Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Monitoring first regional significant winter impact event. Magnitude likely tempered. At this time NE PA/SE NY and SNE primarily. Jan 7/8.


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

Pretty damn cool the way the pacific jet just amps up with time with such consistency. Check out the area in Northern Gulf of Mexico. Significant El Niño flexing.

You see a firehouse pointed toward southeast Canada; that air coverages and sinks, filling our Canadian high with maritime tropical air. It doesn’t anchor and the depth of the cold weakens with time.

It’s why a significant -NAO can get neutered with a deep trough in the west and El Niño background.

IMG_0523.gif

Pope left our forum and is relegated to NYC . I mean :lol: 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Damage In Tolland said:

Pope left our forum and is relegated to NYC . I mean :lol: 

Not sure I’ve ever seen an arctic high “fill with tropical maritime air”….interesting physics and thermodynamics there. Might be a new discovery. 

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Confluence is good…just as long as you aren’t so close to it that it screws you. Confluence is what helps create awesome fronto bands. 

Its usually a bad thing up here as we're closer to it, That's why i generally don't much care for Miiler A's, One because it wants to slide ENE or even ESE if it doesn't gain enough lat before it happens, And two, Because it usually is LBSW before it does arrive and we end up with an occluded system, That's why i have more invest in the next one, Going to be hard escaping that precip and CAD should come into play.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

Not sure I’ve ever seen an arctic high “fill with tropical maritime air”….interesting physics and thermodynamics there. Might be a new discovery. 

Their was never a risk south for this imo…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay ..sufficed it is to say ( not including the Euro just yet) these 12z blends signal a major snow fall.

I.e., something > than the "moderate ceiling" I assessed.   

However, I'm not ready to sign on just yet - although I really, really appreciate the gesture hahaha

Seriously, this hasn't relayed into the physically realized sounding grid out west, and a high speed ... essentially longitude pattern that is at the far eastern end of the Rossby wave coherency ... those are circumstances not well handled by models.  It makes events very prone to subtle variations - so prone that even in these more modern/well-advance assimilation technologies, there can be very important nuances introduced when that relay happens that take away(add) to this thing.

There's that... but also, the stuff I said about attenuating magnitudes in the models when crossing D5s is still not tested just yet.  I'd like to see this tomorrow morning to be more confident that we're getting through the de-amplification two-step.

I'm just trying for some objective 'what-can-go-wrong' isms here. I don't think we have to reach very far to grab a hold of those.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Okay ..sufficed it is to say ( not including the Euro just yet) these 12z blends signal a major snow fall.

I.e., something > than the "moderate ceiling" I assessed.   

However, I'm not ready to sign on just yet - although I really, really appreciate the gesture hahaha

Seriously, this hasn't relayed into the physically realized sounding grid out west, and a high speed ... essentially longitude pattern that is at the far eastern end of the Rossby wave coherency ... those are circumstances not well handled by models.  It makes events very prone to subtle variations - so prone that even in these more modern/well-advance assimilation technologies, there can be very important nuances introduced when that relay happens that take away(add) to this thing.

There's that... but also, the stuff I said about attenuating magnitudes in the models when crossing D5s is still not tested just yet.  I'd like to see this tomorrow morning to be more confident that we're getting through the de-amplification two-step.

I'm just trying for some objective 'what-can-go-wrong' isms here. I don't think we have to reach very far to grab a hold of those.

I am still waiting for the Tippy 30% redux later this week...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Not sure I’ve ever seen an arctic high “fill with tropical maritime air”….interesting physics and thermodynamics there. Might be a new discovery. 

Ya, when I read that I was like, I’m no meteorologist, but I don’t remember ever seeing, or hearing of that happen either…. ?  
 

George did say back on Sunday, that the pope knows his stuff though….:lol:.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

This why that guy has no credibility....he never sticks around and shows and accountability for his brutal calls

It’s one thing to make a call that’s different, nothing wrong with that. But when you act like a clown and then disappear when it becomes apparent you are going to be wrong, it’s wicked lame.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

This why that guy has no credibility....he never sticks around and shows and accountability for his brutal calls

He could learn a thing or two from Kev.

Just double down on your next call. ;)

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

This why that guy has no credibility....he never sticks around and shows and accountability for his brutal calls

It seems He’s most always on the wrong side of most storms. Then gets nasty with posters who ask him what he’s looking at?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Versus your old ‘hood in Woodstock? Yeah it will taint quicker near Ginxy but not by much. He’s in a decent spot far enough off the water for major concerns. I’d think that area would need a true hugger track (like basically over the forks of LI) to have major ptype issues. 
 

Im assuming you’re near Moosup/Sterling? I’m on mobile so I can’t see locations in posts right now. 

Just north in Brooklyn, but sitting in a Valley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez it sure busy in this here Forum.
Lovin it cause it keeps me grounded to my roots.
I've been running the Cave program on one of my computers. Interesting software and looks very detailed, with lots to learn.
My worthless obligatory snow maps will be forthcoming closer in to go time.

I don't want anyone to hold their breath.   :D :snowing:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...