Go Kart Mozart Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 50 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said: Possibly something @weatherwiz might be interested in. I just had this video show up on my YouTube feed. Not sure why. but a decent documentary on the 1995 Great Barrington MA tornado it just posted 5 days ago Worth watching IMHO I drove through Monterey a few days later. Amazing to see acres upon acres of trees snapped like matchsticks about 15' off the ground. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 48.7 this AM....all just a dream soon enough- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 14 hours ago Author Share Posted 14 hours ago The present satellite loop over the panhandle of TX looks and behaves remarkably similar to a TUTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago We microburst Public Information Statement National Weather Service Gray ME 411 PM EDT Tue Jul 22 2025 ...NWS Damage Survey for 07/20/25 Thunderstorm Wind Event... Severe thunderstorms developed ahead of a slow moving cold front Sunday. One storm developed west of the Lakes Region, strengthening as it approached Danbury and Franklin, NH. The storm collapsed near Sanbornton, producing a powerful wet microburst. Observed wind damage in some pockets was consistent with estimated wind speeds of 105 mph, resulting in over 500 downed trees in the area. .Wet Microburst Wind Damage... Peak Wind (estimated): 105 mph Path Length /statute/: 2 miles Path Width /maximum/: .5 miles Fatalities: 0 Injuries: 0 Start Date: 07/20/25 Start Time: 504pm EDT Start Location: Sanbornton, NH Start Lat/Lon: 43.5023 / -71.5852 End Date: 07/20/25 End Time: 510pm EDT End Location: Sanbornton, NH End Lat/Lon: 49.4910 / -71.5502 Significant tree damage was located in Sanbornton, NH that was consistent with a wet microburst. Numerous eye witnesses expressed that the strongest winds occurred with the heaviest downpour. Damage was variable in the downburst area with a general southeast fall direction to the trees being observed. There where two distinct pockets of damage that took hundreds of trees down, to include pine, oak and maple. Trees where both uprooted and snapped. In addition, hundreds of other trees where downed on the edges of the damage area, but damage was more sporadic in nature. Some structral damage did occur, but was mostly confined to sheds and shelter structures. A few vehicles were also damaged due to trees falling on them. Additional damage was likely further in the woods, but was not accessible for the damage survey. An estimated 500 trees were either snapped or blown down in the damage area. 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreaves Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 53 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: The present satellite loop over the panhandle of TX looks and behaves remarkably similar to a TUTT King Tutt? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunafish Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 13 minutes ago, dendrite said: We microburst Public Information Statement National Weather Service Gray ME 411 PM EDT Tue Jul 22 2025 ...NWS Damage Survey for 07/20/25 Thunderstorm Wind Event... Severe thunderstorms developed ahead of a slow moving cold front Sunday. One storm developed west of the Lakes Region, strengthening as it approached Danbury and Franklin, NH. The storm collapsed near Sanbornton, producing a powerful wet microburst. Observed wind damage in some pockets was consistent with estimated wind speeds of 105 mph, resulting in over 500 downed trees in the area. .Wet Microburst Wind Damage... Peak Wind (estimated): 105 mph Path Length /statute/: 2 miles Path Width /maximum/: .5 miles Fatalities: 0 Injuries: 0 Start Date: 07/20/25 Start Time: 504pm EDT Start Location: Sanbornton, NH Start Lat/Lon: 43.5023 / -71.5852 End Date: 07/20/25 End Time: 510pm EDT End Location: Sanbornton, NH End Lat/Lon: 49.4910 / -71.5502 Significant tree damage was located in Sanbornton, NH that was consistent with a wet microburst. Numerous eye witnesses expressed that the strongest winds occurred with the heaviest downpour. Damage was variable in the downburst area with a general southeast fall direction to the trees being observed. There where two distinct pockets of damage that took hundreds of trees down, to include pine, oak and maple. Trees where both uprooted and snapped. In addition, hundreds of other trees where downed on the edges of the damage area, but damage was more sporadic in nature. Some structral damage did occur, but was mostly confined to sheds and shelter structures. A few vehicles were also damaged due to trees falling on them. Additional damage was likely further in the woods, but was not accessible for the damage survey. An estimated 500 trees were either snapped or blown down in the damage area. Over 400 miles in 6 minutes. Impressive. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: 48.7 this AM....all just a dream soon enough- soon enough, hopefully three months of that Dec-Feb 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 13 hours ago Author Share Posted 13 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Torch Tiger said: soon enough, hopefully three months of that Dec-Feb nailed the temperature on Christmas morning with that 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 13 hours ago, kdxken said: Rayleigh scattering up the Ying Yang! Got to be a top fiverr. Best? Mie scattering in San Francisco Bay? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago As I remember from the first optics class I took, Rayleigh=1/Lambda to the 4th power while Mie=1/Lambda As Van Morrison implies… 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago 49.8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, ineedsnow said: 49.8 Get used to it. 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Moss is fading. We're getting there. