Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,530
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

January 24-25: Miracle or Mirage


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

It sounds like the ICON solution featured a deepening coastal low that pulls in a warm nose for some. I haven't heard this scenario being mentioned on other guidance, so is this a new development? Could we see this pop up on other guidance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, high risk said:

        Not fully true.    While the time it starts doesn't match the operational, the actual cycles of the parallel use inputs from the same model cycles as the ops.    Worth noting that the ops does not include any Canadian inputs in the winter suite, while the parallel uses several.  And a reminder for everyone:  both the ops and para winter products only update at 01/07/13/19z.   

Thanks. The Canadian inputs will be a nice touch, especially around the Great Lakes which we’ve seen with verification. Does better with LES physics and outputs absolutely bias low on the NBM 4.3 around that area. Also noticed the 5.0 biases low on these synoptic scale setups, but does do a solid job on the edges, so it’s give and take. We’ll be chatting as we get closer to implementation. Excited for the new changes in version 5.0. 
 

Back to your regularly scheduled programming. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexD1990 said:

It sounds like the ICON solution featured a deepening coastal low that pulls in a warm nose for some. I haven't heard this scenario being mentioned on other guidance, so is this a new development? Could we see this pop up on other guidance?

Depends on how the trailing northern stream vort goes. A phase there makes it more likely. But, usually, in order to get the biggest totals, you need to smell the sleet.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

Thanks. The Canadian inputs will be a nice touch, especially around the Great Lakes which we’ve seen with verification. Does better with LES physics and outputs absolutely bias low on the NBM 4.3 around that area. Also noticed the 5.0 biases low on these synoptic scale setups, but does do a solid job on the edges, so it’s give and take. We’ll be chatting as we get closer to implementation. Excited for the new changes in version 5.0. 

       One other thing to note is that the para gives more weight to the CAMs in the short range, so it will be really fun to see what this event looks like as get closer to it happening.

  • Like 4
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AlexD1990 said:

It sounds like the ICON solution featured a deepening coastal low that pulls in a warm nose for some. I haven't heard this scenario being mentioned on other guidance, so is this a new development? Could we see this pop up on other guidance?

Everything is trending that way. Primary driving into the TN valley then a handoff off of NC. Interestingly, the euro ai was showing that type of progression several days ago. CMC was as well but was very amplified. From a history and climo standpoint it makes a lot of sense. It's a classic progression for a major SE/MA winter storm. 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bob Chill said:

Everything is trending that way. Primary driving into the TN valley then a handoff off of NC. Interestingly, the euro ai was showing that type of progression several days ago. CMC was as well but was very amplified. From a history and climo standpoint it makes a lot of sense. It's a classic progression for a major SE/MA winter storm. 

Agreed 100% with this. More of a classic progression and honestly a lot more analogs like it that we can compare to. It's what produces the 2 part WAA over to CBB/deform PD2 and others have had. You love that primary into NE TN/W NC and transferring with this kind of airmass. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Sucky thing about being into weather and blabbing about it is when the models start coming out and I'm clearly deep into my screen, 1200 co workers pick THEN to want to come over and ask me about the storm.  Anyway, GFS looks good so far.

I think Saturday could be completely dry?

It’s also worse these days than it used to be, because everyone sees 19-23” on their Apple Weather app and the question is no longer “will it snow” but “two feet of snow?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JakkelWx said:

ICON: snow starts around 6 AM or so Sunday morning, if not a little later.

3 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Sucky thing about being into weather and blabbing about it is when the models start coming out and I'm clearly deep into my screen, 1200 co workers pick THEN to want to come over and ask me about the storm.  Anyway, GFS looks good so far.

I think Saturday could be completely dry?

yeah, I'm still a little sad we've pushed this back a day. I guess it seems to offer us a higher-end outcome, but would rather just get this done sooner rather than later. Guess it ups the odds of OPM giving us a day on Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...