Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    cryptoblizzard
    Newest Member
    cryptoblizzard
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

@PhineasC not saying your wrong but the QPF didn’t actually match those crazy model output. I know the coop a couple miles from here recorded 19” in that 2009 Storm but on only 1.26”qpf.  We actually had pretty good ratios in most of MD in those storms due to beautifully perfect mid and upper level low passes. 
 

ETA: BWI had 18” on 1.57qpf 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WVclimo said:

I measured 18.8” in Dec ‘09 here (which would make it the largest Dec snowfall on record for this area.)  That storm, iirc, was moving slower than this one should, and had a moisture connection from the deep tropics.  And may have been moving into a colder air mass if I’m not mistaken.  Keeping expectations in check for Wednesday.
 

Yes. 09 was definitely colder. But it appears this one is going to have plenty of juice to work with. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PhineasC said:

I wouldn't expect a HECS from this. The 2009-2010 storms all had massive moisture feeds. The models were printing out 2-2.5"+ as snow across a large area at this range. Not seeing that here. Snow maps aside, the raw liquid totals just aren't there for the widespread 20"+ totals.

I dont know man. The models are saying 1.5 to 2.25 QPF with this one. That is enough for 20 inches with the right ratios.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

@PhineasC not saying your wrong but the QPF didn’t actually match those crazy model output. I know the coop a couple miles from here recorded 19” in that 2009 Storm but on only 1.26”qpf.  We actually had pretty good ratios in most of MD in those storms due to beautifully perfect mid and upper level low passes. 

I feel like there is still a wet bias with these models usually. So in order to get 20" across the area, I would expect to see 2.5" liquid being painted across the area widely. I am seeing a much narrower stripe and lower totals this time. That's all I'm saying. It isn't the firehose that 2009 was. Someone could do OK with banding and the like, but the 2009 and 2010 events just brute-forced their way to big totals across a very large area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Well baltimore city peeps @nw baltimore wx and @North Balti Zen...here we are again literally with line running right through our respective neighborhoods...think we crack the 5" mark for the first time since 2016? :lol:

I’m hoping to break 5”, and I’ll be disappointed if I don’t. I think most areas well west of the bay will ultimately score over 5” as a result of the modeled backside, but it kind of sucks to depend on that.

 

16 minutes ago, Fozz said:

I think he’s just outside the city line. But yes that area is 350’+ and easily on the colder side of the fall line. Helps a lot in marginal situations.

 

21 minutes ago, ravensrule said:

@nw baltimore wx doesn’t live in the city and almost always does better than you. Pikesville is a much better spot than where you live.

Yeah, Pikesville is pretty much at the highest elevation of the beltway at just over 500’. I’m at about 490’, and it definitely helps, but I still mix with sleet at times. Maybe because I’m so close to the city.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, WVclimo said:

I measured 18.8” in Dec ‘09 here (which would make it the largest Dec snowfall on record for this area.)  That storm, iirc, was moving slower than this one should, and had a moisture connection from the deep tropics.  And may have been moving into a colder air mass if I’m not mistaken.  Keeping expectations in check for Wednesday.
 

All of those are true

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, nj2va said:

You/Winchester/Smithburg/Hagerstown/Westminster are going to bullseye I think.  Depending on where the banding sets up, I could see a chance for very localized reports of 2 feet.

I'm thinking I'm in a prime spot here in Smithsburg . About 3 miles from the PA border. If I'm not too far west to get into the CCB I'm thinking I may make a run at 20" but still a long way too go.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

Your prediction that the Euro would trend to the Canadian aged well

Not what I said. I pointed out a trend on the GGEM.

I also pointed out that the GFS's should be tossed because it was turning the storm OTS faster than any other mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

18z EPS has the surface low in exactly the canonical spot, ~50mi off OCMD, at 6z Thursday.  Don't overthink things.  Use the ensembles the way they're supposed to be used for, not agonizing over 5-10mi wiggles in 10:1 snow maps.  Going forward now, we can start seeing mesoscale effects like thermal profiles and banding.  

After 6z Thursday it really doesn't gain much more latitude.  Just moves ENE out to sea.  That's very nice for us.  Better chance the CCB cranks overhead and then snows itself out as the storm moves away. Some of the runs where the CCB is much farther north into the Poconos and NY state had the storm moving toward the benchmark and farther NE.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HighStakes said:

 

That's not too bad for a valley. Much better than the Frederick valley. 

You are in a good spot.

When I worked In Frederick alot of times  there was a huge difference between Frederick and home. Ussually we are 3 to 5 degrees cooler than Frederick and an extra 400 to 500 ft in elevation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

The one thing to hang your hat on as far as precip amounts is the insane consistency of this storm track for seemingly months on end and their proclivity to be prodigious precip producers

I was looking at that earlier today, reviewing my Cocorahs reports.  Roughly every two weeks we have had a wet event:

9/30- 1.44”

10/12- 1.28”

10/29- 1.49”

11/12- 1.32”

11/30- 1.15”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Fozz said:

I think he’s just outside the city line. But yes that area is 350’+ and easily on the colder side of the fall line. Helps a lot in marginal situations.

I am near Mt. washington neighborhood - some elevation here - close enough to NW's hood that he and I tend to have close to the same obs. I am glad in a set-up like this I am not over closer to 95. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris78 said:

When I worked In Frederick alot of times  there was a huge difference between Frederick and home. Ussually we are 3 to 5 degrees cooler than Frederick and an extra 400 to 500 ft in elevation.

I sit in a valley here at approximately 860-870ft. My parents live about 1.5 miles south of me on top of a ridge at roughly 1100ft. PSU lives directly behind me on the top of the Doug Hill ridge over 1000 ft. up literally a stones throw away. There's 1 more ridge about 1.5 miles north of my house that gets up as high as 1130ft. Sometimes in marginal ice situations my trees are just wet but I can look up on PSU' s ridge and see the trees are iced over. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

Please excuse the novice question, but what is "the benchmark"?

40N/70W is the classic location from the KU book for major east coast snow storms.  That's past our latitude, but when it's at the benchmark a storm is usually about to hit NYC and Boston.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, clskinsfan said:

@WinterWxLuvr Here is the link to that thread in the NYC forum. The 3 hour pressure change map is in there I think. Also for everyone else this is a good thread to bookmark for storms:

Actually. Disregard this. It appears most of the maps are no longer active in this thread. 

 

 

I can’t figure out how to use it lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...