Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

The last hurrah? Putting all the eggs in the Tuesday 3/14 basket


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Lol. Your points are valid but 3k disagreeing with its cousin gives even more pause. Outside of the hills, we waste too much on liquid from the awful invt look. Mid level dynamics look to go to town too late, story of my KU life, for those along and SE of 84. 
 

I pray I am wrong.

We're certainly fighting time, no doubt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

It was obvious early on that it was going to get its act together a bit earlier....which is what helps with all the conveyors maturing quicker and giving a monster CCB to a lot of SNE.

Was just talking to John ... we both agree the lacking/amorphously defined b-c axis likely causing the models like to Euro to " go out a find" anything it can to place a low.  Usually some supercell out there in the ocean...etc.  

Not sure if that makes the NAM more believable, but it certainly a reasonable consideration.. the 32 km has a better deep layer integration ( I think this is true ) than the 3km, because it considers a larger volume of total domain space... When coupling that concept with a superior overall meshing, it may make this circumstance 'in its wheelhouse' so to speak.

This is also what/why Dec 2009 was handled so well by the this model's ancestor version - it detected that b-c wall with pin point precision because it was like 20C across 10 lateral miles along a line between NJ and ACK that faithful day.  Gee, where's the low going to rail along, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

I mean wayyyy different in the LP location.

image.thumb.png.6309b059d042fdcd877c8cd55d15728e.png

I'm just wondering why are these models so all over the place? And just this one model, what is the difference of the 3k over the 12k? Is one more trusting than the other. Of course the 12k would be the one of choice lol. I've never seen models this bad this close to a storm.

The second thing is the storm off North Carolina forming. It really has a nice circuit. A little eye already. Is that a sign that the storm is going to consolidate more as it moves up? It's there. It's happening right now, is that a game changer?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3K would work in ern areas. 

So If I were in metro BOS I want two things. 

1) Ideally a consolidated low like the 12z NAM yesterday parked near the elbow or even in CC Bay. That works.

2) If we dong, get the low to pivot into just east of BOS like last nights runs did. 

I honestly can see arguments for any solution, even ones pivoting into metro west. You are trying to time the mating of the nrn and srn stream abd where that occurs will dictate both the inv trough and also where the low pivots. 

 

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

Was just talking to John ... we both agree the lacking/amorphously defined b-c axis likely causing the models like to Euro to " go out a find" anything it can to place a low.  Usually some supercell out there in the ocean...etc.  

Not sure if that makes the NAM more believable, but it certainly a reasonable consideration.. the 32 km has a better deep layer integration ( I think this is true ) than the 3km, because it considers a larger volume of total domain space... When coupling the concept with a superior overall meshing, it may make this circumstance 'in its wheelhouse' so to speak.

This is also what Dec 2009 was handled so well by the this models' ancestry - it hit that b-c wall with pin point precision because it was like 20C across 10 miles betwee NJ and ACK that faithful day.  Gee, where's the low going to rail along, right?

Bingo...I posted something similar last night (or maybe it was earlier this morning, who knows anymore). But it seemed like there was one supercell the HRRR/Euro were latching on to and going wonkers with the associated vorticity. It's not like there is expected to be a tremendous amount of convection...enough anyways to make me believe that this will becoming dominant with an east tug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

06z EURO pins that fire those right over me, as opposed to just south...in December, that porks me....not in March, as long as mid levels hold, which they do and dynamics will be off charts.

Boundary layer still looks pretty marginal up your way on the Euro. A bit of elevation would definitely help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

I mean the precip shield is way back to the NYK boarder despite the surface low location. Upper low doing this?

image.thumb.png.cffc0fa4c42d53d28f17841215b9bfe8.png

Yeah...I posted in the NYC forum how on 2/8/13 we were snowing heavy here with a surface low over Cape Cod at 06z.  you can get a mass expansion of the snow shield in the window when there is a close off and full phase 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

Biggest question I have is how far east along that corridor does it stay substantial... Leominster?  Harvard?

Yeah I'm not far from right where RT 2 hits 1000', so I'm typically right on edge of the good stuff. My folks are a couple miles west with another 150'+ or so of elevation.  Makes a difference. In my experience the change over typically happens at the drug rehab place on RT 2. 

12" is not that crazy, but 24"+ is wild, especially if it's glop.  That's for the berks though.  We good for keeping power. 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...