Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Possible Record Breaking Cold + Snow Sunday 1/25 - Tuesday 1/27


TriPol
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jm1220 said:

The 700 and 850 lows track over Lake Erie. Guaranteed we will mix with that and we have to hope the precip is largely over by then. 

It will be. We are still going to see a big snowfall.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WeatherGeek2025 said:

i'd go with hrrr once in range. Nam sucks

Agreed Nam is trash beyond 48hrs 

Just now, Krs4Lfe said:

The path of least resistance is clear here. I believe this will trend north and warmer with more sleet leading up to the day of the event. The GFS is wrong. This is a big SWFE. We will all mix and lots of it 

Ok bye 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


00z Total QPF / Snow / Sleet
NYC

SREF:  1.3 /  (8.4)
NAM: 1.3 / (8.4)
RGEM: 1.4 / (8.6)
ICON: 1.3 / (7.5)
GFS AI AIGFS: 1.1 / ( 10)
GFS: 1.4 / (14.8)
GGEM: 1.5 / (8.2)
UKMET: 0.9 - 11 / (6 - 10)
GEFS: 1.4 / (14)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

The 700 and 850 lows track over Lake Erie. Guaranteed we will mix with that and we have to hope the precip is largely over by then. 

If that is indeed the track they take, I need to see rest of 00Z guidance before I lean that way,  then 100% we're going over to sleet for a large part of this sub forum. You can't avoid mid level warming with 700/850 lows to Lake Erie.  This is where we were at at 9:00 this morning.  The 12Z guidance and 18Z guidance for the most part backed away from that, except for the CMC stuff.  Let's see what the rest of the 00Z guidance has to say.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MANDA said:

If that is indeed the track they take, I need to see rest of 00Z guidance before I lean that way,  then 100% we're going over to sleet for most of this forum.  This is where we were at at 9:00 this morning.  The 12Z guidance and 18Z guidance for the most part backed away from that, except for the CMC stuff.  Let's see what the rest of the 00Z guidance has to say.

It's the NAM of course but to avoid sleet we need those lows tracking well south of there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the GFS holds tonight, I won't worry about the NAM until this time tomorrow.  Tomer on Twitter thinks its in the process of folding. But if it doesn't fold tonight, and instead decides to fold tomorrow, etc, or never does,  it will be a pretty glaring and major error for the model and raise real questions about its relevancy going forward. 

https://x.com/burgwx/status/2014470490593886472?s=20

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Astoriaweather said:

If the GFS holds tonight, I won't worry about the NAM until this time tomorrow.  Tomer on Twitter thinks its in the process of folding. But if it doesn't fold tonight, and instead decides to fold tomorrow, etc, it will be a pretty glaring and major error for the model and raise real questions about its relevancy going forward. 

https://x.com/burgwx/status/2014470490593886472?s=20

I feel like we've been saying this for a decade

  • 100% 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WeatherGeek2025 said:

cause it's counting the sleet as snow

Well it has it’s own sleet output parameter so not sure. I a

 

8 minutes ago, Prue11 said:

Even more shocking. Wtf are they blending besides cocktails?  I am just trying to learn. And it’s not just a sleet issue because they have a FRAM output. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...