bluewave Posted yesterday at 07:11 AM Share Posted yesterday at 07:11 AM 16 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: I don't think so, we are still "evening out" a 27-year period of more than 50% La Nina's (RONI). And the subsurface in the west is not as cold as 1997 was at this time. You seem to think we are overdue for a Strong La Nina but I think +ENSO is the tendency going forward as it's more about the cumulative, so if a Moderate Nina is the average follow up of a Super Nino, I think it will only be a Weak Nina. We'll see. Yeah, the La Ninas have been getting weaker following super El Niños since the early 1970s. This past La Niña was the weakest on record following the 2023-2024 super El Niño. Also the first time that Nino 1+2 didn’t fully cool off between super El Niño events. This lead to the more Nino-like December 2024 with the record +PNA. While the STJ and Nino 1+2 warming were relatively weak vs the Northern Stream, the Gulf Coast got an historic snowstorm in January 2025. Super El Niño ONI and the lowest ONI in the years following NDJ 72…..+2.1 NDJ 73……-2.0 NDJ 82…….+2.2 NDJ 84…….-1.1 NDJ 97…..+2.4 NDJ 99…..-1.7 NDJ 15……+2.8 NDJ 17…..-0.9 NDJ 23…..+2.1 NDJ 25…..-0.5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted yesterday at 07:33 AM Share Posted yesterday at 07:33 AM Yeah, the La Ninas have been getting weaker following super El Niños since the early 1970s. This past La Niña was the weakest on record following the 2023-2024 super El Niño. Also the first time that Nino 1+2 didn’t fully cool off between super El Niño events. This lead to the more Nino-like December 2024 with the record +PNA. While the STJ and Nino 1+2 warming were relatively weak vs the Northern Stream, the Gulf Coast got an historic snowstorm in January 2025. Super El Niño ONI and the lowest ONI in the years following NDJ 72…..+2.1 NDJ 73……-2.0 NDJ 82…….+2.2 NDJ 84…….-1.1 NDJ 97…..+2.4 NDJ 99…..-1.7 NDJ 15……+2.8 NDJ 17…..-0.9 NDJ 23…..+2.1 NDJ 25…..-0.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted yesterday at 08:27 AM Share Posted yesterday at 08:27 AM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted yesterday at 08:41 AM Share Posted yesterday at 08:41 AM The latest CFSv2 release has actually cooled ~0.15 to 0.20 vs that from the start of June for the periods starting with JJA: June 1st release: relative peak ~+3.0 (OND) and rapid cooling to ~+2.25 DJF Today’s release: relative peak ~+2.8 (OND) and rapid cooling to ~+2.1 DJF 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted yesterday at 08:47 AM Share Posted yesterday at 08:47 AM 3 minutes ago, GaWx said: The latest CFSv2 release has actually cooled ~0.15 to 0.20 vs that from the start of June for the periods starting with JJA: June 1st release: peak ~+3.0 (OND) Today’s release: peak ~+2.8 (OND) From someone who has, for better or worse, followed the Cfs2 forecast follies over the years, the bias corrected SSTA plumes have almost always been more accurate, whether warmer or cooler. Fwiw 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted yesterday at 09:12 AM Share Posted yesterday at 09:12 AM 1 hour ago, GaWx said: The latest CFSv2 release has actually cooled ~0.15 to 0.20 vs that from the start of June for the periods starting with JJA: June 1st release: relative peak ~+3.0 (OND) and rapid cooling to ~+2.25 DJF Today’s release: relative peak ~+2.8 (OND) and rapid cooling to ~+2.1 DJF @forkyfork I wonder what the models will show once this current WWB and the new DWKW that has formed does their “dirty work”? There is some major strengthening and warming about to come And once the +IOD gets going, it’s going to constructively interfere with the El Nino/Bjerknes feedback 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FPizz Posted yesterday at 01:20 PM Share Posted yesterday at 01:20 PM 4 hours ago, snowman19 said: If you read the comments from the original poster of the video, there are pics from the 1950s of boats catching them in the same region. So it has happened before and reading other comments it doesn't seem like this is a very rare thing, but doesn't happen yearly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted yesterday at 01:46 PM Share Posted yesterday at 01:46 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:37 PM 1 hour ago, snowman19 said: Just to clarify to insure appropriate context: -There’s no doubt that currently Nino 3.4 is very warm for so early in the year. But keep in mind that Eliot’s chart showing the current warmth is from a combination of GW and El Nino. On that basis, it’s clear that Nino 3.4 is by a good margin the warmest on record. -But the best way to compare to past years as far as just El Niño component, itself, is to look at the relative anomalies for the same point in the year. Currently, relative 3.4 is ~+1.0. I’ll now compare to other weeklies, which go back to 1982: 09JUN1982 1.0 11JUN1997 0.8 10JUN2015 0.6 14JUN2023 0.4 So, going back to 1982, 2026 is currently near the warmest on record about tied with 1982, which is itself obviously quite notable. To go back further, I need to look at relative monthlies. So, these won’t give as precise a comparison, but they’re still worth mentioning. Currently, the CFS is projecting June of 2026 to be ~+0.95. I’ll now compare to some past June relatives: 1957 6 1.13 1965 6 1.09 1972 6 0.98 So, 2026 is projected for June, alone, to be slightly cooler than 1957/1965 and ~same as 1972. So, folks need to be careful to not let others deceive you. The current El Niño strength is by no means out on its own and is instead in the general vicinity of 1982, 1972, 1965, and 1957 for the warmest since 1950. Going back further is less reliable for comparison purposes. But per Eric Webb’s MJJ 3.4 anomalies, one could argue that 1877, 1902, 1905, and 1941 could have easily been similar, if not warmer than 2026 in mid June. There’s a good chance that 1877 was a bit warmer and some chance that 1905 was slightly warmer in mid June. