Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,566
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Monty
    Newest Member
    Monty
    Joined

Hurricane Ian


Scott747
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bubbler86 said:

Not political just commenting on a person of status, the Gov of Florida just did an interview on TWC and when talking about why people may not have evacuated he pointed out the GFS showing the storm hitting the Panhandle as one reason. 

That wouldn't surprise me. So much stock is put in these models so far in advance and people get the "it won't hit here" mentality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winds picked up and are blasting against my windows. Simultaneously, temperature and dew point has dropped drastically, and I went outside and it feels like Fall! 
 

Ian dragged the 1st cold front of the season down here. 
 

likewise, this is not really a tropical cyclone anymore. It’s definitely sub-tropical at this point, and soon to be extra-tropical.

Not to be underestimated tho, sub-tropical cyclones like Ian have enormous wind fields. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, smokeybandit said:

That wouldn't surprise me. So much stock is put in these models so far in advance and people get the "it won't hit here" mentality.

This is my biggest problem with the way the NHC/MEDIA informs the public on hurricanes.  You always hear "forecasted to make landfall at xxxx location at xxxx wind speed".  People don't have the patience or understanding to look at the cone or listen to a forecast discussion about possible strengthening beyond the forecast intensity.  I would much rather the forecast to be simply to read out the locations within the cone of uncertainty, and to give percentages on possible strength at landfall.  If they know they can't predict the exact landfall  location and strength at landfall, they need to stop telling people that information like they can.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ATDoel said:

This is my biggest problem with the way the NHC/MEDIA informs the public on hurricanes.  You always hear "forecasted to make landfall at xxxx location at xxxx wind speed".  People don't have the patience or understanding to look at the cone or listen to a forecast discussion about possible strengthening beyond the forecast intensity.  I would much rather the forecast to be simply to read out the locations within the cone of uncertainty, and to give percentages on possible strength at landfall.  If they know they can't predict the exact landfall  location and strength at landfall, they need to stop telling people that information like they can.

"I would have evacuated but they gave it a 15% chance of being a category 1"

"I would have evacuated but they were listing off all the possible locations and I didn't have time for that."

The only thing that'll improve forecasts is to better fund the National Weather Service and all other public weather agencies like the NHC. They are so severely under funded it's ridiculous.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...AIR FORCE HURRICANE HUNTERS FIND IAN A LITTLE 
STRONGER...

Reports from an Air Force Hurricane Hunter aircraft indicate 
that Ian's maximum winds have increased to near 85 mph (140 
km/h).

SUMMARY OF 1115 PM EDT...0315 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...30.2N 79.3W
ABOUT 185 MI...295 KM S OF CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA
ABOUT 265 MI...430 KM SSW OF CAPE FEAR NORTH CAROLINA
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...85 MPH...140 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...NNE OR 30 DEGREES AT 10 MPH...17 KM/H
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...984 MB...29.06 INCHES
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s very impressive, Irma for comparison was 125 TJ
To be fair that calculator isn't doing a complete spatial integration so it is likely over estimating the true IKE possibly by a lot. For point of comparison the same calculator using the Sandy NHC advisory yields 300 TJ if I'm remembering correctly. But yeah it's still very impressive and people should be advised not to scoff at Ian's cat 1 status.

Sent from my Pixel 5a using Tapatalk

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

0Z UKMET is a little SW of the prior two runs with landfall near Georgetown instead of just SW of Myrtle Beach:

 HURRICANE IAN        ANALYSED POSITION : 29.5N  79.5W

     ATCF IDENTIFIER : AL092022

                        LEAD                 CENTRAL     MAXIMUM WIND
      VERIFYING TIME    TIME   POSITION   PRESSURE (MB)  SPEED (KNOTS)
      --------------    ----   --------   -------------  -------------
    0000UTC 30.09.2022    0  29.5N  79.5W      988            58
    1200UTC 30.09.2022   12  31.4N  79.2W      984            55
    0000UTC 01.10.2022   24  34.5N  79.4W      987            37
    1200UTC 01.10.2022   36  35.7N  80.4W     1002            25
    0000UTC 02.10.2022   48              CEASED TRACKING

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jm1220 said:

My town had no power for a month because of the power infrastructure problem FL will be dealing with. Places that didn’t flood in Sandy did get the power back in a week or so, and crews from IN and MO were in my town working on it. In areas that had saltwater intrusion into any power infrastructure it likely needs to be rebuilt entirely. Anything electric/metallic, the salt water destroys. 

I feel like I was lucky to get power back in 25 hours

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jm1220 said:

My town had no power for a month because of the power infrastructure problem FL will be dealing with. Places that didn’t flood in Sandy did get the power back in a week or so, and crews from IN and MO were in my town working on it. In areas that had saltwater intrusion into any power infrastructure it likely needs to be rebuilt entirely. Anything electric/metallic, the salt water destroys. 

Unfortunately parts of Florida is most likely looking at several weeks at least. It will really depend on how terribly the infrastructure took a hit, however, I have a feeling entire Substations are destroyed. 

Furthermore, I wonder how hard a hit the Fort Meyers Power Plant took. Surge would have been enough to destroy quite a bit of equipment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost no net movement 11PM to 2AM  (only ~3 mph) per NHC coordinates wasn't totally unexpected based on the Euro and UKMET as they had very slow movement then. However, they both had it speed up quite a bit from 2AM through 5AM. So, look for an increase in speed to start soon. If it doesn't and the 5AM is near the 2AM position, then we'd know the models are off.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thread on severe inland flooding in central Florida in the Orlando-Kissimmee metro area.  That area contains hundreds of small lakes, basically a sitting duck for flooding when heavy rains hit.  However, this flooding is clearly historic!  A thread of videos and photos of the inland flooding in central FL:
 

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jconsor said:

Thread on severe inland flooding in central Florida in the Orlando-Kissimmee metro area.  That area contains hundreds of small lakes, basically a sitting duck for flooding when heavy rains hit.  However, this flooding is clearly historic!  A thread of videos and photos of the inland flooding in central FL:
 

 

Those images almost remind me of the tragic flooding pics of Harvey in TX around the developments, although so far Ian hasn't reached the obscenely excessive levels of rain that Harvey produced as a cutoff 'caine that just meandered around SE TX sucking in GOM moisture, and depositing it beneath where it traveled.  Will have to see how close it does get to that amount of rain though.

Ian has slowed a bit from the last update per the 5 am -

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...