Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Monday 12/2 Threat Disco


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

EPS a north tick too. Pretty good for a lot of SNE away from the water. 850s get mild srn half of CT.

Everyone knew it was coming, but it seems a bit early...I would assume this "trend" continues until at least 12z tomorrow. Even so, that still puts us almost 60 hours until the second part of the system with plenty of room for wobbles....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Spanks45 said:

Everyone knew it was coming, but it seems a bit early...I would assume this "trend" continues until at least 12z tomorrow. Even so, that still puts us almost 60 hours until the second part of the system with plenty of room for wobbles....

This is waffling territory. 00z could go the other way. I don't see trends one way or another yet. The big question marks are the confluence to our NE and the ridge in sctrl Canada. That won't be modeled well until we get closer..perhaps later tomorrow and Saturday morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spanks45 said:

Everyone knew it was coming, but it seems a bit early...I would assume this "trend" continues until at least 12z tomorrow. Even so, that still puts us almost 60 hours until the second part of the system with plenty of room for wobbles....

Too early, it will come back south. The real north trend starts 36hrs out right after news stations issue numbers, so the areas initially forcasted to get 10-15, end up with 90 percent rain.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Frozen QPF is really what it’s about... 1.0” or greater liquid equivalent at 32F or below is/would be a significant winter event.  Regardless of mix or all snow.

Feel pretty good about all frozen just west of Newburyport-KBED and down to NW of PVD into interior SW CT. Might be ZR further south, but anything below 32F that falls I consider frozen. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

This is waffling territory. 00z could go the other way. I don't see trends one way or another yet. The big question marks are the confluence to our NE and the ridge in sctrl Canada. That won't be modeled well until we get closer..perhaps later tomorrow and Saturday morning.

Then again, looking closer for the western portions of CT/MA and NY the EPS precip numbers seemed to have increased and expanded, even the ( I know, I looked at the snow output too). So yes a tick north, but also an increase in moisture that didn't affect much of SNE negatively

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Frozen QPF is really what it’s about... 1.0” or greater liquid equivalent at 32F or below is/would be a significant winter event.  Regardless of mix or all snow.

What it will do is give a great base of wet snow then ice then snow so our chances of a white Cmas are very good with no big warmups in Dec

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Spanks45 said:

Then again, looking closer for the western portions of CT/MA and NY the EPS precip numbers seemed to have increased and expanded, even the ( I know, I looked at the snow output too). So yes a tick north, but also an increase in moisture that didn't affect much of SNE negatively

Right, a good thump will help offset warming too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Spanks45 said:

Then again, looking closer for the western portions of CT/MA and NY the EPS precip numbers seemed to have increased and expanded, even the ( I know, I looked at the snow output too). So yes a tick north, but also an increase in moisture that didn't affect much of SNE negatively

All that matters is frozen, these ticks are noise. Wholesale shifts are the ones you hope are a blip. I agree with your interpretation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NYCweatherNOW said:

My snowmap, check me out on instagram at @nycweathernow

 

AFE991D7-F33D-4859-8B5C-CAF63EE03A77.jpeg

Have to factor in that people in your C-2 and 2-4 zones of NY and MA will also see several inches probably from the initial warm advection ahead of he occlusion so probably nobody ends up with <2", unless way up north someplace maybe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The 4 Seasons said:

I'd put the bullseye much farther north than that map though if i were to make one, i cant see SW, S Central CT getting more snow than all of MA. Not right now anways.

He's in the bronx, so it appears to simply be a matter of his goggles needing an adjustment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JC-CT said:

He's in the bronx, so it appears to simply be a matter of his goggles needing an adjustment.

It's that perspective bias, we even see this with the NWS. OKX treats the northern zones like Canada, and the southern zones like the tropics. Reminds me of that Mass-holes map that was posted in this forum.

You can even see it with this storm with the LFOs in CT. 4 Southern Zones in CT, which are the northern most zones of OKX were the snowiest but the southern Zones of ALY (Litchfield) and BOX (Hartford, Tolland, Windham) included more rain/sleet/mix and less snow than areas south of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...