Winter Storm Threat Feb 22-24th

[MJO812]

[nycsnow]

[nycsnow]

AI eps

[Nibor]

17 minutes ago, RU848789 said:

Bad call.  Major improvement vs. 12Z, both in surface low being over 100 miles NW and actually getting 1-3" along 95 and 3-4" towards the NJ coast, vs nada at 12Z.  Looks similar to 6Z which people were gushing over.  

 

I said it came west and improved at 500 mb? Sorry I should have said grazer and posted a snow map. 

[SACRUS]

 

Creeping back up

 

[nycsnow]

[ron1660]

Kong is King.

[WeatherGeek2025]

2 hours ago, Jt17 said:

Weathergeek - how do we feel about euro AI your favorite looking terrible still, while every other model improved? Wondering how you are handling this emotionally.


.

i don't like it i don't know what to do now! guess we wait

[Jt17]

i don't like it i don't know what to do now! guess we wait

Deep breaths


.

[Irish]

20 minutes ago, ron1660 said:

Kong is King.

Umm... sure 

[EastonSN+]

First up NAM end of run.

[Mail Man]

2 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

First up NAM end of run.

It's the long range nam doesn't mean anything yet.

[SACRUS]

2 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

First up NAM end of run.

Compares to the GFS at the same range its much flatter or slower.

[EastonSN+]

1 minute ago, Mail Man said:

It's the long range nam doesn't mean anything yet.

Yup just one of the models 

[Mail Man]

I don't think the Icon wants to play ball yet.

[SACRUS]

 

2/19 00z ICON

 

 

 

[MJO812]

3 minutes ago, Mail Man said:

I don't think the Icon wants to play ball yet.

Less confluence but the trough wasn't sharp enough.

[SACRUS]

 

2/18 00z ICON

Total QPF 

 

[Mail Man]

I think RGEM had a better look maybe it could of done something.

[SACRUS]

 

RGEM did look much better tgan the NAM / ICOn and more in line with the 18z GFS