Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

December 2023


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

Scott noticed the inverted trough on the GFS 3 or 4 days ago. So yeah, it's been there. The column should be cooling over top so that may offer that instability.  

Thing is, 'NORLUN' used to always be difficult/elusive.  As far as I'm aware they are yet to be very well forecast' ?  not sure what the skill on that phenomenon is as of late.  

I've tried to make a call on NORLUN in the past. The errors I observed were most commonly: getting it to happen, then,  pivoting S as a correction in guidance.  They seemed to start out at some latitude and then tick S.  I've seen some up in Maine tick S and keeping ticking S, ultimately ticking right on out to S and not happening on land at all when the time frame arrives. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I know.  CNN is :facepalm: and cannot be trusted, as their vetting and materialization of "news" is completely sculpted for manipulating mouse clicks, thumb swipes and TV channel selection. 

But in this case, the essence is valid and I'm willing to drop that reticence in lieu of the bigger picture:   

I don't have qualms with reality and I don't play games with statistical portents, ever.  As soon as the latter starts to materialize a portrait of either cold, warm ...wet or white ...etc, that's it.  I critique that art, not the intent of the artist. In this case,  .9" on day A and .9" on day B ... is a meaninglessness distinction to me. The two day being 1.8" does nothing to invalidate the astonishingly bad illustration of what that means when considering the 650 day span. 

Sometimes we do this in society.  We latch onto to meaningless trifle in the grand tapestry of dog shit truth because there's comfort in the debate. It reminds me my cat while growing up. I would do something like all little shits do to mess with her, and she'd run and stick her head in bag or under the covers. Her whole ass end and tail would be completely sticking out and exposed.  The little space we provide in the debates shelter our perceptions, puts off our necessary acceptance.  Again... it's a human thing. 

The other thing, the articles that I have read, state, 'in a single day' . I'm not numb to the notion that the way that is presented is divisive, but consider the source LOL.  It's like that scene in that over-the-top Michael Bay ( the CNN director of Hollywood ) movie,  "Independence Day" when all the clamor (debating .9 spanning two days...) fades to silence while this eclipsing shadow overtakes skies.  

I hear ya. But they just posted this a week ago…

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/25/weather/snowfall-temperatures-climate-change-water/index.html

image.png
 

…which gives a totally different look at megalopolis snow climo. 

The problem is the actual climate change data isn’t flashy enough for the media to grab “a-ha” headlines. Those of us that understand the science know what’s going on and understand the effects. But I feel a lot of these hype headlines, especially after 1 crappy season for the megalopolis, hurts the cause. You don’t have to go too far back to find epic snowy winters for BOS, NYC, and DCA so I’d rather not factor in one specific season into any climate debate. It just gives the deniers fuel for their fire. 
 

Just my $0.02

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Scott noticed the inverted trough on the GFS 3 or 4 days ago. So yeah, it's been there. The column should be cooling over top so that may offer that instability.  

Thing is, 'NORLUN' used to always be elusive.  As far as I'm aware they are yet to be very well forecast' ?  not sure what the skill on that phenomenon is as of late.  

I've tried to make a call on NORLUN in the past. The errors I observed were most commonly: getting it to happen, then,  pivoting S as a correction in guidance.  They seemed to start out at some latitude and then tick S.  I've seen some up in Maine tick S and keeping ticking S, ultimately ticking right on out to S and not happening on land at all when the time frame arrives. 

 

Yeah I file this thing as modeled just an inv trough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I hear ya. But they just posted this a week ago…

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/25/weather/snowfall-temperatures-climate-change-water/index.html

image.png
 

…which gives a totally different look at megalopolis snow climo. 

The problem is the actual climate change data isn’t flashy enough for the media to grab “a-ha” headlines. Those of us that understand the science know what’s going on and understand the effects. But I feel a lot of these hype headlines, especially after 1 crappy season for the megalopolis, hurts the cause. You don’t have to go too far back to find epic snowy winters for BOS, NYC, and DCA so I’d rather not factor in one specific season into any climate debate. It just gives the deniers fuel for their fire. 
 

Just my $0.02

I'd love to see what actual goes into compiling a map like this. Because raw data here would show there has been very minimal change here. In fact, from 1973-74 to 2022-23, Nov-Mar precip increased 0.06" and snowfall increases 1.1".

20231203_101637.jpg

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Blue hill special on 12k.

