dendrite Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 2 minutes ago, wxeyeNH said: Hey guys. So these are the days that we wait for, sometimes for years. Good luck down there. I really have not been paying to much attention as it has comfortably looked like a miss or scrape up here. Now I'm taking more interest. I guess my question would be, looking at the current runs would the defomation band get far enough NW to get me and Brian into the action? Usually in deep low's the White Mountains to my northeast shadow me. I'll be lurking and watching. Oh, 7" powder last night 24F light snow now Can’t rule some bands out. NAM is slowly weakening on approach (mslp rising) so the banding may spread out a bit as the stacked lows open a bit. It’ll be a nowcast deal. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Get that sucker north even 75 miles snd ill crack s smile 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: You start out living in S Wey.. when it’s over your’re in Wey? I might be at Brett’s house when it’s over. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Still some lighter snows to go over eastern areas but ho-Lee-shit 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, CoastalWx said: I might be at Brett’s house when it’s over. He may propose to Alison. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry's Weather Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 CNE peeps are silently worried due to this run. For canonical status I think we want this H5 closure to be 50-75 miles further north. Don’t really want the stall to be east of Cape May. LI stalls are preferred. A few ways to get this - stronger omega blocking, further north 50/50 low… my expertise runs out here 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Without question a NUKE. Widespread 2ft. Homogeneous amounts across the board. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Who will get 4 feet?!? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 there may be a bit of a CT Valley screw zone and unfortunately I would be in that spot. Down into CT it may not be as terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Damage In Tolland said: Who will get 4 feet?!? I think someone could certainly see 3' 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 3k 10:1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tiger_deF Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Oh yeah 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 RAP was joining the party Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wx2fish Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 10 minutes ago, dendrite said: Can’t rule some bands out. NAM is slowly weakening on approach (mslp rising) so the banding may spread out a bit as the stacked lows open a bit. It’ll be a nowcast deal. Yeah it shoots the mid level lift pretty far north eventually. Most stationary deffy (on this run) is probably back in NY where it pivots 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJonesWX Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 16 minutes ago, dendrite said: Still going to need more latitude with this for most of NH and the CRV (outside of CT) I think. Buzzkill. but you’re right, we need this to gain another 50-75 miles of latitude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 I’m issuing Blizzicaine warnings 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 44 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: NAM going nuclear...holy shit. it's happening Don't forget ... NW bias (... it's always awesome to find a mouse pellet in your raisin toast, huh ) hahahaha. yeah, no... in this situation, like I just wrote about a minute ago, I feel the N-W solutions have some merit. That's really what it comes down to; the NAM does ongoing support a N-W bias at this time range, but some situations ...that's an advantage - or can be. Case in point, Dec 2005. Granted there's been some pretty significant model improvements in the last 20 year ( haha), but back in the day ...the globals were all SE of the NAM, even the day before that event. I recall writing a pretty spot on disco as to why the ETA model was likelier to be ( exceptionally) correct. It had to do with identify the surface to 800 mb frontal position, along which there was extraordinarily dense thermal packing, making said frontal slope very upright. This is an environment feebdack that the resolution of the globals of the day... mm probably missed? But when mid level jet first nosed over that boundary, it was instant bombogen where the UVM was hyper focus and was tapping the improving diffluence as the jet continue to advance. Set off a host of other feedbacks...it grew so intense there was a tropopausal fold event...and the underside stinger brought 100 mph wind gusts that no one knew were coming. I didn't even see that... what an amazing thing that was. wow. Anyway, that's all a fast sloppy write sojourn ... In this situation, all the globals as I wrote earlier seem to be biased ( more or less) SE of the best q-g forcing. This really seems like a situation where the initial low trigger should be closer to the Del Marva stinger, and then hug bit closer where the 500 mb diffluence jet velocity is stronger... then, that parlays, because the storm then captures farther west ...if only 50 miles makes all the difference in some case. When the two collocate, that proficiency than means even stall possibilities ...all of which would be NW of the 54 hour positions offered up by the global runs overnight. christ ..i have stop writing so much... maybe i just grab all these and dump them into a weather diary novel. that's idea lol 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 17 minutes ago, dendrite said: Still going to need more latitude with this for most of NH and the CRV (outside of CT) I think. Yeah that move due east off the Delmarva vs. a more northeasterly track south of LI isn't ideal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: there may be a bit of a CT Valley screw zone and unfortunately I would be in that spot. Down into CT it may not be as terrible. Definitely some concerns here. Don’t think it’ll be as pronounced as the BOX map though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said: Don't forget ... NW bias (... it's always awesome to find a mouse pellet in your raisin toast, huh ) hahahaha. yeah, no... in this situation, like I just wrote about a minute ago, I feel the N-W solutions have some merit. That's really what it comes down two; the NAM does ongoing support a N-W bias at this time range, which is valid in certain situation. Case in point, Dec 2005. Granted there's been some pretty significant model improvements in the last 20 year ( haha), but back in the day ...the globals were all SE of the NAM, even the day before that event. I recall writing a pretty spot on disco as to why the ETA model was likelier to be ( exceptionally) correct. It had to do with identify the surface to 800 mb frontal position, along which there was extraordinary thermal packing, making said frontal slope very upright. This is an environment feebdack that the resolution of the globals of the day... mm probably missed? But when mid level jet first nosed over that boundary, it was instant bombogen where the UVM was hyper focus and was tapping the improving diffluence as the jet continue to advance. Set off a host of other feedbacks...it grew so intense there was a tropopausal fold event...and the underside stinger brought 100 mph wind gusts that no one new was coming. I didn't even see that... what an amazing thing that was. wow. Anyway, that's all a fast sloppy write sojourn ... In this situation, all the globals as I wrote earlier seem to be biased ( more or less) SE of the best q-g forcing. This really seems like a situation where the initial low trigger should be closer to the Del Marva stinger, and then hug bit closer where the 500 mb diffluence jet velocity is stronger... then, that parlays, because the storm then captures farther west ...if only 50 miles makes all the difference in some case. When the to collocate, that proficiency than means even stall possibilities ...all of which would be NW of the 54 hour positions offered up by the global runs overnight. christ ..i have stop writing so much... maybe i just grab all these and dump them into a weather diary novel. that's idea lol You've been very spot on in all your analysis and assessments and with projected trends. Excellent stuff as always Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowderBeard Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 5 minutes ago, dendrite said: 3k 10:1 Avy warnings for Blue Hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 2 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: I’m issuing Blizzicaine warnings ok Kev Moredamage 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathergoat Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Any mixing issues SE Connecticut/Southern RI? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 I mean…come on 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, weathergoat said: Any mixing issues SE Connecticut/Southern RI? No. As much as some want it to happen 2 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 kinda surprised ALY has yet to issue a warning for at least southern Litchfield cty... looking very likely 12-20 across the state, Blizzard warning and WSW already up from Upton to BOX... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCORH4L Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 3 minutes ago, weathergoat said: Any mixing issues SE Connecticut/Southern RI? Let's hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 One thing that might limit it as far as comparing to all time greats like 1978, 1888 is the duration. It’s not a fast mover but it doesn’t appear to stall or do a loop. That being said, super high impact. Power outages will be an issue for many Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 2 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said: I mean…come on that is quite sexy right there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 27 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Cane gusts back to Albany ! D-drip O.D. here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now