40/70 Benchmark Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, HoarfrostHubb said: Every 6 hours a totally different look... I would not be shook if it went from 30” to 3” for my hood I would be shocked if it went back to a non event....I think over night guidance will be immense and the magnitude of this event will begin to come into focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 It’s too bad the SREFs suck. I’m relying on a SREFs/GFS rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, ineedsnow said: https://www.weather.gov/btv/4kmwrf Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said: Yes It's not showing for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I don't see a sharp cutoff North at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 9 minutes ago, powderfreak said: But I agree with him that those are the "most likely" spots and also from a purely climo standpoint it makes sense. The mix of possible QPF and slightly colder thermal profiles. It's just a first stab and hard to argue with "most likely." His area at lower coastal elevation isn’t likely to see more snow than say NW CT imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 26 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Have you noticed every one of your posts for the last month has included your itinerary LOL--my new job has me traveling a lot. And, I've gone 3 of 4 with weather-related flight cancelations the last month or so. 20 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Needs to be brought into NE and NW CT . Possibly NW RI. I'm shocked that you would say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 18 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said: I can't imagine the valley gets crucified like that but certainly possible with the right combination of down slopping, marginal temps. It did in 92 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 minute ago, STILL N OF PIKE said: Yes Thank you... But its the actual map that won't pop up i already got the link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I like the weenie battles from interior NE MA and NE CT hills at 1K. It's cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Going to be a different outcome on this run. Definite changes in the southwest energy. Looks like less interaction with the northern energy early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I dont have a good vision about this one yet. I’ll have to sleep on it and let it come to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, dendrite said: It’s too bad the SREFs suck. I’m relying on a SREFs/GFS rule. The KMA/JMA turn this **** upside down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, sbos_wx said: Going to be a different outcome on this run. Definite changes in the southwest energy. Looks like less interaction with the northern energy early. N energy a little stronger too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southshorewx Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 36 minutes ago, ncforecaster89 said: Do you or anyone else know if they repaired the compromised seawall at Scituate from January. Definitely leaning towards being there for Friday's high tide. Yes they did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: The KMA/JMA turn this **** upside down. Actually the jma was lame Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 4 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: The KMA/JMA turn this **** upside down. Literally. I used to save those old KMA maps and then rotate them 180° in MS Paint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 NAM has been too fast, listen people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Its not showing for some reason. I put it In his quote Its basically a snow storm from 3am fri am to Well after the model ends. Does try to wrap milder air into essex County and se nh as friday evening winds on as the e wind outlasts the drain 3-4" qpf and still going Tad more se areas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Southern is dragging its heels more than 18z run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Yeah... it’s already different through 24... probably won’t be as good as 18z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Geezus nam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Slower this run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Decent changes early on through 30... weaker in the Midwest from 18z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Can’t believe I and many are refreshing nam vigorously. Different solution incoming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 The interaction is delayed as I suspected. Remains to be seen whether or not this is delayed but not denied, or a bad run. Generally more early interaction has been better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 A couple of nuisance rain showers for Iowa. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, sbos_wx said: The interaction is delayed as I suspected. Remains to be seen whether or not this is delayed but not denied, or a bad run. Generally more early interaction has been better My initial reaction is that the earlier the better as it can gain some latitude out in the Midwest before getting pushed ESE as it hits the block over New England. But if it still bombs under Long Island it won't matter for SNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 43 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Have you noticed every one of your posts for the last month has included your itinerary His new name shall be Ricky Nelson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Whole thing is just weaker and more disjointed so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.