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, kdxken said: Get used to it. Ya it's coming I thought it would of started earlier but looks to start soon.. we refresh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, HoarfrostHubb said: Possibly something @weatherwiz might be interested in. I just had this video show up on my YouTube feed. Not sure why. but a decent documentary on the 1995 Great Barrington MA tornado it just posted 5 days ago Worth watching IMHO I'll give this a watch tonight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, Go Kart Mozart said: As I understand the AI models, they do initialize with the same data as the physical models....radiosonde, satellite, etc. So they aren't completely "anti-physics". The AI models already seem to be ahead of the physical models in many respects, although in my entirely empirical observation, the physics models are still better within a few days. A blend is indicated now, but I agree, quantum computing will change everything. Didn't meant to imply they don't initialize with the same data but the backbone behind it all is the quality of the data being ingested, the amount of data, and then the physics/calculus operations being performed and if there are errors or poor performance on this, well AI or not, the modeled forecast is going to struggle. I really can't wait though for quantum computing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 20 minutes ago, wdrag said: No threads yet on the following: Fairly widespread SVR late Fri. Spot 5" totals 18z Fri-06z Mon, inclusive of several short duration FF events, primarily Sunday. This may include embedded iso svr. Last chance for 100F this year Newark-NYC seems like this Friday but above normal mean of 90+ occurrences at hand for KEWR as 90+ reoccurs Saturday and Tuesday July 29. Tuesday: nw flow svr event. August: seasonable variability again as per July with a cooler than normal first week, then seemingly wetter and warmer than normal last 3 weeks of Aug as the w Atlantic ridge builds in response to the strong 5H heat ridge near the Rockies, possibly edging west toward the end of the month. Support from 00z/22 GEFS qpf through 700+ hours as seen on Pivotal and spot check of ECMWF INT and the July 17 CPC 1 month outlook. This suggests to me probably no more 100 at KEWR but plenty of 90-95 after the first week of August. Will check in tomorrow Plenty of summer heat and dews to go for all heading into and thru Augdewst 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Friday is pretty interesting...I mean it sucks that H5 temps are only around -5C but dews 73-75 should help compensate for weak mlvl lapse rates but that is some pretty good shear with ~2000 MLCAPE. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, Go Kart Mozart said: I drove through Monterey a few days later. Amazing to see acres upon acres of trees snapped like matchsticks about 15' off the ground. It still give a salute when I drive through Sturbridge on 84 after 6/1/11. You can still see the scar in the tree growth on top of that hill to the west of the highway. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: Friday is pretty interesting...I mean it sucks that H5 temps are only around -5C but dews 73-75 should help compensate for weak mlvl lapse rates but that is some pretty good shear with ~2000 MLCAPE. Threat looks north with the later timing? Maybe west towards CT in the late pm/early night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Torch Tiger said: Threat looks north with the later timing? Maybe west towards CT in the late pm/early night I wouldn't be surprised if we see a similar scenario to the other day occur. I think we can maintain stuff into the mid-evening and probably to the coast. Decent shortwave and forcing with modest height falls. I could see a scenario where storms are maintained by developing cold pools. Looks good for a few microbursts 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 5 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: It still give a salute when I drive through Sturbridge on 84 after 6/1/11. You can still see the scar in the tree growth on top of that hill to the west of the highway. I drive 20 west a lot and still see where the path was in Brimfield and Holland. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Hang on to the summer you have before we enter the 8 month autumn period 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 72° / 59° still okay but I was spoiled by yesterday. You can feel the difference while you're working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sey-Mour Snow Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 12 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said: Hang on to the summer you have before we enter the 8 month autumn period It's really like 2-3 months of fall, 2-3 months of summer, 1 month of winter and 5-7 months of early spring.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthCoastMA Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said: It's really like 2-3 months of fall, 2-3 months of summer, 1 month of winter and 5-7 months of early spring.. Fair enough, I was being hyperbolic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 22 minutes ago, kdxken said: 72° / 59° still okay but I was spoiled by yesterday. You can feel the difference while you're working. Its creeping up slowly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MegaMike Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 18 hours ago, weatherwiz said: I saw this the other day. While I am extremely skeptical with the AI stuff and the movement with AI within the field, this is something I think is worst investing resources in regarding AI...short-term/nowcasting, not medium-range. I think there is tremendous potential in this regard when it comes to improving lead times with severe weather and flash flooding. Glad you threw in there the caveat too...that is something that should definitely be made aware and realized by everyone reading the study. But I am excited for this. Logically, it doesn't make sense to me: Let's bring in data scientists to create a stand alone, meteorological modeling system lol. I'm sure it'll get better (build dat' training dataset), but for now, I'd say they're 1-2 decades away from making anything comparable to traditional NWP. I still think using AI to bias correct ic/bcs is the way to go. I know that has merit. Yea, it's a bit misleading... They used HRRR analysis as ground truth to make the conclusion that 'HRRR-Cast is comparable to HRRR...' I'd still rather see evaluations/comparisons at METAR/radiosonde sites. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now