Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,470
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 regional war/obs/disco thread


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

@qg_omegaHave you been keeping track of this?

Flip back to RNA started out at 1/15 as of the 1/2run, now it's 1/20 and sliding....

AVvXsEhB4IvSjbnA7Zfm_SoHk4fjgh5sHCe98Ucu

I think it still eventually goes but I had said a week ago the +PNA was likely going to hold longer than ensembles showed.  They've just been bad past about D8-10 this winter but reasonably good with the pattern ideas up til D10.  I think the EPS at D16 may be showing signs of a breakdown coming soon after that.  The evolution back to the -PNA may not be the typical shift west of the EPO/PNA ridge but may be the Pac jet smashing it down and then the -PNA evolving after that.  If you loop the EPS from D14-16 it appear maybe if ran out to D20 that would be what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said:

I think it still eventually goes but I had said a week ago the +PNA was likely going to hold longer than ensembles showed.  They've just been bad past about D8-10 this winter but reasonably good with the pattern ideas up til D10.  I think the EPS at D16 may be showing signs of a breakdown coming soon after that.  The evolution back to the -PNA may not be the typical shift west of the EPO/PNA ridge but may be the Pac jet smashing it down and then the -PNA evolving after that.  If you loop the EPS from D14-16 it appear maybe if ran out to D20 that would be what happens.

Oh yes...February will definitely be RNA and probably March, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I buy it...I know someone like @qg_omegawill beat me over the head for that, but this season is going to eventually produce....I don't think I'm going to challenge my futility record.

It's kind of wild that just taking a random loop of the 06z GFS, we have like 3-4 distinct shortwaves over the next 10 days that dive into the eastern US and none of them can produce any meaningful QPF. Hopefully that changes, but this is quickly turning into a very dry winter if we can't get these things to produce anything. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I haven't viewed one of that bafoon's videos in over a year....I realized quickly what he was. The WORST out there, and there are some bad ones.

Alot of hypersters that call themselves meteorologists on youtube.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said:

This could be huge, all

Screenshot_20260112-091819.thumb.png.ac30bee5b045f96c074967e71ac7c272.png

Honestly and truly, this guy is a complete joke. His whole premise was always to blow things into the stratosphere. All of his words consist of " HUGE, ARCTIC OUTBREAKS, BLIZZARDS, ". I'm not saying this guy is impassionate, but man, he is definitely one of those people on social media that cause a frenzy to most people who have no idea what's going on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, moneypitmike said:

Last night’s surprise 2.5  is 250x what ill get on the 15/16.

 

 

IMG_6274.jpeg

Nice!  We had some mood flakes while driving home from Farmington last evening.  Snow squalls are admittingly hit or miss, but we get the miss at a high percentage, except when we lived in Fort Kent where they were common.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I haven't viewed one of that bafoon's videos in over a year....I realized quickly what he was. The WORST out there, and there are some bad ones.

NE weenie alert is all in on 360hr 2m temps

IMG_5301.jpeg

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dendrite said:

NE weenie alert is all in on 360hr 2m temps

IMG_5301.jpeg

Sure and if that verified then MSP would see its:

First -20 temp since Jan 2019*
First -30 temp since Feb 1996**
First -35 temp since Jan 1888***

Lock it in.

* At almost 7 years since -20, it's the longest >-20° there; previous 5-year streaks ending 1961, 2004, 2009, 2014
** 30 years is by far the longest such run for -30°, three others at 19 years ending 1935, 1962, 1996
*** -41° in 1888 is the record and the most recent <-35° of four occurrences. -34 did occur in 1934 and 1970.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ariof said:

Sure and if that verified then MSP would see its:

First -20 temp since Jan 2019*
First -30 temp since Feb 1996**
First -35 temp since Jan 1888***

Lock it in.

* At almost 7 years since -20, it's the longest >-20° there; previous 5-year streaks ending 1961, 2004, 2009, 2014
** 30 years is by far the longest such run for -30°, three others at 19 years ending 1935, 1962, 1996
*** -41° in 1888 is the record and the most recent <-35° of four occurrences. -34 did occur in 1934 and 1970.

