Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

January 6-7 Storm Discussion: we’re due?


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, 87storms said:

lol, I wonder how much sleet is really gonna be at play with this one.  Seems like mostly a rain or snow situation, but I could be wrong.

 

You're right, but even rain/snow line shows up on CC

Checking GFS soundings for MBY, and I'm 31-32 the entire time. Going to be a mix of rain, snow, rain/snow even for me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think I’ll not put any eggs in the GEM basket. Waiting for the euro but there’s still room for this to be big IMO. All I look at is the 500 map at about Fri morning. That’s gonna tell the tale. There’s room for improvement there and the gfs did so ever so slightly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Newman said:

Ukmet definitely cut back for max totals west of 95, QPF a bit less. General 6-10" swath. DC would be marginal

850s are sooooo close, but surface temps are shot. That said, UKIE thermals are lol. Cville is placed into an isolated freezer with the 6" of snow it gets this run

sfct-imp.us_ma.png

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

I will take this as gospel with our 340' elevation.  More seriously and on topic, agree that past experience suggests a significant NW/SE FFX county gradient in NoVA.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

Media Delaware County Southeastern PA is 310' how will we do?  I am thinking 2-4" / 3-5" before we flip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Newman said:

Ukmet definitely cut back for max totals west of 95, QPF a bit less. General 6-10" swath. DC would be marginal

Looks qualitatively consistent with gfs and GGEM with a solid thump and then mixing dependent on location. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

That was the storm that turned my elevation into a meme. Nearly 6” IMBY while the other side of town at 250’ had 2.5” of slop. And I was very annoying about it.

I think it’s up in their air where that line will be this time. It could just as easily have a 2/3/2014 or Oct 2011 gradient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

NW of 95, but literally at 299 feet. Fortunately, I live about halfway down the hill, so it's a short walk to 300. :raining:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

In that storm I went from my parents house in Potomac where we had a plowable snow to Comet Ping Pong in NW where it wasn't much more than a cartopper. 2-17-18 was another one w a sharp gradient from downtown to western suburbs as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we see models consolidate and come to consensus by 12z Thursday, January 4th.

 

Thinking 1-3" DC to Baltimore ..... 2-4" PHL as someone said over 350 feet 3-6" beyond the fall line north and west 6-8" 

 

Typical 95 north and west deal... south and east of 95 good luck 1" or less. As I see it right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, StormyClearweather said:

NW of 95, but literally at 299 feet. Fortunately, I live about halfway down the hill, so it's a short walk to 300. :raining:

I'm at 325 ft and the creek below me is probably 300' on the dot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

Snow maps are going to struggle on the boundary.  Soundings and QPF are the way to go.  I’m modestly happy with this run sitting on the western DC Beltway.

Do you (or anyone else who knows) mind explaining how someone would be able to read the soundings to determine if it looks more white than wet, or the basics at least?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Do you (or anyone else who knows) mind explaining how someone would be able to read the soundings to determine if it looks more white than wet, or the basics at least?  

https://thecloudonline.net/blog/basic-skew-t-analysis-snow-or-no-snow/

 

there are dozens of sites out there, depending on how in-depth you want to go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kmlwx said:

For those of you that want to nailbite even more about elevation - this is the Maryland LiDAR viewer

https://geodata.md.gov/topoviewer/

Cool tool if nothing else - REALLY high-res data there. I think @mappy might have been the one to post it a long while ago. For map geeks, can get lost for hours in just scrolling around. 

That is awesome.  This is a pretty good took that has the whole country if you want to waste a lot of time.  

https://en-us.topographic-map.com/map-hqf3/Baltimore/?center=39.43478%2C-77.33712&zoom=9

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Do you (or anyone else who knows) mind explaining how someone would be able to read the soundings to determine if it looks more white than wet, or the basics at least?  

The sounding just has to be entirely left of the 0C line to be snow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MN Transplant said:

Does that account for a close mow?

It is wild that this turned into a Saturday only event.

Yeah it really sped up. Even if some of the bigger totals that have been shown came to pass, not good timing for snow day hopefuls on Monday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you (or anyone else who knows) mind explaining how someone would be able to read the soundings to determine if it looks more white than wet, or the basics at least?  

Just keep in mind that each isotherm line has a positive slope because air generally cools with height. It’s a little counter intuitive at first. You also don’t want the parcel at the mid level heights to poke through the 0C line (ie, where melting occurs) for too long.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

50 minutes ago, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

There was a SHARP cutoff with a storm Dec 5 2003.  There was a WAA wave that came out first and thumped NW of 95, the costal developed a day later and mostly missed us and hit New England.  But the WAA lead wave had some local similarities to this.  I remember I got 7" in western Fairfax county and inside the beltway was pretty much all rain.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, H2O said:

If you are 300'+ and NW of 95 you will do ok.  This storm screams 12/5/2009 and for those who remember that one it was a brutal, just brutal gradient from east to west.  

For my location just S of DC barely sniffing 200', for the last 5-10 years any storm that has temp issues like this one has erred too cold and its stayed warmer than modeled.  UHI, microclimate, whatever.  Just won't bode well for storms like this.  

Will be lucky to get 1" unless there is a shift in storm track to the SE.  

320 feet in Takoma Park but I don't think it will help on this one unless as you noted we get a more southeast track.  Anything marginal in the last 5+ years has been rain for us if I am remembering correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

 

There was a SHARP cutoff with a storm Dec 5 2003.  There was a WAA wave that came out first and thumped NW of 95, the costal developed a day later and mostly missed us and hit New England.  But the WAA lead wave had some local similarities to this.  I remember I got 7" in western Fairfax county and inside the beltway was pretty much all rain.  

That was a really nice storm for the suburbs especially for so early in the season. I got a storm total of 12 in Reisterstown. 7 with the initial wave and about 5 from the coastal. I'm pretty sure areas just west of the beltway from Randallstown over to Ellicott City did the best with the first round with some 8-10 inch amounts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

 

There was a SHARP cutoff with a storm Dec 5 2003.  There was a WAA wave that came out first and thumped NW of 95, the costal developed a day later and mostly missed us and hit New England.  But the WAA lead wave had some local similarities to this.  I remember I got 7" in western Fairfax county and inside the beltway was pretty much all rain.  

I was living in Woodbridge at the time and recall seeing on the news that Leesburg was getting hammered with snow while it was pouring rain at my house. On that day Leesburg 04 was born

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...