Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,649
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

“Cory’s in NYC! Let’s HECS!” Feb. 22-24 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, MuddyWx said:

Heaviest stuff looks like it rolls in this area at 5-6am.. alarm will be set early

Yep…5-8am…maybe as early as 4am for far SE MA…is when the convective stuff rips into eastern MA. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

3k still has a good fronto signal way back in western CT. 

I know its the RGEM, but man that thing has been stubborn....I know I can worry a bit, but there are definitely some red flags for the big numbers out this way, been there, done that situation for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

There's some normalization going on in the NAM back east, too.   It's subtle, but ex, Login was 53 kts in the middle BL sustained wind fields yesterday, and now it is only 41 in the FOUS grid.    The QPF is down a bit too.   It's also down in PHL and NYC compared to what it was yesterday.   

I suspect yesterday's cinemas were the max d-drippers for this storm's modeling movie, and now we're just going to end up with a major and not much more overall.  Fine. 

I say this ...not just because of the NAM, but there's a 10 ... 12% amplitude theft going on across the board as we've entered these late modeling innings. 

(note, I'm not incorporating the HRRR or the like).   

Now-cast could perhaps bring the theft back, ... but, since that behavior has been noted over recent years worth of modeling ( actually), it's sort of built in confidence/expectation to take place.    As an aside, it seems what we haven't seen is a modeled system that started out meager and grew 8% per run until go time.  It seems like technology favors going the other way, either by error or design... We're always giving back in the closing arguments.    

 

Not a trolling inquiry, but do you now think this is (just) a major event and a high end occurrence?  Do you think snow totals should be cutback region wide, along with dropping wind gust levels? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SJonesWX said:

he is ATATT. All troll all the time.

he is definitely trying too hard, again.

I have said it before, but I don’t know why the entire forum doesn’t have him on ignore. his next genuine post will be his first.

He will pepper in an occasional legit post to throw us off though, lol

  • Like 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Spanks45 said:

I know its the RGEM, but man that thing has been stubborn....I know I can worry a bit, but there are definitely some red flags for the big numbers out this way, been there, done that situation for sure

ha…how did it manage to go more se?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

Icon looked good here and Rgem still scoffs 

RGEM has consistently had that coastal locked enhancement right along EPYM county..it basically just hugs the shore. I havent seen that in other mesos. Either way, weird how that model has been steadfast in its eastern lean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SouthCoastMA said:

RGEM has consistently had that coastal locked enhancement right along EPYM county..it basically just hugs the shore. I havent seen that in other mesos. Either way, weird how that model has been steadfast in its eastern lean

The cmc has had it too might be Canadian thing

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MuddyWx said:

Will you be measuring throughout? I want to see some verification of those crazy rates

Yeah, going to be tricky with the drifting but I’m going to clear the deck every few hours, going to take measurements when I do so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FXWX said:

Not a trolling inquiry, but do you now think this is (just) a major event and a high end occurrence?  Do you think snow totals should be cutback region wide, along with dropping wind gust levels? 

I'd like another model cycle.   I'd say if the 18z's roll in with another of this seeming attempt to get a reduction by our noses, we might consider limiting this to major headlines. 

Also ...  the difference between a "major" event and something say, top 5/history and so forth, isn't likely to register much differently in the high 90s percentile population.  Just being a member of the species and modern culture ( lol ), but intuitively the individual would see 1/8th mi vis and snow 3/4 the way up their SUV's tire wells, and figure for a well handled event.  perhaps the distinction is more for us in that sense. 

This storm is idiosyncratically compact, and if it bumps 50 mi E, we're just going to have to consider that when it comes to snowfall distribution.  Now-cast workout...  SE Mass could take a particular pummeling, even in a shaded total system profile. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...