Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,531
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow 1/25 - 1/26


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

The CMC would be the best storm for most in many many years. It has literally all the ingredients that we love: cold temperatures, all-snow, long duration, includes part of weekend, high QPF. Anyone saying it's not a big storm is crazy. It might not drop record snow anywhere/everywhere, but in a few spots that could rival the big ones even as depicted.

giphy.gif


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJO812 said:

We get over a foot.

That would be great if this were a 36 hour forecast. I'm just sensitive to any negative trends because this could disappear quickly if any piece doesn't align. The AIs and ensembles still aren't fully on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The positive spin is the ECM and ECM-AI are clearly worse aloft at 12z than the previous 2 runs. The phase is "less clean"... and yet they both still produce a major snowstorm. That's encouraging. It suggests outcome resiliency and a buffer against negative trends.

The negative spin is that the ECM and ECM-AI were clearly worse aloft at 12z in a direction that, if it continued to trend, would lead to a GFS-like solution.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Joe4alb said:

When GFS shows something great - "It's horrible, it won't happen" and it doesn't

When GFS shows something bad - "It's horrible, it won't happen" and it does

that's not true, the GfS showed a storm last week and everyone discounted it ended up being half right but everyone said it wasn't worth looking at but gfs is a good model but i think its wrong here because you literally have the cmc uk and euro depicting a SECs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t be shocked if the end result of this storm is about an 8 hour event that brings 4-8” of snow. Those saying the changes aloft on the Euro are just noise are being ignorant. A long duration event only happens if there’s a clean phase. Otherwise it’s overrunning and a scrape as the coastal gets kicked East.

  • Like 2
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

Don’t be shocked if the end result of this storm is about an 8 hour event that brings 4-8” of snow. Those saying the changes aloft on the Euro are just noise are being ignorant. A long duration event only happens if there’s a clean phase. Otherwise it’s overrunning and a scrape as the coastal gets kicked East.

Its pretty safe to say this event up this way will not be as insanely long duration in all likelihood as it may be down in the SE because they may see a crazy long overrunning period.  I felt the 12Z Op Euro was gonna go full blown UKMET when I saw it through like 96 hours but it ultimately deviated after that.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

We get over a foot.

I think it's a great run and I agree ratios will be higher than 10:1 but as someone else mentioned earlier, there's more than just temps needed to ensure high ratios. I highly caution people not to ever assume more than 12:1. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

Don’t be shocked if the end result of this storm is about an 8 hour event that brings 4-8” of snow. Those saying the changes aloft on the Euro are just noise are being ignorant. A long duration event only happens if there’s a clean phase. Otherwise it’s overrunning and a scrape as the coastal gets kicked East.

Take that and run and onto Feb. Especially after last fee winters

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

Don’t be shocked if the end result of this storm is about an 8 hour event that brings 4-8” of snow. Those saying the changes aloft on the Euro are just noise are being ignorant. A long duration event only happens if there’s a clean phase. Otherwise it’s overrunning and a scrape as the coastal gets kicked East.

No model shows that right now. We still have alot of time so we shall see.

Yes the gfs does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a great run and I agree ratios will be higher than 10:1 but as someone else mentioned earlier, there's more than just temps needed to ensure high ratios. I highly caution people not to ever assume more than 12:1. 

It's REALLY cold.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said:

Yeah usually the high caliber model predictions don't happen. GFS was a borderine SECS for Sunday, but we busted low with 1-3" for most on here. 

I might be wrong, but you strike me as someone who would complain about winning the lottery because of all the taxes you would have to pay on the winnings. 

  • Haha 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12:1 is a good first guess for ratios IMO. Interior, mountainous regions get great ratios because they get great lift combined with cold. High ratio snow along the coastal plain is usually confined to snow squalls and heavy banding. Long-duration light-moderate snow might not coincide with enough lift in the snowgrowth zone to get higher ratios. Locking in 15:1 could lead to disappointment. 

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

I wouldn't say its noise. There's like 20 runs to go before start time so even subtle changes can add up over time

Yep, about 20 model cycles to go.  I would start to look for some sort of consistency and trends starting with the 12Z runs tomorrow to get an idea of where we stand.  At that point (12Z tomorrow) we'll be within about 96 hours of the event.  The better models (CMC/EURO/EURO AI) should start to have a better handle on things.  Expect the GFS to flop around for who knows how long. I give no credence to that model no matter what it shows.  It is bottom of the barrel.

We might even want to start the baseline at 00Z tonight and see how things move from there.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eduggs said:

12:1 is a good first guess for ratios IMO. Interior, mountainous regions get great ratios because they get great lift combined with cold. High ratio snow along the coastal plain is usually confined to snow squalls and heavy banding. Long-duration light-moderate snow might not coincide with enough lift in the snowgrowth zone to get higher ratios. Locking in 15:1 could lead to disappointment. 

FYI  a few of the more reliable METS are even mentioning 20:1 around the metro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...