dryslot Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Lop off 1/3rd on the qpf is a good rule for the Nam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Rob Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Less than a foot in Boston per Nam? Or am I missing something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 NAM is over 1" of liquid here 15z-18z lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: This thing is Juiced big time...holy smokes!! I do realize it's the NAM so I'm tempering that a bit..but just incredible on the juice this seems to have. Look at that moisture fetch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, White Rain said: The QPF the NAM prints out should show higher snow amounts in ORH county if it is all snow. It is clearly implying some mixing. Not sure how realistic that is with a track like it has. The 3 hourly soundings didn't show any mixing at ORH, but there's some layers that get to like -1 or -2C...so if it was kuchera map, they would bring amounts down a bit if it gets close like that. I really wouldn't worry about the clown maps even though people love to look at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 NAM 850s get to 2.3 at BOS NAM para maxes 0.8. Para is the regular NAM in 2 days. Which one is right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Hoth said: Look at that moisture fetch. All that convection near Miss in the Gulf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, weathafella said: NAM 850s get to 2.3 at BOS NAM para maxes 0.8. Para is the regular NAM in 2 days. Which one is right? Probably neither. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, weathafella said: NAM 850s get to 2.3 at BOS NAM para maxes 0.8. Para is the regular NAM in 2 days. Which one is right? Thanks for all the spacing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Was waiting for James to start weenieing out over the the Mobile radar, but realized he already blew his five posts talking about 850mb wind on the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: Thanks for all the spacing You don't see the pictures in between? Great graphics Jerry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Am I going to get any snow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyewall Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 If you took 1.5 inches of QPF the NAM gives us along with the forecast 12:1 ratios we could see 16-20 if that verified. Obviously I am not going to take 1 model run and go with it but I think we are solid in verifying double digits here unless a shadow screw job ensues that isn't being picked up. Either way I would still think there would be a period of CPV channeling when the fluff factor is in effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRSno Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, RI Rob said: Less than a foot in Boston per Nam? Or am I missing something. I guess it depends on ratios, but this run sure looks like under a foot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxsniss Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 12z NAM track very close to 6z RGEM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Miser Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 What are the thoughts on mixing and how far inland it reaches, both from the coast of CT, and From the coasts of R.I. and Mass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, weathafella said: NAM 850s get to 2.3 at BOS NAM para maxes 0.8. Para is the regular NAM in 2 days. Which one is right? Boston will change over My question is wether there is mid level dry air in Merrimack valley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, ROOSTA said: You don't see the pictures in between? Great graphics Jerry! There is no pics in that post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 5 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: The 3 hourly soundings didn't show any mixing at ORH, but there's some layers that get to like -1 or -2C...so if it was kuchera map, they would bring amounts down a bit if it gets close like that. I really wouldn't worry about the clown maps even though people love to look at them. The NAM is acting strange with this storm. Usual a tight temp profile and track like that over Nan Bay to Cape Elbow would actually would be better for us. So I'm not too sure what to make of this. Can't wait to see how the 12Z GFS behaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 The NAM snow maps are god awful. Useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, Greg said: The NAM is acting strange with this storm. Usual a tight temp profile and track like that over Nan Bay to Cape Elbow would actually would be better for us. So I'm not too sure what to make of this. Can't wait to see how the 12Z GFS behaves. I bet it tics west Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said: Boston will change over I'm not convinced they will yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I think the wind is phenomenal at Logon on this NAM run... The grid has 47 kt sustain mid BL flow ...which is like airline tire altitudes ... that's a slam dunk for 60 mph gust coming into the coast! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, SouthCoastMA said: The NAM snow maps are god awful. Useless Keep in mind, it's still the NAM with its high wet bulb despite upgrades and north west bias. There will be a model correction in there somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, dryslot said: There is no pics in that post. Shhh, the whole world knows that. Just keeping some "in-the-woods" as to say. Most always one should lean to Climo, thought all along Rt128 S and E would be the teeter zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RI Rob Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said: I'm not convinced they will yet. Pretty complicated forecast less then 24 hours from the start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 I think this is a pretty easy 12-20'' final call for those that stay all snow N CT to ORH to LWM and west. I don't think slight east or west ticks is going to change that range. And the NAM is probably on crack with widespread 2-2.5'' of QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRSno Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said: I'm not convinced they will yet. Right now it's either the change over or the dryslot, either way things to keep in mind. Is there room for this to trend east? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxsniss Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Just now, ORH_wxman said: I'm not convinced they will yet. Interesting. NAM/RGEM (I know RGEM a little out of it's range) are clustering pretty tight and change Boston over. Need a last night's Euro track to keep it all snow, but given the over-amping trends I'm not confident. My hope is that there is still some mishandling of the vorticity off New Jersey, and that little blip of 2nd further east low on NAM at hr 33 is a hint of ticking back east, but I'm not confident. 12z RGEM will be big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sankaty Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Anyone have a good link for the parallel NAM? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.