Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

March Medium/Long Range Thread: The Empire Strikes Back


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

Yep, 120 digging nto the SW now. Big -pna

At the same time the GFS depicts a stronger block and 50/50 signature. Might not be enough to offset it but this is a ridiculous look, major-PNA or not.. but seasonal trends look to be a bit stingy. 

gfs-deterministic-namer-z500_anom-8320000.thumb.png.07b2721d2547a372b547f91959b6ed51.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

that still doesn’t even look bad with the absolutely insane block in place. let the run play out and then look at the ENS

So far

 

3 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

look at the NW flow in place over the NE US. this is not gonna be a typical solution that you’d see with a S/W that strong over the SW US. this might just go underneath

2978827C-D18A-4FDE-8E95-7D3CA6B4F65A.thumb.png.67f69d6e75a628c91d8f54e6b22ec01e.png

So far, your pronouncement is looking more right than not.  It's digging in and being pushed south a bit.  Again, doesn't mean is gonna play out that way, just relaying what is going on current.  Can't make a prediction yet

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

So far

 

So far, your pronouncement is looking more right than not.  It's digging in and being pushed south a bit.  Again, doesn't mean is gonna play out that way, just relaying what is going on current.  Can't make a prediction yet

any strong wave versus this block is basically an immovable object versus a not completely unstoppable force (the vort). a block of this magnitude will win the vast majority of the time 

look at the persistent negative height anomalies from the gyre in the N Atl 

96249F23-D78B-42D2-BD4F-C447C46D31A9.thumb.png.aa1561132f30cc8c6261e85b6dd2b650.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta try not to get sucked into the run to run variance at this stage. I kind of agree that with a loaded setup like this, you kind of have to trust the features to ultimately deliver. Doesn’t mean they will, but you have to hope that’s the case at least. If we can’t get a coastal / snow event with this kind of setup, man… I’ll defer to PSU on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

It's trying to build heights out in front, but it can't so far.

this is why I hate hate hate when people say -NAOs are overrated. bullshit. this thing would be over the Dakotas and we’d be in the 70s if not for it

instead, it might actually force a 3 sigma trough to the south. unreal

  • Like 9
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...