Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,631
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

January 24-26: Miracle or Mirage OBS Thread!


Jebman
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, H2O said:

Quick question for the experts like @wxmeddler and @MN Transplant and or all other mets/smart people

On Radarscope which radar/tilt/reflectivity is best to see when returns are close to surface and not virga?  Are radars like TADW better to see that than KLWX?

I'm not exactly sure I'm following your questions, as all radar's will show the "hole" if/when virga is present.  If you're asking, which radar beam will be scanning closest near the ground IMBY, it's generally the closest to you geographically and the lowest tilt (tilt 1). I dont exactly recall where you live (it's been a minute), but I think the TADW would be scanning lowest for you and would give you the best idea when it would start reaching the ground.  However, once we get into the storm and we get a melting layer it's probably going to get attenuated all to hell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scuddz said:

I'm not exactly sure I'm following your questions, as all radar's will show the "hole" if/when virga is present.  If you're asking, which radar beam will be scanning closest near the ground IMBY, it's generally the closest to you geographically and the lowest tilt (tilt 1). I dont exactly recall where you live (it's been a minute), but I think the TADW would be scanning lowest for you and would give you the best idea when it would start reaching the ground.  However, once we get into the storm and we get a melting layer it's probably going to get attenuated all to hell. 

...Then he remembers that we all have location identifiers in our profiles.... 

 

Yes, TADW would be lowest, much closer, and I think TDWRs scan at a lower angle than NEXRADs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Scuddz said:

...Then he remembers that we all have location identifiers in our profiles.... 

 

Yes, TADW would be lowest, much closer, and I think TDWRs scan at a lower angle than NEXRADs

That’s more or less what I was asking. Basically I want to know which radar will show the least agonizing wait for snow to fill in. This beltway donut sucks ass

 

Thanks for the reply. Appreciate it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Light snow starting to accumulate now. It's a sand like quality and not puffy flakes. I don't have high expectations but maybe things will rip for a few hours with normal dendrites 

Yeh man these flakes don’t look like what usually see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wxdude64 said:

After TWO HOURS of very light snow, have enough for the ground to be white, lol. Currently 15.8/3.0, light snow and ENE wind at 6 mph. 

So, we DID start a lot earlier than what NWS was calling for, but the 2 hours of snizzle and, as @Bob Chill said, sand took forever to accumulate to making everything white. The flake size has definitely increased in last 20 minutes and visibilities are down in the 1-2 mile range now compared to the 5-7 mile vis earlier. Just a holler to those upstream. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rvarookie said:

Yeh man these flakes don’t look like what usually see. 

arctic dust. it's not often we have the airmass to support it. 

We had a storm maybe 10-ish years ago where it was 15 at onset and we managed to squeeze out an inch but the ratio was like 6:1.   Good luck getting the dendrites 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...