Hoth Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, WinterWolf said: New data... Shortwave on shore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 OMG the play by play.. maybe we should leave it to one person??? or open a thread for model play by play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 NAM gone wild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Hoth said: Shortwave on shore? Yes I believe it is. That's why I'm thinking new data ingested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, Bostonseminole said: OMG the play by play.. maybe we should leave it to one person??? or open a thread for model play by play? Some are the sites are locked at certain hrs to be fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, WinterWolf said: Yes I believe it is. That's why I'm thinking king new data ingested. I believe so, the shortwave has been sampled fully now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said: NAM gone wild. As far out as i got, It looked like that was going to be the case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, dryslot said: Some are the sites are locked at certain hrs to be fair Yeah normally we can do without the hr by hr PBP on the NAM, but NCEP was locking up and a few other sites...so we can allow it this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 8, 2017 Author Share Posted February 8, 2017 20 minutes ago, kdxken said: Bob, I have been meaning to say this for a while , I find you one of the best posters on the board . While not a met , your skill at reading models and keeping things real is much appreciated . While I'm not one for accolades, I do appreciate the compliment. Took many years of reading/learning to get here and I'll always be an amateur when compared to many in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Bostonseminole said: OMG the play by play.. maybe we should leave it to one person??? or open a thread for model play by play? Lighten up Francis. We haven't been able to do this much lately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Well para at hour 39 has the system at 40N/71.6W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 It probably got buried with the PBP but I did mention that it looks like the shortwave is deeper than modeled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said: Yeah normally we can do without the hr by hr PBP on the NAM, but NCEP was locking up and a few other sites...so we can allow it this time. ok looks good at 27hrs.. 2mb stronger and bit further north.. but WB is really slow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, weathafella said: Well para at hour 39 has the system at 40N/71.6W I'm happy with west..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 What an inland banding signal on both regular and para! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: It probably got buried with the PBP but I did mention that it looks like the shortwave is deeper than modeled. That may bode well when corrected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, weathafella said: What an inland banding signal on both regular and para! Tasty. Perhaps some taint in the usual areas is not out of the question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Doesn't look much different than 18z to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, OceanStWx said: It probably got buried with the PBP but I did mention that it looks like the shortwave is deeper than modeled. That's a good thing...thanks for the info it is appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTA Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 SREF is not matching with the alternate NAM pbp. Last three runs (somewhat out-of-range) SREF plumes have starting cutting back. One could argue the NAM might be the one to follow. Tomorrow is a Yuge day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USCAPEWEATHERAF Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 I don't think I taint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, CT Rain said: Doesn't look much different than 18z to me Just noise accounting for tiny differences I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 500 kind of opens up at the end...it starts stronger for sure, but then it doesn't really continue on that path as it reaches our latitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 In and out, but nice hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Looks to get a kick ENE , Would rather see that track into the GOM instead of east of Novie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Just now, ORH_wxman said: 500 kind of opens up at the end...it starts stronger for sure, but then it doesn't really continue on that path as it reaches our latitude. Kind of a mess of s/w's in the trough. If that lead s/w was stronger..that would be nasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 8-12" with lolli 15" is where this will end up . Gonna be 2-3 big bands and one far NW of where qpf queens would think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 yeah, looked better but then just shot east pretty quickly, end result cut back on amounts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Over by dinnertime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 1 minute ago, HoarfrostHubb said: Over by dinnertime Was always the case with this system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.