dryslot Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Euro says meh, Better chance at getting more in a squall this afternoon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 24 minutes ago, weathafella said: Euro today says 1-3/2-4. This may be a rare scenario ( when speaking in terms of model performance/history <-- relative to...) that the Euro corrects toward the less conventional/trusted model sources. In fact, ...so rare, I wonder if that's ever really happened where a GGEM/RGEM/ICON blend successfully coup'ed That said ... after 3 consecutive cycles the GGEM had ticked more impacting... as of 12z, arrived looking more RGEM like than ever. It gets hard to knock such strident continuity; now < 60 hours, when said trend of the Can cluster has been there since late middle range. -when then also introducing the philosophical aspect I outlined regarding the explosive baroclinic boundary condition laid into place between ~ ATL to just SE of Cape Cod by this arctic boundary/air mass that slows down and stall along that axis... I think there is too much argument in favor of these guidance from both an operational technique, to concept Meteorology, to dispose these solutions in lieu of a Euro paltriness that has in fact been 'trying to avoid admitting it's wrong by hedging the event in silent intervals' I mean I'm not sure of any of this... sort of tongue in cheek. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 4 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: This may be a rare scenario ( when speaking in terms of model performance/history <-- relative to...) that the Euro corrects toward the less conventional/trusted model sources. In fact, ...so rare, I wonder if that's ever really happened where a GGEM/RGEM/ICON blend successfully coup'ed That said ... after 3 consecutive cycles the GGEM had ticked more impacting... as of 12z, arrived looking more RGEM like than ever. It's gets hard to knock such strident continuity < 60 hours, when said trend of the Can cluster has been there since late middle range. -when then also introducing the philosophical aspect I outlined regarding the explosive baroclinic boundary condition laid into place between ~ ATL to just SE of Cape Cod by this arctic boundary/air mass that slows down and stall along that axis... I think there is too much argument in favor of these guidance from both an operational technique, to concept Meteorology, to dispose these solutions in lieu of a Euro paltriness that has in fact been 'trying to admit it's wrong without looking like it's modeling the event any differently' Sooo…another words, the Canadian and the RGEM are gonna be more right with the heavier look you think. As the Euro plays catch up. Is that what you’re meaning? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 13 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said: Euro says 1-2” S of route 2 . Maybe 2.5 for Garth and Cape unless a 1005 Mb low is producing magic at “mid levels “ Yeah, more than 2” will be tough on that look. C-1 most places, maybe 2” spot on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Sooo…another words, the Canadian and the RGEM are gonna be more right with the heavier look you think. As the Euro plays catch up. Is that what you’re meaning? Yes this is such an easy forecast 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Just now, Damage In Tolland said: Yes this is such an easy forecast Sorry man, but I think your forecast for what you're expecting is wrong. If it's not, I'll eat crow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Yes this is such an easy forecast Lol, well I’m thinking 2-3” here is a safe bet for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 26 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Sooo…another words, the Canadian and the RGEM are gonna be more right with the heavier look you think. As the Euro plays catch up. Is that what you’re meaning? not saying either way ... just pointing out some aspects I'm noticing - Extending that it's hard to automatically assume the lesser popular/known guidance types will be typically wrong in this seemingly rare case. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: not saying either way ... just point out some aspects I'm noticing - Oh ok. But sounded to me like you were hedging towards the Canadians, when you said hard to ignore the 60 hr consistency idea…but I guess I misunderstood. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STILL N OF PIKE Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 19 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Oh ok. But sounded to me like you were hedging towards the Canadians, when you said hard to ignore the 60 hr consistency idea…but I guess I misunderstood. Seems to me If anyone reads his post , he definitely is commenting on why those may score a “coup “ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 minute ago, STILL N OF PIKE said: Seems to me If you read his post , he definitely is commenting on why those may score a “coup “ Yes, Exactly my point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJonesWX Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, powderfreak said: Only one exclamation point though, needs two or three. Post of the year!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, dryslot said: Euro says meh, Better chance at getting more in a squall this afternoon. I hope not, I only got .25” in the squall. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sey-Mour Snow Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 NAMs bring this in later tomorrow evening now wth 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Just now, Sey-Mour Snow said: NAMs bring this in later tomorrow evening now wth I think going with a 1"-3" amount for us is most likely. Anything more will be a welcomed surprise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderblizzard Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 minute ago, Sey-Mour Snow said: NAMs bring this in later tomorrow evening now wth Looks like it puts more focus on the initial stuff instead, less impressive later on compared to 12z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 4 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said: NAMs bring this in later tomorrow evening now wth These always come in early 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 The Canadian is a great model, it should not be discounted. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 31 minutes ago, George001 said: The Canadian is a great model, it should not be discounted. lol…. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Mesos vs Globals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleetussnow Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 43 minutes ago, George001 said: The Canadian is a great model, it should not be discounted. Mentioned also by Walt Drag in the NY Metro thread; he says trust it in these scenarios. Also some say it is number 2 in verification recently. DonaldSutherland might have said that in fact. I was surprised by these endorsements. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I don’t think the Canadian is a great model based on what I’ve seen for years. Can it score an event? Sure, but a great model it is not. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScituateWX Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: I don’t think the Canadian is a great model based on what I’ve seen for years. Can it score an event? Sure, but a great model it is not. I’m still shoveling the snow and rebuilding from all the hurricanes it has showed over SNE over the years 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 GFS still sucks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 BOX going 2-4” here. Maybe a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Its 1-3", 2-4"..been apparent for awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSnowBOS Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Broom to leaf blower snows incoming….. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PWMan Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 minute ago, JoeSnowBOS said: Broom to leaf blower snows incoming…. . Better than sump-pump rains and storm surge. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuddyWx Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Looking forward to a couple inches of snow and then some cold to keep it around.. just want the wintery feel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George001 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 45 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: I don’t think the Canadian is a great model based on what I’ve seen for years. Can it score an event? Sure, but a great model it is not. It has a higher verification score than the gfs 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now