Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,013
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

Augdewst 2026: Summer's Last Stand


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

**Not making a political statement**

It’s an executive order for an executive agency and afaik there’s no law preventing that kind of renaming so they are obligated to follow it.

A little more complicated, I think, for something like the Department of Defense, where federal law clearly requires a name change to be approved by Congress.
 

 

Name changes to locations happen more often than many think from all levels of govt and globally.  It is nothing new. 

Idlewild Airport in NYC was changed to J.F.K. in 1963.  Manchester Airport was changed to Manchester-Boston Regional Airport in 2006.

In 2023, Fort Bragg NC was changed to Fort Liberty and then back to Bragg in 2025.  Other military bases had this done in the previous administration and current. 

Mt McKinley was changed to Denali in 2015, and now is back to Mt McKinley.  Barrow AK was changed to Utqiaġvik in 2016.  Hot Springs NM changed to Truth or Consequences in 1950. 

There are many others examples in the country and worldwide  Leningrad changed to St Petersburg in 1991, Myanmar was Burma, Belize was British Honduras, Eswatini was Swaziland.

So anyone thinking name changes to locations are not allowed/llegal or unique to just the current administration or political reasons for changes did not occur during prior administrations is incorrect and may be displaying bias and/or selective outrage.

And the above is not a political statement, it is a factual statement.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

Name changes to locations happen more often than many think from all levels of govt and globally.  It is nothing new. 

Idlewild Airport in NYC was changed to J.F.K. in 1963.  Manchester Airport was changed to Manchester-Boston Regional Airport in 2006.

In 2023, Fort Bragg NC was changed to Fort Liberty and then back to Bragg in 2025.  Other military bases had this done in the previous administration and current. 

Mt McKinley was changed to Denali in 2015, and now is back to Mt McKinley.  Barrow AK was changed to Utqiaġvik in 2016.  Hot Springs NM changed to Truth or Consequences in 1950. 

There are many others examples in the country and worldwide  Leningrad changed to St Petersburg in 1991, Myanmar was Burma, Belize was British Honduras, Eswatini was Swaziland.

So anyone thinking name changes to locations are not allowed/llegal or unique to just the current administration or political reasons for changes did not occur during prior administrations is incorrect and may be displaying bias and/or selective outrage.

And the above is not a political statement, it is a factual statement.

And how often in this opus of factuality, does a major landmark get a name change due to the namer having erupted, yet again, into an epic hissy fit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hailstoned said:

And how often in this opus of factuality, does a major landmark get a name change due to the namer having erupted, yet again, into an epic hissy fit?

You are being specific as to why a given change occurs, when I was talking in only in general about how it is nothing new for name changes and how they are more common than many think.  Your statement is non-sequitur argument.

And your statement is selective outrage, as I noted in my initial post was likely occurring/occurred  Again, I was only talking in general and giving a bunch of historical examples about location name changes and how many administrations have done it...factual.

The implied deriding statement "opus of factuality" is an ad hominem attack/poisoning the well statement.

I suggest you avoid committing logical fallacies in your statements if you want to have a reasonable discussion.  I said my post was not political, and you turned it into one.  I stuck w/ facts..
 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

**Not making a political statement**

It’s an executive order for an executive agency and afaik there’s no law preventing that kind of renaming so they are obligated to follow it.

A little more complicated, I think, for something like the Department of Defense, where federal law clearly requires a name change to be approved by Congress.
 

 

@WxWatcher007 post here is reasonable and states facts.
 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Ginx snewx said:

 

Screenshot_20260827_121654_Chrome.jpg

So what would explain why our delivery charges are accounting for more than 3/4 of the bill despite usage rates remaining the same or even dropping in the last few years? Something ain’t right here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dendrite said:

We’re comparing airport name changes to changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico/Lake Ontario to America?

are you surprised ?  people don't like admitting they were wrong and others were right - we see that on here all the time after some forecasts verify, and others don't

70/69 with fog here, fall morning fog season has arrived 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, vortex95 said:

Again, I was only talking in general and giving a bunch of historical examples about location name changes and how many administrations have done it...factual.

Would you agree that changing the name of Manchester Regional Airport or Hot Springs, New Mexico may be in a different class than major international bodies of water?

Just speaking in terms of factual size/scope.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't shock me if ensuing administration applies referendums, if not immediately repeals when and where legislative rules allow, many of the changes that have been making headlines during this ... quirk of history BS that seems like an infinitely long 4 years in an asylum run by inmates

  • Like 3
  • Weenie 1
  • Disagree 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Hailstoned said:

And how often in this opus of factuality, does a major landmark get a name change due to the namer having erupted, yet again, into an epic hissy fit?

Tappan Zee bridge changed to Governor Mario Cuomo Bridge.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, vortex95 said:

You are being specific as to why a given change occurs, when I was talking in only in general about how it is nothing new for name changes and how they are more common than many think.  Your statement is non-sequitur argument.

And your statement is selective outrage, as I noted in my initial post was likely occurring/occurred  Again, I was only talking in general and giving a bunch of historical examples about location name changes and how many administrations have done it...factual.

The implied deriding statement "opus of factuality" is an ad hominem attack/poisoning the well statement.

I suggest you avoid committing logical fallacies in your statements if you want to have a reasonable discussion.  I said my post was not political, and you turned it into one.  I stuck w/ facts..
 

Lol.  Defending a political decision by accusing someone of being political.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...