WinterWolf Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, ineedsnow said: Ill lock the 12 on the nam. Ya I was at about 11 inches..I'd take that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 hour ago, weathafella said: I thought that was on the heels of 1/26/11? Lol yeah I temporarily had a Kevfart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: Any snow is good snow... but after the last few model suites of people finished with 4-5" it would def be disappointing..whether people will admit it or not It's usually not a good idea to fall in love with those exotic numbers anyways this far out. I'll be happy with 6. The earlier January storm was a good one and satisfied me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 I'm still at 10-12" on the 00z NAM, I don't know where the 4" came from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 I have zero expectations for this system currently... I said I'd wait until 12z tomorrow before really getting invested in any kind of outcome. There is still a lot to sort out.... and a tick back in the less impressive direction is definitely still on the table... pretty critical 12-24 hours coming up on the models. locking in anything right now is setting yourself up for major disappointment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, CoastalWx said: It's usually not a good idea to fall in love with those exotic numbers anyways this far out. I'll be happy with 6. The earlier January storm was a good one and satisfied me. Well said! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 I'd say 6-10" lolies to 12" region wide including here. Perhaps locally higher. That's what my gut says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersComing Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 By no means even remotely an expert here but seems to me this storm has had the best model agreement for the most part. I'm sure there is going to be some wavering but seems safe to say that almost everyone gets a decent 4-8 or 6-12 event with maybe a couple higher spots. Just need to stay the course!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: I'm still at 10-12" on the 00z NAM, I don't know where the 4" came from? You're not but hopefully it's wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said: I have zero expectations for this system currently... I said I'd wait until 12z tomorrow before really getting invested in any kind of outcome. There is still a lot to sort out.... and a tick back in the less impressive direction is definitely still on the table... pretty critical 12-24 hours coming up on the models. locking in anything right now is setting yourself up for major disappointment I see you haven't seen that therapist just yet... It's gonna be fun! snow on snow for many! and another couple of storms in the pipe! good things could happen. and we are alive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Paul Gordon Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Looks like there are a lot of people saying the NAM rules at this point. Or is it just model sniffing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, USCAPEWEATHERAF said: I'm still at 10-12" on the 00z NAM, I don't know where the 4" came from? What are you looking at? You are absolutely not modeled that amount. Even the weenie kuchera method struggles to get you to 4". better hope it's wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 TauntingFlizzard, eat a snickers bar and go to bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, weathafella said: Well said! How's our South of the border Friends numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 5 minutes ago, J Paul Gordon said: Looks like there are a lot of people saying the NAM rules at this point. Or is it just model sniffing? This: "Chris mentioned that it initialized the s/w out west to weak on the Nam i believe." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 A reminder that the real models are coming up too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 You guys are reactionary nerved up addicts - hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: How's our South of the border Friends numbers? Too early. MET is paltry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Looks like the Nam is almost dead nutz to its 12z run but a couple mb's weaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazey Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 See what the rgem says shortly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 27 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: Yes, that was the 00z NAM that was already too high with the heights near the shortwave, same with the 18z GFS and 12z Euro. Eh, congrats albany? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJonesWX Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: You guys are reactionary nerved up addicts - hahaha are you new here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Omg rgem is perfect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 RGEM still going wild: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 See that's a better inflow look for sure. I assume the initial s/w looks better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 EPIC CCB snows for you guys on the RGEM. Jealous. I'd do well down here in Philly too, but nothing like parts of MA. That is awesome looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Based on the black and white maps RGEM buries areas that NAM kind of gypped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: See that's a better inflow look for sure. I assume the initial s/w looks better. It basically has a 12/9/05 CCB stinger finish over E MA/RI the final 3 hours. It destroys Tolland to ORH for a few hours right before it does that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Rgem looks like it would be better than the 00z NAM here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 hi rgem lol.never fails those that swing with every op qpf printout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.