Good lift in DGZ in the IVT. May have to watch for a sneaky low end advisory potential for E MA…esp just off the immediate water. Wouldn’t forecast anything yet but def keep it in the back of our minds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

Remember when it use to snow in December ? Meh

Even in the cold 76-77 Winter the first real snow was Christmas night.  Snow on the ground Christmas morning in the NYC metro (and I suspect most of I-95) wasn't that common.  It will only get worse as it seems like the offshore Atlantic waters are getting warmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Good lift in DGZ in the IVT. May have to watch for a sneaky low end advisory potential for E MA…esp just off the immediate water. Wouldn’t forecast anything yet but def keep it in the back of our minds. 

Yeah decent look on the soundings. Definitely one to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

you don't think there's any validity? it's supported by the tropical convection moving along

Fair enough, but we aren’t kicking the can this winter. If things look good by then and we have an event on the horizon, then I’ll be excited. If we get to early Jan with nothing on the horizon then its time to write winter off as a rat. I don’t think that’s too unreasonable.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, George001 said:

Fair enough, but we aren’t kicking the can this winter. If things look good by then and we have an event on the horizon, then I’ll be excited. If we get to early Jan with nothing on the horizon then its time to write winter off as a rat. I don’t think that’s too unreasonable.

2015 started later in January

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dendrite said:

I hear ya. But they just posted this a week ago…

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/25/weather/snowfall-temperatures-climate-change-water/index.html

image.png
 

…which gives a totally different look at megalopolis snow climo. 

The problem is the actual climate change data isn’t flashy enough for the media to grab “a-ha” headlines. Those of us that understand the science know what’s going on and understand the effects. But I feel a lot of these hype headlines, especially after 1 crappy season for the megalopolis, hurts the cause. You don’t have to go too far back to find epic snowy winters for BOS, NYC, and DCA so I’d rather not factor in one specific season into any climate debate. It just gives the deniers fuel for their fire. 
 

Just my $0.02

Oh I think that's worth a proverbial couple of bucks, actually.  

I've yelled with pen for years that CC doesn't have enough natural advocates, in that, it's taking too long to appeal to any of the natural senses. That is the problem

What is read on the side of humanity's bus is, "Denial Unlimited" while we ride along toward the cliff.  The ass end of the vehicle is completely stained by exhaust soot. 

This probably all should go over to the climate forum somewhere, but the lacking evidence aspect is at last starting to change. Images of glacial retreat, sea level rise this and that.  Hearing of rising heat -related deaths (empirically) at an alarming rate all over the world. It's not like it was just a hot Asia. It's observed and objectively measured spanning every continent (when will DCA-BOS have their 108 day). 

For objective minded observers, these are not easily explainable by so-called, 'naturally occurring phenomenon' of rogue weather patterns. The unilateral aspect is damming, nor are these invented CNNers... As much as we loath the "Industrial Media Complex,"  you know ...maybe, just maybe, the shock headline can in principle serve an unintended good - this is what it takes (apparently) for pacified Industrial societies to wake the fuck up. 

It's always been that way. Since (really) the early to particularly mid last century.  Anyone can search this material and read about it in short order but scientists began postulating global warming over a 100 years ago. It was mostly drilled into volcanoes and/or celestial mechanics in the early decades - probably the source of the "this has always happened" mantra. But, by the 1960s the first postulations were advanced related to C02 - that which can be related to human activities. 

The 1970s were an 'awareness set-back,' more apt to say an 'ah, bunch of bullshitness' decade (the very primitive first form of denial) as the global temperature curve either leveled off for awhile, or even descended slightly (I've seen conflicting records on either).

But really, this warming world has been a non-deviated positive when observed over the longer term trend, going back to 1900. It's just that only in the last 20 years have we begun to cross thresholds. So yeah, the proverbial memo is now passing through eye balls and ear canals.  Kind of reminds me of how art can be inspired by reality. We only hope reality won't parody that scene in the movie "Return Of The Jedi," between "Darth Sidious" and the "Luke Skywalker" hero:   "Young fool. Only now, at the end, do you understand"    

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, George001 said:

Fair enough, but we aren’t kicking the can this winter. If things look good by then and we have an event on the horizon, then I’ll be excited. If we get to early Jan with nothing on the horizon then its time to write winter off as a rat. I don’t think that’s too unreasonable.

I think that is unreasonable. Ninos are backloaded... places can easily not see much before Jan begins and the rest of the winter can still be great. 2014-15 is the prime example of that

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...