40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Yeah anywhere - Twitter, Facebook, etc. You can post the low resolution WMO essential Euro/EPS data but none of the high resolution stuff. WMO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2016 Author Share Posted January 2, 2016 your season 22 total by Jan 31st?Hopefully Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 WMO? It's on this page. http://models.weatherbell.com/ecmwf.php This is the only Euro stuff that can be reproduced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Damn. In general...not just here, right? unless WXBELL puts them out in public domain, FB Twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Stage name? Eva Distrukshun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 unless WXBELL puts them out in public domain, FB Twitter. That's actually still not true unless you want to embed the entire tweet or Facebook post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 That's actually still not true unless you want to embed the entire tweet or Facebook post.he was asking about outside this site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Snowing insanely hard right now everything covered again nice squall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Great work here, Feb was more anomalous than Dec in many locales. p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Great work here, Feb was more anomalous than Dec in many locales. p I think the standard deviation for december is higher. March 2012 might be the highest of them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Pretty much exact inverse of Feb 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 2, 2016 Author Share Posted January 2, 2016 Ryan says .. It's coming https://twitter.com/ryanhanrahan/status/683093411306573824 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 I think the standard deviation for december is higher. March 2012 might be the highest of them all.? At any rate nothing short of historic on both spectrums in one calendar year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 I think the standard deviation for december is higher. March 2012 might be the highest of them all. February 2015 was more anomalous on a standard dev level since February at BOS/ORH has about 0.3-0.4F less for a standard dev than December. I'm not sure for other sites, but I know in SNE, December has a higher standard dev than February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy4Confluence Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 4-9" N of I84 is a massacre? Nice storm threat. For Mass. Here's how I break it down using the 18z gfs Precip map: Hr 186 - .5" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 5 inches hr 189 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 192 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 195 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 198 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 201 - .5" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 5 inches hr 204 - .25" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 2.5 inches ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals 4.25" of QPF giving Most of Mass 42.5 inches. If I'm wrong, tell me how you would do the math. I'd love to learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Hartford's 16.1 average blows my mind. Did they beat Feb '34? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Are there sites that calculate specifics like SD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 For Mass. Here's how I break it down using the 18z gfs Precip map: Hr 186 - .5" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 5 inches hr 189 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 192 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 195 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 198 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 201 - .5" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 5 inches hr 204 - .25" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 2.5 inches ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals 4.25" of QPF giving Most of Mass 42.5 inches. If I'm wrong, tell me how you would do the math. I'd love to learn. I don't know what you looked at, but I see nothing like that on wxbell. I hope to hell you are right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Drove through a pretty good squall about an hour or so ago coming through Orange. Rt 2 was snow covered. Appears to have been a heavy dusting here at the house. 29/22. Nice wintery feel with dust on crust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Does anyone else see inches and inches of QPF on the 18z GFS?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy4Confluence Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 I don't know what you looked at, but I see nothing like that on wxbell. I hope to hell you are right. Here's where I'm getting the depictions. It's the NOAA site: http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_186_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=186&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_189_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=189&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_192_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=192&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_195_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=195&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_198_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=198&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_201_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=201&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Are there sites that calculate specifics like SD? Yes - here's BDL http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/orders/cdo/661982.pdf Check out the monthly climate normals product from NCDC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 For Mass. Here's how I break it down using the 18z gfs Precip map: Hr 186 - .5" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 5 inches hr 189 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 192 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 195 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 198 - .75" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 7.5 inches hr 201 - .5" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 5 inches hr 204 - .25" of precip with a QPF ratio of 10:1 would = 2.5 inches ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals 4.25" of QPF giving Most of Mass 42.5 inches. If I'm wrong, tell me how you would do the math. I'd love to learn. I think you're overlapping. The precip is probably 6 and/or 12-hour precip, not 3-hour precip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Does anyone else see inches and inches of QPF on the 18z GFS?? Nah. I see like a 6-10" snowfall deal. Verbatim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Nah. I see like a 6-10" snowfall deal. Verbatim. Yeah it didn't look all that impressive verbatim. Obviously it means just about nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Yeah it didn't look all that impressive verbatim. Obviously it means just about nothing Yup. Let's just keep the signal there and get it into striking distance first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 I think you're overlapping. The precip is probably 6 and/or 12-hour precip, not 3-hour precip.12...so only off by a multiple of 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Here's where I'm getting the depictions. It's the NOAA site: http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_186_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=186&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_189_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=189&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_192_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=192&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_195_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=195&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_198_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=198&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/Image.php?image=data%2Fgfs%2F18%2Fgfs_namer_201_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif&model=gfs&area=namer&storm=&cycle=18¶m=850_temp_mslp_precip&fhr=201&group=Model+Guidance&imageSize=M&ps=model&use_mins=no&preselected_formatted_cycle_date=20160101+18+UTC&scrollx=0&scrolly=0 Randy do yourself a favor and bookmark this, does the math for youhttp://wxweb.meteostar.com/sample/sample.shtml?text=KIJD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Good, thought I was losing my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.