Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,041
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

October 2026 general discussion


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/4/2026 at 12:15 PM, mreaves said:

Looks like MPV got down to 32°. Unfortunately my PWS is down so I don’t know what I got down to here. :( As for foliage, I think this weekend was probably peak. 

Finally got my PWS back up.  Had to reset the wifi connection and the console itself.  It's 51.2°.  Unfortunately it lost the rain stats.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Must've beeen distracted ... because the speed in which I've just realized we're moving through the solar transition season is something else.  It just occurred to me we are closer to the solar minimum now, than the max, along that timeline journey.  

It seems to happen faster every year. Hopefully the upcoming El Niño will offset some of the gloominess until the pendulum swings the other way by providing us with multiple day rain events and subsequent periods of frozen mud shortly thereafter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CCHurricane said:

The Notch did not disappoint yesterday.

No issues on Kinsman Ridge Trail, very little traffic on trail. Not crowded at all and plenty of parking. 

Can’t speak to the chaos over at Artist Bluff…

IMG_7924.jpeg

IMG_7886.jpeg

IMG_7877.jpeg

IMG_7941.jpeg

Yes.  Hiking and skiing on weekends are for the birds.  I plan on doing neither for the balance of what ever time I have left on this planet. 

  • Confused 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any hikers or mountain enthusiasts in here willing to chime in on the accuracy of Mountain-Forecast.com for summit conditions or other resources.  Some of my nephews are looking into hiking Mt Lafayette in the Whites very early on Saturday morning. They're even talking about trying to summit for sunrise.  They're young, healthy, solid hikers but they haven't done winter hikes and I'm  making sure they are informed and prepared and honestly trying to talk them out of it. I even texted their mother and told her it's not advisable.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Great Snow 1717 said:

You are correct regarding snow measurements. Back in the day the measurements were often taken after a storm had ended. I'll go to my grave stating the snowfall totals for the Merrimack Valley area for the Blizzard of 78 were on the low side..

40"+ was common N&W of BOS for 78.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

That is true, but you are proving my point that the same issue concerning measuring inconsistencies plagued Miller B events, as well.

One could say that Miller A having higher LEQ and lower snow ratios due to their warmer nature, they likely have more underestimation due to compaction.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Cyclone-68 said:

FWIW absolutely nothing I’m sure but WCVB mentioned that disturbed area in the Gulf might factor into our forecast when/if it emerges off of Florida next week 

Posted this on the Tropical Forum, but will do so here b/c this could some "fun ' games" as to what is what when it comes to a TC or not!

-----

Something doesn't seem right.  I was surprised the 18z ECWMF suddenly went the GFS route.

The 700-300 mb RH fields and PWAT anoms tell the story. I attached 18z ECMWF 72, 105, and 114 hr 700-300 RH.

Even when it is still the Bay of Campeche, it is "halved" from a strong moisture gradient, and it just gets stronger w/ time. looking like a typical ET low development.  And look at the 114 hr fcst PWAT anomaly.  That clearly shows a frontal structure, and compare the PWAT anomalies to Simon in the EPAC.  That's not nearly the anomaly you'd see in a typical TC.

I can see NHC "playing games" here.  Calling it something that it is not b/c of non-meteorological factors (social media nonsense, its sensible wx impact, etc).  But ET low can and do form in the Gulf in Oct (see the 1992 case I posted about earlier) and given the strength of El Nino, it makes ET lows this early even more likely.  In fact, by 36 hr, the 250 mb STJ become quite apparent near the Gulf Coast, and in 5 days close to landfall, a strong 250 s/w is present in the region, obviously aiding in the system's development.

Some might go, "but the simulated IR from the GFS shows an eye!"  Well, it is the GFS, and yes, initially it could be a TS/STS but here lies another issue, transition to a PT/ET low when it is approaching a landfall.  Sandy anyone?  You see the problem here.  But I say, in the end, it is what it is, and call it as such.  Don't let external pressures and nonsense contaminate the met science!
 

ecm1.png

ecm2.png

ecm3.png

ecm4.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

One could say that Miller A having higher LEQ and lower snow ratios due to their warmer nature, they likely have more underestimation due to compaction.

I think you're splitting hairs and reaching.................first of all, I don't think that any degree of difference with respect to LE and measuring technique would negate the evolutionary advantages that Miller B type cyclogenesis has. Secondly, couple said evolutionary differences with that that Miller B also tend to be less progressive, and that negates any LEQ advantage and increased proclivity for compression that Miller A had. 

Would like to go through the list of Miller B captures and Miller A captures (good luck)?

So, we are talking about less progressive systems on average, which protracts precp and augments measuring inconsistencies due to companion,  that also tend to have the timing of approach more closely align with max rate of depending of mid level centers.

Mic drop-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said:

Winds blasting the tin roof with acorns tonight

Also friendly reminder clocks roll back an hour on Halloween so we get the models an hour earlier

Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk
 

And "one more hour of cooling so it can snow easier!"  You actually see this nonsense posted.  Some are trolling but some actually believe it.  I see the same thing for svr wx.  Extra hour of heating after late March in the Plains!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

And "one more hour of cooling so it can snow easier!"  You actually see this nonsense posted.  Some are trolling but some actually believe it.  I see the same thing for svr wx.  Extra hour of heating after late March in the Plains!

Well if you hate that…you’ll absolutely loathe this :lol: 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...