Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,510
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Currently monitoring guidance for March late 3rd through the 4th for the next ( beyond the 28th) significant event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DomNH said:

Yeah I tend to agree, but I don’t really see this as a typical SWFE get in get out either. Very annoying.

Quite frustrating. I keep thinking too how much the convection which evolves through the day tomorrow will impact the system. 

I'm really starting to think though this is going to be a major dud. Looking at the GFS QPF it's very encouraging, however, the column really starts to dry quickly. The whole system just looks extremely messy. If anything, there will probably be a very narrow corridor that gets hit decent...but it's over a short duration. I don't think we'll end up seeing widespread QPF as aggressive as the GFS has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

So much for the establishing west based -nao doing it’s thing. 

This would be a full-on cutter if it weren't for the -NAO....but at some point you reach an equilibrium which is where we are close to now...so we see these wobbles....colder, warmer, colder, warmer has been the trend the last 3 or 4 cycles.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Winter Wizard said:

image.thumb.png.c35fabc969b5bb64d63edd0d4fa13be9.png

 

Gotta say this sounding isn't doing very much for me...not only do you have the warm nose within a margin of error, degree wise and temperature wise, but snow growth is unimpressive after an initial front end burst. Would exercise caution about using the Kuchera map here, as usual. 

Looks fine to me over here, but this isn't done wobbling one way or the other

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

This would be a full-on cutter if it weren't for the -NAO....but at some point you reach an equilibrium which is where we are close to now...so we see these wobbles....colder, warmer, colder, warmer has been the trend the last 3 or 4 cycles.

Oh, definitely but I would have bet against warmer trends looking at this:

gfs_z500a_namer_10.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I could care less what it shows, That and the GGEM too.

GFS/Euro are going to get like 90% of the weight in a 3 day forecast....prob reduced to like 60-70% inside of 48h where NAM and other mesos can pick up some of the slack.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, UnitedWx said:

Looks fine to me over here, but this isn't done wobbling one way or the other

Even out there I see concerns with snow growth on the soundings. Certainly will continue to see wobbles in either direction, and I'm not saying that's the apt solution, but it shows just how quickly this threat can fall apart by only a slight margin of error. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

GFS/Euro are going to get like 90% of the weight in a 3 day forecast....prob reduced to like 60-70% inside of 48h where NAM and other mesos can pick up some of the slack.

I agree here, I think the mesos ended up doing a decent job with yesterdays as well as we got closer, Even the Euro qpf wise, Was inline with what i had for a total, GFS was to high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Winter Wizard said:

Even out there I see concerns with snow growth on the soundings. Certainly will continue to see wobbles in either direction, and I'm not saying that's the apt solution, but it shows just how quickly this threat can fall apart by only a slight margin of error. 

Headline of Winter 22-23 right there.  Not biting yet.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dryslot said:

I agree here, I think the mesos ended up doing a decent job with yesterdays.

Yeah once inside of 24h, they usually get most of the weight. Euro has had its share of duds inside of 24h this season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's subtle but the GEFS trending towards other warmer guidance the past 2 model cycles.

The WAR hook-up that we have seen so often this season, with confluence in place. This translates to much more of an easterly fetch despite the Canadian high in a good spot (initially). The cold canadian dews fighting the dews advecting off the atlantic. 

45b9f598-c6ac-42ba-9328-759e804c00d8.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Oh, definitely but I would have bet against warmer trends looking at this:

gfs_z500a_namer_10.png

Lack of consolidated block & 50/50. Heights are high and low where they need to be but it's strung out.

That's a problem given how the Pacific side looks. If the Pacific were a little better then this could work. 

It'll be good enough for C/NNE with some front end frozen further south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...