Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

March Medium/Long Range Thread: The Empire Strikes Back


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mattie g said:

I love how we think "What an amazing signal at XX days" when the ensemble snow map shows like 3.4" while it shows 28" in SNE. I mean...what kind of signal would *that* be?

:lol:

Wow, didn't even notice that. What a wicked signal on an ens mean. Might be the most snow I've ever seen on an ens mean not in the mountains.

edit: guess half of this is from a storm tomorrow that I somehow didn't notice they were having. Still nuts.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mattie g said:

I love how we think "What an amazing signal at XX days" when the ensemble snow map shows like 3.4" while it shows 28" in SNE. I mean...what kind of signal would *that* be?

:lol:

This is a good point and I agree with you, but that map also includes the 5-18" PA, upstate NY, and southern NE are getting this weekend to be fair.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stratosphere is warming again. This is a pretty severe warming. 

compday.iE0sNa6QGD.gif.aa40167a281c04f86e76b670f6c44d8b.gif

There is a 10-15 day lag at this time of the year with 500mb NAO correlation. It's been a nonstop 10mb warm phase since February 15 (15-28). 

What's interesting is that I had another and unrelated factor which is a -NAO signal until March 19th (3.9-19): This year-to-year change has been hitting pretty hard in verification for 2 years. These are two really strong factors. If the -NAO really lifts out the 10th/11, it will say to me that it doesn't have any staying power at this time, which is what I theorized because the Pacific always had an opposite correlation to EC cold when the NAO was negative/positive-cold. I also think there is a high bust-potential, (vs model verification accuracy) that/for -NAO conditions March 11-19. I also think this gravity could slightly make our storm have colder stay power on model trend, but I don't like what happens in the Pacific after March 11. The Pacific may equalize it out, and when that High leaves Alaska, it's game over as far as our snow chances goes. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Stratosphere is warming again. This is a pretty severe warming. 

compday.iE0sNa6QGD.gif.aa40167a281c04f86e76b670f6c44d8b.gif

There is a 10-15 day lag at this time of the year with 500mb NAO correlation. It's been a nonstop 10mb warm phase since February 15 (15-28). 

What's interesting is that I had another and unrelated factor which is a -NAO signal until March 19th (3.9-19): This year-to-year change has been hitting pretty hard in verification for 2 years. If the -NAO really lifts out the 10th/11, it will say to me that it doesn't have any staying power at this time, which is what I theorized because the Pacific always had an opposite correlation to EC cold when the NAO was negative/positive-cold. I also think there is a high bust-potential, (vs model verification accuracy) that/for -NAO conditions March 11-19. I also think this gravity could slightly make our storm have colder stay power on model trend, but I don't like what happens in the Pacific after March 11. The Pacific may equalize it out, and when that High leaves Alaska, it's game over as far as our snow chances goes. 

Isn't this a regular occurrence late winter/early spring every year tho? I know mid winter it is rare. I'm not as versed in SSWEs as some. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

Isn't this a regular occurrence late winter/early spring every year tho? I know mid winter it is rare. I'm not as versed in SSWEs as some. 

Oct 30-Nov 15: 60 day correlation to 500mb

Nov 15-30: 40-45 day correlation to 500mb

Dec 1-31: 30-40 day correlation to 500mb

Jan 1-31: 20-30 day correlation to 500mb

Feb 1-28: 15-25 day correlation to 500mb. etc. 

They aren't common, as these are anomalies vs the climo-norm. Here's a graph. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your question? 

10mb9065.png

I'm really impressed with the predictable lead time of D+15 in this 10mb warming to +600dm -NAO. Pretty classic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...