Ginx snewx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Nice try, I'm not trying to steal your snow Steve, Congrats, I will keep this on the back burnerlol its true, there is no snow to steal from me unless you want meh rates. I think this could be a big deal for my work though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 They increased QPF again. This is why powderfreak would stare at them until the last drop was gone from his bottle of jack. If they keep it up, it'll be congrats Montreal by the time it starts snowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 lol its true, there is no snow to steal from me unless you want meh rates. I think this could be a big deal for my work though. Further south the better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Tuck that low 20 miles north and that inflow deform really crushes the south coast. Total now cast for them. I give more credence to mesos like the RGEM inside 24 for that stuff. Totally immersed in this on my day off. What a beastDefinitely a high stakes now cast for the south coasts..I'm pretty excited to track it.I think if the meso's hold serve at 18z and 00z, we're going to have to start factoring them in a bit more. Unless they are THAT bad, which is entirely possible, especially the SREFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Valley Snowman Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 The thing about the NAM sim radar is that it generally drops qpf under it...so in that sense, the qpf is lining up pretty well. Ther'es been snow in extreme southern Ohio and SW PA. So in general, do the models account for virga in their computations, qpf numbers, mass fields, radar depiction etc.,? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Jeff likes being a wet blanket when he has zero stake. I will totally enjoy my forecasted 2 -3 inches and hope the Globals continue to inch north. Haha what was the wet blanket about? I didn't get that feeling but I know it's different when you're on the edge already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 So in general, do the models account for virga in their computations, qpf numbers, mass fields, radar depiction etc.,? I think that is all factored in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 If they keep it up, it'll be congrats Montreal by the time it starts snowing. There was one ARW last night that did just that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Haha what was the wet blanket about? I didn't get that feeling but I know it's different when you're on the edge already. Yeah, I don't know i thought i have been more civil then others lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 So in general, do the models account for virga in their computations, qpf numbers, mass fields, radar depiction etc.,? idk about the sim radar, but yeah...virga for sure. I actually thought they did try to simulate the radar with virga as well, but if Will says no then it probably doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 19z vs 18z Shield has already advanced at least to what was depicted at 21z on NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 There was one ARW last night that did just that. One of the runs last night member ARP4 had 16.50" here............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Here's your 2pm present wx.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 So in general, do the models account for virga in their computations, qpf numbers, mass fields, radar depiction etc.,? Disclaimer: I truly know nothing about this. But simulated reflectivity is just that, simulated. So I'm guessing it is somehow reverse engineering QPF to reflectivity. Example, 0.01" QPF gets a dBZ of 10, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 i like nyc banding potential. on the north edge of modeled heavy qpf with subsidence to the north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 i like nyc banding potential. on the north edge of modeled heavy qpf with subsidence to the north Yeah, you guys look increasingly solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Haha what was the wet blanket about? I didn't get that feeling but I know it's different when you're on the edge already.He and I are good friends, he knows what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 So in general, do the models account for virga in their computations, qpf numbers, mass fields, radar depiction etc.,? I think it's more that sometimes they over moisten the northern edge, as you often get a dry northerly flow at the SFC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Here's your 2pm present wx.... wx01221619zMA.gif Seven springs PA reporting snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Beware the models weenie bands south ..that end up north. The Freak rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Disclaimer: I truly know nothing about this. But simulated reflectivity is just that, simulated. So I'm guessing it is somehow reverse engineering QPF to reflectivity. Example, 0.01" QPF gets a dBZ of 10, etc. That's what I thought. It's all connected to the QPF fields and how much it's printing out in the 1-3-6 hour time frame being analyzed, is what it's "simulated radar" is showing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Nam out to 3 let's see what fun it brings us this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Beware the models weenie bands south ..that end up north. The Freak rule Watch those 700mb-500mb fronto plots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 That's what I thought. It's all connected to the QPF fields and how much it's printing out in the 1-3-6 hour time frame being analyzed, is what it's "simulated radar" is showing. I'm pretty sure I've seen simulated radar echoes up here before with nada QPF. We'll have to watch it with this system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I'm pretty sure I've seen simulated radar echoes up here before with nada QPF. We'll have to watch it with this system. It's definitely possible. Like most models simulated cloud cover based off RH fields at various levels, but the RGEM actually explicitly forecasts clouds. It doesn't just infer them. So if the Canadians can do it, why can't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Pressure falls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 I'm pretty sure I've seen simulated radar echoes up here before with nada QPF. We'll have to watch it with this system. Yeah I guess I haven't paid that much attention to those products. I just figured if you are under radar echoes it would at least do a 0.01" for that 6-hour block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Here's your 2pm present wx.... wx01221619zMA.gif A more robust view IMHO: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lakeeffectkid383 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 To my eyes the nam looks a bit north of 12z... But then again I'm half blind so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 To my eyes the nam looks a bit north of 12z... But then again I'm half blind so... The Scooter Sh**streak looks slightly worse, but the ULL is also stronger/larger again...we'll see if that translates to any meaningful change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.