Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,604
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

“Cory’s in NYC! Let’s HECS!” Feb. 22-24 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

6 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Is the great support in the room with us?

It’s a coin flip, at best. Some major players showing not much, and 18z moved decidedly in that direction 

1. Which Major Players are NOT showing it?

2. How many times has the GFS or Euro shown a Major Storm almost exactly the same way for 8 tim’s in a row?  

 

I can’t Believe the negativity on this thing.  

The only fun here is Kevin and I are on the same page for Once.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSnowman said:

1. Which Major Players are NOT showing it?

2. How many times has the GFS or Euro shown a Major Storm almost exactly the same way for 8 tim’s in a row?  

 

I can’t Believe the negativity on this thing.  

The only fun here is Kevin and I are on the same page for Once.  

It’s rare for sure. Can you squeeze out a love song for us? Faithfully by Journey maybe ?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
  • no 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dendrite said:

As long as the machines look like this at H5 we’re in the game

image.png

One reason why the ECMWF may be off on its own, it may not being handling (or handling better?) the Wed and Fri events.  A lot IMHO hinges on how those impact things upstream and downstream.  This is not a your typical calm pre-storm environment.  It's a bit "crowded" aloft as to s/w.  Subtle differences can magnify greatly as to details in 4-5 days.
 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheSnowman said:

1. Which Major Players are NOT showing it? Euro

2. How many times has the GFS or Euro shown a Major Storm almost exactly the same way for 8 tim’s in a row?  Stupid question, has no relevance at d6

 

I can’t Believe the negativity on this thing.  Deal

The only fun here is Kevin and I are on the same page for Once.  Hotel reservation incoming?

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

You’ve accomplished your goal . You’ve dragged Dryslot and Runaway and other good posters into your negative , everything sucks mentality 

lol what. Again, I’m calling it like I see it. You can choose to ignore the euro suite, I’m not. It’s a factor, sorry 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-tale-of-three-disturbances.html

What is evident on Friday night is disturbance #3 entering the fray may by moving into the north plains.  The crucial difference here is that shortly after the system descends south of the Canadien border, ridging begins to build over the western COUNS intramountain region.
 
AVvXsEiKbovyMOx_su1EqwwUaQ2iEvzFkaXqdPzQ

This allows ample room for amplification under the aforementioned PV-block dyad due to the fact that southeast heights decrease as a result of the building western CONUS ridge.
 
AVvXsEivTYyG-SFEEGXFlhL53JDXZA46wPbKKlkH
 
Note the decreased amplitude and further east position of the ridge in guidance from Sunday.
 
AVvXsEg1zKGtLEROgAdnZz3oV0S8p5rcHR_QjHHG

While this does in fact represent a more favorable ridge placement and intensity for major east coast storms, the fact that it remains marginal in conjunction with increased confluence to the north still implies that a major storm is dubious.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-tale-of-three-disturbances.html

 

What is evident on Friday night is disturbance #3 entering the fray may by moving into the north plains.  The crucial difference here is that shortly after the system descends south of the Canadien border, ridging begins to build over the western COUNS intramountain region.
 
AVvXsEiKbovyMOx_su1EqwwUaQ2iEvzFkaXqdPzQ

This allows ample room for amplification under the aforementioned PV-block dyad due to the fact that southeast heights decrease as a result of the building western CONUS ridge.
 
AVvXsEivTYyG-SFEEGXFlhL53JDXZA46wPbKKlkH
 
Note the decreased amplitude and further east position of the ridge in guidance from Sunday.
 
AVvXsEg1zKGtLEROgAdnZz3oV0S8p5rcHR_QjHHG

While this does in fact represent a more favorable ridge placement and intensity for major east coast storms, the fact that it remains marginal in conjunction with increased confluence to the north still implies that a major storm is dubious.

You couldn't resist could you.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-tale-of-three-disturbances.html

 

What is evident on Friday night is disturbance #3 entering the fray may by moving into the north plains.  The crucial difference here is that shortly after the system descends south of the Canadien border, ridging begins to build over the western COUNS intramountain region.
 
AVvXsEiKbovyMOx_su1EqwwUaQ2iEvzFkaXqdPzQ

This allows ample room for amplification under the aforementioned PV-block dyad due to the fact that southeast heights decrease as a result of the building western CONUS ridge.
 
AVvXsEivTYyG-SFEEGXFlhL53JDXZA46wPbKKlkH
 
Note the decreased amplitude and further east position of the ridge in guidance from Sunday.
 
AVvXsEg1zKGtLEROgAdnZz3oV0S8p5rcHR_QjHHG

While this does in fact represent a more favorable ridge placement and intensity for major east coast storms, the fact that it remains marginal in conjunction with increased confluence to the north still implies that a major storm is dubious.

That final panel is like 2/1989 exactly.  I always say if you see that you better have a very strong -NAO.  12/26/10 was close to that too but not same orientation.  The ridge was taller

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I didn't say it was gone, Its still days away but today's trends have been less favorable, You still need to weigh the euro even if its been off, Still plenty of time left on this, Need to get past tomorrow and see where Saturday ends up first, Otherwise we follow the trends.

I don't think we were ever in the game with this one anyway.  Mattapoisett might have a fun time with it though.

I think we'll score a couple  Friday night though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, moneypitmike said:

I don't think we were ever in the game with this one anyway.  Mattapoisett might have a fun time with it though.

I think we'll score a couple  Friday night though.

I disagree, You don't write off day 6 threats, But i already stated we need to see where these next 2 end up, Sure we can see a couple friday night saturday, But i want to see that one further north then modeled right now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro could be right but I’m still hedging toward more amplified for reasons I posted earlier in this thread. It also has not been good at all this season when on an island. 
 

I do think it’s telling though that the “glue factory” posts about the euro are not very plentiful at the moment. Tells me most people don’t believe that rhetoric. 
 

Kevin and Accordions not withstanding. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-tale-of-three-disturbances.html

 

What is evident on Friday night is disturbance #3 entering the fray may by moving into the north plains.  The crucial difference here is that shortly after the system descends south of the Canadien border, ridging begins to build over the western COUNS intramountain region.
 
AVvXsEiKbovyMOx_su1EqwwUaQ2iEvzFkaXqdPzQ

This allows ample room for amplification under the aforementioned PV-block dyad due to the fact that southeast heights decrease as a result of the building western CONUS ridge.
 
AVvXsEivTYyG-SFEEGXFlhL53JDXZA46wPbKKlkH
 
Note the decreased amplitude and further east position of the ridge in guidance from Sunday.
 
AVvXsEg1zKGtLEROgAdnZz3oV0S8p5rcHR_QjHHG

While this does in fact represent a more favorable ridge placement and intensity for major east coast storms, the fact that it remains marginal in conjunction with increased confluence to the north still implies that a major storm is dubious.

Great analysis, and I learn a new vocab work..."DYAD!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...