Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Jan 6/7 "Event" and obs


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, HighStakes said:

Absolutely.

We have members here that have thousands of posts over many years and never have they ever had 1 positive post.

I just keep scrolling when they post, as I assume many do when I post. lol

Just now, StormchaserChuck! said:

here.. accurate totals

gfs_namer_054_snodpth_chng.gifb

I can't read that. Can you? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StormchaserChuck! said:

Yeah, we're going to get less than 1".. 1-2" if we're lucky

Someone explained this to you yesterday. This is a snow depth change map, not a snowfall map. We're losing snow to melt in the next 36 hours, so any snow that falls on Thursday night is starting from a snow depth deficit.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mattie g said:

Someone explained this to you yesterday. This is a snow depth change map, not a snowfall map. We're losing snow to melt in the next 36 hours, so any snow that falls on Thursday night is starting from a snow depth deficit.

sorry, 1-2 for all

  • Haha 6
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mattie g said:

Someone explained this to you yesterday. This is a snow depth change map, not a snowfall map. We're losing snow to melt in the next 36 hours, so any snow that falls on Thursday night is starting from a snow depth deficit.

It doesn’t matter. It shows a miserable result and that’s what’s important to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leesburg 04 said:

Ok so apparently DD and Maestro are the same person and Chuck and amped are the same person. I'm thinking in total there are only 12-15 posters on this entire board

Lol don't compare me to Maestro. Its sad that every model gives me 3" and I have to assume I'm getting 1-2 if we're lucky. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, StormchaserChuck! said:

here.. accurate totals

gfs_namer_054_snodpth_chng.gifb

 

6 minutes ago, mappy said:

I can't read that. Can you? 

I believe @high risk explained this type of plot the other day.  As I recall, it represents the total snow depth change through the time period (in this case through 54 hours from 12Z today).  It's not the same as what TT and other sites show, which gives the snow depth of the event itself.  Keeping in mind that today and tomorrow there will surely be a decent amount of snow melt (being above freezing), I can see a net of zero or not very much considering that.  But that's not indicative of how much falls for this particular event by itself.

Of course, we may "only" see less than an inch or 1-2", but you get the idea.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Always in Zugzwang said:

 

I believe @high risk explained this type of plot the other day.  As I recall, it represents the total snow depth change through the time period (in this case through 54 hours from 12Z today).  It's not the same as what TT and other sites show, which gives the snow depth of the event itself.  Keeping in mind that today and tomorrow there will surely be a decent amount of snow melt (being above freezing), I can see a net of zero or not very much considering that.  But that's not indicative of how much falls for this particular event by itself.

Of course, we may "only" see less than an inch or 1-2", but you get the idea.

Yes, I've been watching it for 4 years. What falls, not in 6 hours, but overall is reprented. Totals were always lower when that map was low. simple mmk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...