Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

December 2020 Discussion


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ginx snewx said:

What a joy you are. Lol no it means snow chances dumb dumb

Whatever Steve.  Its all tongue in cheek and humor with me.  To take a comment saying that I am going to close the shades for 2 weeks and hide out in the dark as a legit, serious statement is on you.  Snow is great, but in all honesty it doesn't matter.

Have a Merry Christmas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Cold Miser said:

Whatever Steve.  Its all tongue in cheek and humor with me.  To take a comment saying that I am going to close the shades for 2 weeks and hide out in the dark as a legit, serious statement is on you.  Snow is great, but in all honesty it doesn't matter.

Have a Merry Christmas. 

Hide the chickens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/7/2020 at 12:32 PM, klw said:

12 Z GFS with the annual Grinch storm falling on Festivus this year.  It is hour 384 but in our hearts we know it will happen as it does almost every year. (Yes I know it gives me snow as shown)  We could have started the thread for this back in June had we wanted.

 

gfs_mslp_pcpn_frzn_neus_63.png

 

Sad bump

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

There's always a chance some sort of sfc CAD sets up, but we'll need some sort of confluence to develop for that...even if kind of weak. Right now, there is nothing...it literally wants to rip the low into Hudson Bay....that's about the worst possible setup. :
 

But we'll see if things change on guidance over the next 36 hours....I think the 3 best ways to avoid a disaster cutter are

1. Make the system more progressive and whiff on a phase which turns it into kind of a quick dryish FROPA on Xmas eve...still mild but not 12 hours of tropical dewpoitns and heavy rains. It would be through quite quickly.

2. Have the 12/21-22 system deepen and phase more with the arctic jet/PV lobe and that would create more of a pseudo block and probably promote more confluence in Quebec....which in turn, would produce CAD even if the system tried to cut west....you'd drastically reduce the warmth.

3. Bury the energy coming onshore in the southwest so that the whole thing turns completely flat....you'd end up with an overrunning situation or nothing at all

 

so there's a chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...