Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,460
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, stormy said:

I appreciate your suggestion, but No, I won't ignore them.

I fully understand that they are supposed to be more accurate than the deterministic models because of more data input across various parameters.  A higher skill score should be achieved, especially for complex systems or longer term considerations.

I will develop a comparison chart for ECM/EPS and GFS and GFS ens.

Saturdays rain will be a good first comparison.

Like I said, you don't understand. Google/AI might be helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been busy the last few days so haven't been paying much attention(a good thing actually)

Just looking at the ens means, and this is a pretty sweet UL look. We haven't seen energy digging like this very often lately. Still not crazy about the look in eastern Canada, with the vort lobe and higher heights near 50-50, so interaction and timing is critical. Details to be resolved going forward. Op runs will have some misses, close calls/teases, and some hits. Stay calm.

1768446000-SaTHTLkQFwo.png

1768456800-wjgT5aew8fg.png

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ji said:

dont know what the end result will be but the 18z should be better than the 12z which may not be saying much

My weenie prediction is yesterday's 6z bomb run was to portend how this system ends up as the 18z run from 120hrs out in 2/07 ended up being the red flag for that storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

My weenie prediction is yesterday's 6z bomb run was to portend how this system ends up as the 18z run from 120hrs out in 2/07 ended up being the red flag for that storm.

what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NorthArlington101 said:

Ticking the right way still. OBX can have it this run 

this is one of the few events that can actually trend north/west for us. I would say at 180 hours---we are looking pretty good if you know the GFS biases lol

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That energy digging southward over the western ridge is creating mini ridge out in front and that's problematic. Need that to be weaker or more spacing. Good thing is at this range that probably wont be the actual outcome. As is, it isnt that far from something good.

1768564800-7qVRa5yIAAU.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GreyHat said:

18z GFS show 990L for 16th Jan going off the NC coast with some snow. The storm is shown being pushed out to sea.

maybe u are a time traveler… u are awfully close to the true depiction 

IMG_0118.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brooklynwx99 said:

seems like we’ve trended the TPV more east, allowing for some mid level ridging to sneak into the Lakes and allow HP to fill the cracks. helps the airmass out a lot

IMG_3528.thumb.gif.793a099bb5239a1305bfcdc0637609df.gif

Keep backing up the SW west from over FL to Louisiana and we golden. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...