My ex lived in MN during the 96 shot and had one of these shirts

IMG_7702.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mid- and long-range continues to look really active for the north country with this clipper parade. And a lot of these events have better than typical dynamics. I can remember plenty of early Januarys that were dry frozen tundras up in the Dacks. Not this year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

On 1/9/2026 at 11:39 AM, brooklynwx99 said:

I like the second wave more, as is often the case... it doesn't have anything clawing at its back and the antecedent airmass is more favorable. that doesn't preclude the 16th, but if I were a betting man, I would put my money on the 18th

like one of these is way more typically productive than the other

  

On 1/9/2026 at 12:30 PM, eduggs said:

The 0z ECM at 168hr looks remarkable similar to 246hr. It easy to say now that we prefer the later threat, but when that threat gets nearer it might not look any better.

1896871732_ECM168.thumb.png.b77ce300dd193147d425078d2df3a781.png1336673631_ECM246.thumb.png.ba85374da9c76ddbf7e34dd7654a795d.png

 

On 1/9/2026 at 12:32 PM, brooklynwx99 said:

this is why we look at ensembles and not OP runs

 

On 1/9/2026 at 12:35 PM, eduggs said:

The point remains. The closer a threat, the clearer we can see its flaws. E.g, ensemble means blend and hide shortwave details that appear in closer ranges. Choosing the 2nd showcase because we don't like the look of the 1st isn't always correct. Jan 15 at one time had a very favorable "look" too.

 

This ECMWF chart below looks a lot like something "clawing at the back" of the east coast trof for the 18th. This perfectly illustrates my point about being cautious about preferring a later threat based on averaged ensemble height fields.

23739677_2026-01-12at13-23-06ModelsECMWFPivotalWeather.thumb.jpg.8e8fcadebb0d3d0a2e5deba1f167d878.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eduggs said:

  

  

 

 

 

This ECMWF chart below looks a lot like something "clawing at the back" of the east coast trof for the 18th. This perfectly illustrates my point about being cautious about preferring a later threat based on averaged ensemble height fields.

23739677_2026-01-12at13-23-06ModelsECMWFPivotalWeather.thumb.jpg.8e8fcadebb0d3d0a2e5deba1f167d878.jpg

why are you like this, dude

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ariof said:

Sure and if that verified then MSP would see its:

First -20 temp since Jan 2019*
First -30 temp since Feb 1996**
First -35 temp since Jan 1888***

Lock it in.

* At almost 7 years since -20, it's the longest >-20° there; previous 5-year streaks ending 1961, 2004, 2009, 2014
** 30 years is by far the longest such run for -30°, three others at 19 years ending 1935, 1962, 1996
*** -41° in 1888 is the record and the most recent <-35° of four occurrences. -34 did occur in 1934 and 1970.

Only one -35 or lower, Jan 16, 2009  Same day that Big Black River touched -50, to eclipse Van Buren's -48 for the state's coldest on record.
Six lows of -30 or colder, most recent Jan 27, 2022.
73 lows of -20 or colder, most recent on Feb 4, 2023.
2023-24 and 2024-25 marked the first time for consecutive winters w/o a -20, though last Feb had a -19.  Dec 9, 2025 got down to -18, earliest by 7 days to reach that cold.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eduggs said:

I made a perfectly legitimate point. Focus on that instead of me.

when you're forecasting past a week out, using ensembles and focusing on the broader pattern to point out timeframes of interest is generally the way to go. this will be taught in every forecasting classroom on the planet. now that we're a few days later on, we can see that there are two distinct waves rather than a single trough (which, by the way, some OP runs had)

this is the way long range forecasting is... the data change sometimes. it doesn't make the process any less valid

ezgif-41966246ce69a253.thumb.gif.2b06988aeec6f96bb2ae1006c0492fe3.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, dendrite said:

My ex lived in MN during the 96 shot and had one of these shirts

IMG_7702.jpeg

Oh yeah people there are real proud when it gets cold. And it gets colder with each telling. Duluth hit -39, Embarrass 56, Tower 60. Although people swear they hit -66 if you ask around.

Both Twin Cities newspapers had banner headlines that it reached -60 200 miles away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

when you're forecasting past a week out, using ensembles and focusing on the broader pattern to point out timeframes of interest is generally the way to go. this will be taught in every forecasting classroom on the planet. now that we're a few days later on, we can see that there are two distinct waves rather than a single trough (which, by the way, some OP runs had)

this is the way long range forecasting is... the data change sometimes. it doesn't make the process any less valid

 

See, we don't disagree. This was exactly the point I made 3 days ago that you dismissed. Long-range ensemble modeling hides critical shortwave details. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be used as a forecasting tool. But it does bias long-range "looks" positive because it smooths out wave spacing and interference issues.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...