Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,029
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

October Comes Early: Late September Multi-Hazard Hybrid Storm


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kdxken said:

Winds have been unimpressive here. Best I could manage in 2 days is a 24 mph gust. Wasn't expecting much but more than that.

We'll see what tonight brings, but doubt "forests leveled" gonna happen.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JACKASS said:

We'll see what tonight brings, but doubt "forests leveled" gonna happen.

Yeah there's like 11,000 customers without power in Massachusetts. Not a shockingly high number. In February we had 300,000 in March 65,000.  With full leaf out it's unimpressive.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Because the winds are not accurate. It’s on my deck at ground level surrounded by woods. 
 

Why don’t you ever post models ?

I don’t want to step in the middle of this, but why would the temperature be accurate but the winds not?

Like that’s likely the wind speed in your yard just like the temperature, no?

  • Haha 1
  • yes 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

I don’t want to step in the middle of this, but why would the temperature be accurate but the winds not?

Like that’s likely the wind speed in your yard just like the temperature, no?

The pretzel logic response will be good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

I don’t want to step in the middle of this, but why would the temperature be accurate but the winds not?

Like that’s likely the wind speed in your yard just like the temperature, no?

I cannot believe you’re even asking me that question. I thought you knew weather and weather stations . Are you serious?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

I cannot believe you’re even asking me that question. I thought you knew weather and weather stations . Are you serious?


I 100% understand what you are saying, you are trying to estimate the wind above treetop height, right?

To me it’s like saying your temperature is 35F on a night the station says 45F… but saying “well if the trees weren’t there and it was open to the sky above, I’d have radiated more.”

Do you live 100 feet up above the canopy?  I feel like that caveat is important to mention.  

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, powderfreak said:


I 100% understand what you are saying, you are trying to estimate the wind above treetop height, right?

To me it’s like saying your temperature is 35F on a night the station says 45F… but saying “well if the trees weren’t there and it was open to the sky above, I’d have radiated more.”

Do you live 100 feet up above the canopy?

 

Or to simplify, if my aunt had testicles she'd be my uncle.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, powderfreak said:


I 100% understand what you are saying, you are trying to estimate the wind above treetop height, right?

To me it’s like saying your temperature is 35F on a night the station says 45F… but saying “well if the trees weren’t there and it was open to the sky above, I’d have radiated more.”

Do you live 100 feet up above the canopy?  I feel like that caveat is important to mention.  

I mean there’s almost no one here that has a home wx station that uses their anemometers for winds . They all know they aren’t correct . Unless it’s mounted up on a roof on hilltop like Gene 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

I mean there’s almost no one here that has a home wx station that uses their anemometers for winds . They all know they aren’t correct . Unless it’s mounted up on a roof on hilltop like Gene 

I guess that’s where I got caught up.  They are correct for sampling 2-meter wind speed.   They are just boring; like that’s the speed the wind is 6 feet above your yard. Same with temperature. We don’t like that and want to sample the free air above treetop exposed wind because it’s more sexy.

The one part of it I can square is that the force that would cause tree damage is the wind at canopy top level.  Like knowing what wind speed at that 80-100 foot level above ground starts tree damage would be important.

It’s sort of like tarmac temps/winds vs wooded area temps/winds.  Pros and cons to both sitings.

The weenie set up is temp close to ground and wind 100 feet overhead.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

I guess that’s where I got caught up.  They are correct for sampling 2-meter wind speed.   They are just boring; like that’s the speed the wind is 6 feet above your yard. Same with temperature. We don’t like that and want to sample the free air above treetop exposed wind because it’s more sexy.

The one part of it I can square is that the force that would cause tree damage is the wind at canopy top level.  Like knowing what wind speed at that 80-100 foot level above ground starts tree damage would be important.

It’s sort of like tarmac temps/winds vs wooded area temps/winds.  Pros and cons to both sitings.

The weenie set up is temp close to ground and wind 100 feet overhead.  

That's actually a very good point. And folks thought you were just a ski bum.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...