Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,599
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Is we back? February discussion thread


mahk_webstah
 Share

Recommended Posts

Great signals for last half of February on guidance across the board including ensembles and AI

This winter has a sneaky epic vibe 

I'll be out of town with the kids for school vacation week next week... perfect timing not to miss the potential ahead

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

Great signals for last half of February on guidance across the board including ensembles and AI

This winter has a sneaky epic vibe 

I'll be out of town with the kids for school vacation week next week... perfect timing not to miss the potential ahead

Yup same here. Be back Saturday the 21st. Might miss Friday the 20th, but after that looks good. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, the extreme cold is done....March 2018 wasn't that cold.

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, the extreme cold is done....March 2018 wasn't that cold.

 

 

Disagree.  Extensive snow cover, displaced PV spins off PTV at any time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Thankfully it’s on its way to the glue factory so we disregard until it gets put back together. 

Any OP solution that far out is for the glue factory. Ensembles do show some weak signal for a warm spell around that time, but ensembles this winter have been almost perpetually showing warm spells in clown range that haven't really verified....so we wait. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

This week coming up definitely looks cooler here vs how it looked a week ago, but literally 200 miles SW of us may be tanning. It’s real close. 

yeah ...there's a tendency for the models to act like there's a -NAO block when the actuals don't really show a block. It's really interesting.   But pinning the p-boundary roughly DTX to BOS is part of that behavior

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dendrite said:

Ha yeah. It’s been all downhill from there. It’s going to take a lot to get back up to the 43” depth I had…there was a ton of water in that pack to support it. Around 20” right now and there’s still room to compact.

We had 43" depth on Feb 29, 2008 with 10-14" forecast ("Manitoba Mauler") for March 1; I figured 50+ was in the bag.  Got only 6" which pushed the pack to 48", tops for that season, and there was still 35" on 3/31.  Somewhere (not in the spreadsheet) I have a core measurement from March 2008, probably 13-14" as we totaled 142.3" and most of the snow had meat.  DJFM precip totaled 22" and we had no extended thaws, just the one-day torch on Jan 8.

Took a core earlier this afternoon, 20" pack held 3.86".  We probably had about 2" SWE in year end's 8" pack and we've had 2.59" since then (includes 0.54" from 2 modest Jan RA).   Factor in some sublimation and almost 4" seems appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...