Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

December 2023


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

As the board has evolved and many of have been positing for 10-20+ years, lots of personal relationships have been developed and that certainly bleeds into posting style and habits. It's definitely great to have a mixture of fun and science but it seems like the fun/ribbing posts have started to outweigh great analysis/discussion the past several-plus years. Perhaps that is largely due to just not having much to discuss, but often times when great discussions start it ends up getting drowned out.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The pattern right now is almost a carbon copy of Dec 1994 on the longwave look....I don't think we get out of it until late month.

I think in my winter outlook I referenced one of my concerns was getting caught in a 1994-1995 type pattern. I thought/still think our saving grace is going to be from an Arctic which becomes more favorable...but we're probably going to need to see the PAC at least become somewhat favorable (at least to unload cold into Canada) or we really could be screwed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, leo2000 said:

I was just looking at the GEFS chart for the mjo shows it going to phase 8 just around Christmas it has sped it up. 

Yeah, we cooled down late that month and into early January but then we had a monster MJO wave right back into phases 4/5/6 in Jan 1995 which reignited the torch until February that season.

I do think the prospects of a much better arctic region are there for this winter versus that one. So hopefully we can start cashing in on some chances pretty quickly once we go into MJO 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

I think in my winter outlook I referenced one of my concerns was getting caught in a 1994-1995 type pattern. I thought/still think our saving grace is going to be from an Arctic which becomes more favorable...but we're probably going to need to see the PAC at least become somewhat favorable (at least to unload cold into Canada) or we really could be screwed. 

Yes, that was the underlying theme of my work. If we had a strong PV, then turn out the lights and and wait for spring training.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yes, that was the underlying theme of my work. If we had a strong PV, then turn out the lights and and wait for spring training.

I think it was @brooklynwx99 who posted this yesterday (or maybe it was Tip) but the EQBO is really helping to keep the PV in check. I hate having to rely on SSW's but if we can somehow muster up a SSW (and on our side of the globe) that could be what helps drive things in a more favorable direction. 

If we have to wait for the MJO to progress into a more favorable phase...I'm going to start losing my confidence in a better January/February. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

I think it was @brooklynwx99 who posted this yesterday (or maybe it was Tip) but the EQBO is really helping to keep the PV in check. I hate having to rely on SSW's but if we can somehow muster up a SSW (and on our side of the globe) that could be what helps drive things in a more favorable direction. 

If we have to wait for the MJO to progress into a more favorable phase...I'm going to start losing my confidence in a better January/February. 

This season will be an interesting test because in my mind, the polar domain was all that separated this season from a year like 1994 or 2006...if winter goes onto suck anyway, then yea....I would rethink some things. That said, I am not concerned at this point.....December should have been mild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

This season will be an interesting test because in my mind, the polar domain was all the separated this season from a year like 1994 or 2006...if winter goes onto suck anyway, then yea....I would rethink some things. That said, I am not concerned at this point.....December should have been mild.

Totally on the same page as you. 

There was more I wish I had the opportunity to dig into before attempting an outlook but just didn't have the time. If this winter does suck though there is definitely going to have to be some re-thinking.

I know you focus alot of your composites on ENSO event post 1950 and I've been going back to 1900 (obviously when looking at earlier years there has to be awareness about the validity and accuracy of some of the data) but just from what I've looked at with EL Nino events...there is a striking change in how EL Nino's have behaved over the past 30 years. There certainly are numerous reasons for this but too me it's pretty striking. I'm starting to work on La Nina's now so I'm curious if the same is true of La Nina. 

You made an incredible point though in your winter outlook when discussing SST's in the Pacific. The lack of a gradient within the equatorial PAC basin is pretty striking and that is going to have major impacts on pressure centers, etc.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Yeah, we cooled down late that month and into early January but then we had a monster MJO wave right back into phases 4/5/6 in Jan 1995 which reignited the torch until February that season.

I do think the prospects of a much better arctic region are there for this winter versus that one. So hopefully we can start cashing in on some chances pretty quickly once we go into MJO 8.

I remember only one decent storm that year, I think I got a foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

As the board has evolved and many of have been positing for 10-20+ years, lots of personal relationships have been developed and that certainly bleeds into posting style and habits. It's definitely great to have a mixture of fun and science but it seems like the fun/ribbing posts have started to outweigh great analysis/discussion the past several-plus years. Perhaps that is largely due to just not having much to discuss, but often times when great discussions start it ends up getting drowned out.

:blahblah:

I'm just kidding, this is a good point.

also, I have been impressed with your work here this year, it is easy to tell that not only do you have your own thoughts, you are not married to them and you continue to try to learn. good on you.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

heh, so far we've seen just about every plausible rendition of what that thing early next week will mean for the area without any one version repeating across successive model runs.

 

watch it just become a weak wave and rapidly weaken after doing what it does in Florida and we get nothing except thin wispy cirrus and winter's version of Bermuda blues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Lava Rock said:

10" rain. :rolleyes:okie dokie

Farmington co-op had 10" come down on December 26-27/1969 (though it's a bit suspicious as no one else in the region had more than about 7").  Started with 15" SN then poured as temp rose to 50°.  Was also BTV's top snowfall until 2010 topped it.

Nice to see a sunny day, with modest temps.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

watch it just become a weak wave and rapidly weaken after doing what it does in Florida and we get nothing except thin wispy cirrus and winter's version of Bermuda blues. 

I wouldn't be surprised ...  I put it at 50/50:   minoring out vs majoring in

The problem is we have two 'unmanned firehoses' in the guidance.  The southern stream has very little continuity with details, while the N stream is occasionally dumping some phase in at irregular amounts across successive runs.

Between those two flopping hoses we are stuck in a realm of utter "misguidance"

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...