending snow in Octobers and Novembers with increasing frequency. These are exaggerated shots across the bow ladies and girls -

I suspect this is contributing to why we are observing unusually large temperature gradients either side of the mean polar jet, as was in part recently demoed over the eastern front range of the Rockies, in part exaggerated/augmented by elevation/mountain upslope effects.  With +16 to even +20 C synoptic -scaled 850 mb thermal ridges ridging within 200 km of -2 to +3 C early season anomalies... Doing so at all is not hugely unusual; doing so relative to September climate is definitely not normal.  The Denver 90s to 30s in 24 hours in snow, to these present modeled cinemas of 20C ( GGEM ) over Michigan not three or four days after being -2 C, over that area... these are fantastic roll-out events.. 

But, I don't think it is just this season. I think these sort of occurrences are part of the morphology of the large circulation eddy associated with climate change.  Fast velocity has plagued even the summers - just not as readily observable ( more subtle ..). But all this is/has unusually registered/able R-wave coherency ... and that has been happening in summers since really the super Nino of 1998 ... however much or less notwithstanding. This coherency has lent to early season, western North America exaggerated +PNAP flow constructs, which in turn is why we have seen a frequency up tick in early cold intrusion events in Octobers and Novembers.  This is at the transition where just the hemisphere is cooling ... yet several weeks prior to when the deeper gradient saturation of winter settles/compresses the flow; which triggers the "real" pattern emergence for that winter.  But, I have noticed that we have had a lot of +PNAP high velocity pattern biases.  We dont' seem to really deviate much from that - remove the 2015 anomaly from the data set since 2010, most of these winters in a fairly "smoothed" objective sense have not really deviated their patterns too tremendously obvious.  It would all account for opportunity windows for strange cold incursions in the autumns, that would in fact roll out and swing wildly back mild ... due the expanded HC.   "Packing pellet" virga CU October cold snaps followed by 70s has happened too often since 20 spanning 20 years...some half the seasons.  

It's anecdotal to add the following, but ...in the previous 30 years of my life, if I saw a grapple pellet in October ( May for the matter) it was arresting. Now ... it's like when is it not.  That's enough to trigger acclimation and expectancy .. usually, that's climate impacting at a personal level when that more human response to change can be noted.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So based on all that ... 

If one were to forecast normal temperatures for October and November, ...obscuring and hiding the fact that there were a couple of cold and snow anomalies ... just because interceding air masses were dry and hot, ... Wouldn't shock me.  Yup...totally "normal" October and November - just look at the 2 month totals/N-terms - nothing to see here. Nothing out of the ordinary... Hiding climate change :axe:    ...Then, followed by a velocity stolen winter that claws and scrapes to snow averages in between ice events that fall short of warning by virtue of the fact that they can't hang around longer than 6 hours before their structures are smeared and sheared and blown open halfway to England ...Then, we even exceed "seasonal" totals because of May blue bomb on Memorial day in an apr/may combo that is -6 from norms due to the same folding afflicting springs - 

Obviously there's some sarcasm to this ..but...  early and late cool snaps with snow out of calendar climo with an iffy mid winter gradient problem .... too repeating across both NINO/NINA/NADA ... and varying solar cycles... for me to assume these latter as primary in seasonal outlook philosophy.  The empirical results can be explained by early hypothesis/relationship to changes that are already being actually measured and papered re climate change ...  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read this thread hoping to see someone post actual weather related content regarding a forecast for this upcoming season.

 

And then Tip posts and I go back to realizing I'm better off reading about winters past...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, 8611Blizz said:

I read this thread hoping to see someone post actual weather related content regarding a forecast for this upcoming season.

 

And then Tip posts and I go back to realizing I'm better off reading about winters past...

Lol - 

nah don't fret ...  2015's can still happen - just not so predictable... I mean that whole ordeal back during that fateful February was actually even intraseasonal in temporal scale .. The whole season wasn't really terribly below normal in temperature... And as far as snow, I remember remarking in snark back then that for a lot of cases, if it did not snow a single flake for three consecutive years immediately going forward ( which wasn't the case, just sayn' ), than those locales would in fact only be normal snow for the 5 year climate sojourn - 

Anyway, ... I'm just saying in would not surprise me to see similar playout...  some odd cold snaps early and late, with plausible snow chances ...with an extended period or something related to gradient/velocity surpluses doing weird things in DJF proper .. It would be keeping with both trend over recent years/decades, as well as actually fit other empirical based reasons - 

But we'll see...  It's going to get colder as the daylight gets dimmer - 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MJO812 said:

Why does the NAO have to go negative right now ? SMH.

C7122E91-C383-4493-BD42-C67ECA463ABB.thumb.gif.1847a7c80df20aee7399c68f579b75d1.gif

I'm not too worried. It's already going right back up. As long as the Nao goes negative December through March at least a few times we're set

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.