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Today’s -29 is the 33rd straight day with a sub -5 SOI. Tomorrow will make 34. That’s pretty historic because that will make it the 3rd longest sub -5 streak on record back to 1991! The only two longer ones were in 1997-8 and they were extremely long: 51 and 42 days, respectively. The beauty of the SOI is that it doesn’t appear to be strongly affected by CC. Thus it doesn’t need a RONI-like adjustment to remain a good indicator of ENSO strength. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 6 hours ago, snowman19 said: except for those two peaks that are higher 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Oh, I think I know what he meant - it just wasn’t at first clear he meant the 3 SD itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 6/10/2026 at 5:55 AM, PhiEaglesfan712 said: The 3 el ninos in the 82-92 period were all robust, though. The 88-89 la nina happened after the 2nd event. That's the only time really that robust el ninos were so close to each other. It will be interesting to see, after this el nino event, if the same pattern follows, and get such a strong la nina. It's possible. I'm kind of leaning that way this time since we're likely to get a fully coupled and canonical ('97-like) full warm pool discharge and it will take some time for that to recover. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago The WPAC DWKW looks real healthy now….. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Despite being steady last 7 days, I predict that 3.4 will warm by 0.3 in Mon’s update because of how the weeks compare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roardog Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, GaWx said: Despite being steady last 7 days, I predict that 3.4 will warm by 0.3 in Mon’s update because of how the weeks compare. Does it look like the extreme -SOI will continue? It'll be interesting to see how low the 30 day average will go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, roardog said: Does it look like the extreme -SOI will continue? It'll be interesting to see how low the 30 day average will go? Models are suggesting -SOI will lessen. There’s chance -SOI will end 6/16. If so, could be 6 days of +SOI before goes back -. Guessing per models 6/14: -15 to -20 6/15: -6 to -13 6/16: +5 to -6 6/17: +8 to -5 6/18: +16 to +1 6/19: +21 to +4 (the high point) 6/20-4 should drop back down and get back to negative by 6/21-2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago It was last year at this time when the PDO started its dump. Interesting to see if we repeat. I know Larry uses Ncep(?) numbers, but I think they pretty much followed the same trend as this graph. Feel fee to correct me Larry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, mitchnick said: It was last year at this time when the PDO took its dump. Interesting to see if we repeat. I know Larry uses Ncep(?) numbers, but I think they pretty much followed the same trend as this graph. Feel fee to correct me Larry. Yes, ncep ~-0.75 to -1 vs WCS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted 29 minutes ago Share Posted 29 minutes ago 41 minutes ago, GaWx said: Yes, ncep ~-0.75 to -1 vs WCS Sheesh...what do we have to wait another decade to get outta this? Boo, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted 12 minutes ago Share Posted 12 minutes ago 37 minutes ago, mitchnick said: It was last year at this time when the PDO started its dump. Interesting to see if we repeat. I know Larry uses Ncep(?) numbers, but I think they pretty much followed the same trend as this graph. Feel fee to correct me Larry. Mitch, the -0.75 to -1 is/was a general guide based on several years of data. However, I just did a new compare as it appears that ncep may have raised some of their months since I last looked closely and perhaps their methodology recently changed??: 7/25: ~-0.6 8/25: ~0 9/25: ~0 10/25: ~-0.3 11/25: ~0 12/25: ~+0.35 1/26: ~0 2/26:~-0.5 3/26: ~-0.6 4/26: ~-0.6 5/26: ~-0.7 So range for 7/25-5/26 was -0.7 to +0.35! Avg ~-0.3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted 8 minutes ago Share Posted 8 minutes ago ^ “Given the inability of the Anticyclone to exercise its normal duties at this time of year; warm waters are fully invading the Peruvian coastline and beginning to manifest off the north of #Chile.On the other hand, with a different dynamic, the dissipation of the cold anomaly off the north of #Ecuador was also observed.#Lima today Saturday, one week from the start of the astronomical winter, is seeing temperatures between 25°C and 27°C.#ElNiño” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now